Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More GOP Senators Say They Are Willing to Meet with Obama SCOTUS Nominee
Breitbart ^ | 03/16/16 | Dr. Susan Berry

Posted on 03/17/2016 5:24:12 AM PDT by Enlightened1

Several more GOP senators say they are willing to meet with President Barack Obama's nominee to the Supreme Court seat left open by the sudden death of Justice Antonin Scalia.

As Breitbart News reported earlier, Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-NH) 33%, Sen. Jeff Flake (R-AZ) 45%, and Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME)14% said they would be willing to meet with Judge Merrick Garland of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals.

"Judge Garland is a capable and accomplished jurist," Collins said in a statement. "The White House has requested that I meet with him, and I look forward to doing so, as has been my practice with all Supreme Court nominees."

Collins reportedly said she did not think Senate Majority Leader Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-KY) 44% would cave on considering Garland's nomination:

I don't see the majority leader changing his mind on this issue. He believes strongly that this should be a decision made by the next president. I don't agree with that decision, but I respect it. The irony, however, will be if the next president, whoever that may be, ends up nominating a person who is far more liberal than Judge Garland, who is considered to be a centrist.

"I meet with people," Flake said. "That's what I do."

Flake is a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee - all the Republican members of which sent a letter last month to McConnell informing him they will not hold any hearings on Obama's eventual nominee for the vacant seat.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: banglist; blunt; cochran; gop; meet; nominee; nra; supremecourt; theusualsuspects
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: ladyjane

Oh no question. The only reason Emperor Barky nominated that liberal scumbag is because he is already on board with the ‘RAT-treason agenda.

Now we’ll see if Mitch McConnell delivers on his promises.

Pardon me if I don’t hold my breath.


41 posted on 03/17/2016 6:49:23 AM PDT by mkjessup (Ted Cruz - what a colossal and tragic disappointment. "Cruz is lozin' it" - JimRob - exact quote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
Traitors everyone of them!
42 posted on 03/17/2016 6:50:18 AM PDT by Big Mack (I love this country. It�s the government that scares the crap out of me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronald_Magnus

The Establishment will NEVER give it to Cruz.

So why would you want Cruz to stay in only to give it to Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan?

If Cruz offers to step down, then he can probably get something he wants like a lifetime appointment with a U.S. Supreme Court seat.


43 posted on 03/17/2016 6:51:55 AM PDT by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

No. The judicial committee must NOT even talk about him.


44 posted on 03/17/2016 7:06:15 AM PDT by Hattie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flintlock

Merrick Garland was Janie Gorelick’s principal deputy at the Clinton justice dept.


45 posted on 03/17/2016 7:30:03 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

More GOP Traitors Say They Are Willing to Meet with Obama SCOTUS Nominee


46 posted on 03/17/2016 7:41:01 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

More Soros Stooges Say They Are Willing to Meet with Obama SCOTUS Nominee


47 posted on 03/17/2016 7:41:42 AM PDT by MarvinStinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CaptainAmiigaf
Republican roulette! Very good!

Note tagline. I hope you approve.

48 posted on 03/17/2016 8:43:20 AM PDT by Savage Beast (Establishment Republican Roulette: They have pointed the revolver at their own heads. CaptainAmiigaf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media
Only trump will build the wall? LOL!

(I bet he doesn't lift a brick.)

Breitbart on Cruz about the wall

Cruz fought the Gang of 8 Bill which would have established amnesty.

And, Ted Cruz was talking about building the wall in 2011 Source

49 posted on 03/17/2016 8:53:18 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Democrat_media
Just a bunch of lies.

You made the allegation that I am a liar. Pony up and prove it or STFU.

50 posted on 03/17/2016 8:54:49 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
The cowardly, craven, traitorous "Republican" pr!cks in the Senate are selling us out again.

Tar and feathers are too good for these backstabbers.

51 posted on 03/17/2016 9:03:21 AM PDT by Gritty (No Constitution can protect a people that does not know or care about what it says-Daniel Greenfield)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast

Sadly, I think it is right on. It is infuriating to be in the position where you can rely MORE on those against you than you can rely on those who “CLAIM” to be with you. Also, it stinks.


52 posted on 03/17/2016 9:42:05 AM PDT by CaptainAmiigaf (New York Times: "We print the news as it fits our views.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe

Supreme Court Justices should be nominated by the President, still should be confirmed by the Senate.
But should only hold the office for 13 years, then either be renominated or an alternate nominee should be put forth.


53 posted on 03/18/2016 4:27:17 PM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

WHY NOT.
The President is not DER FUHRER.


54 posted on 03/18/2016 4:28:50 PM PDT by 5th MEB (Progressives in the open; --- FIRE FOR EFFECT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson