Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Uncle Miltie

I have openly admitted I could live with Cruz, but I don’t see him as any change agent as he is funded by the same folks the rest are... I have also thought from day one he has huge general elections issues.

I have never thought Cruz a bad man, or directed hatred toward him or his supporters.... That ended when he blamed Trump for the unrest in Chicago... since then the rhetoric coming out of Cruz’s mouth might as well be a commies on that topic.... I personally am done with Cruz, if he thinks when organized thugs show up with the stated intent to cause mischief that its the other persons fault when they do, you are not remotely conservative... the stuff coming out of his mouth on this topic, he might as well be Bernie or any other leftist.


292 posted on 03/15/2016 12:31:59 PM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies ]


To: HamiltonJay
"as he is funded by the same folks"

I am the guy who got him off the ground. Me and a few thousand other guys. Back in March when Cruz was NOBODY, WE did that. Cruz owes US.

296 posted on 03/15/2016 12:33:52 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie ("Conservatives are to the Republican party what blacks are to the Democrat Party" - Awgie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies ]

To: HamiltonJay

“when he blamed Trump for the unrest in Chicago”

That was a mistake. Cruz is not mistake-free. He had to correct himself on two bits of legislation back in the Fall. Fair enough. He should correct himself on Chicago.


298 posted on 03/15/2016 12:35:07 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie ("Conservatives are to the Republican party what blacks are to the Democrat Party" - Awgie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies ]

To: HamiltonJay

An essay posted the other day called “The Hollow Man” really sums up Cruz accurately I think:

“For Ted Cruz, the cen­tral flaw is a malig­nant nar­cis­sism that erupts into con­de­scen­sion, intel­lec­tual arro­gance, and a sense of inevitabil­ity. He is no longer car­ry­ing the mes­sage; he is the mes­sage. That atti­tude, of course, leads to the mes­sage get­ting lost, as prin­ci­ple after prin­ci­ple is sac­ri­ficed to get the man into office, because that is all that mat­ters.”


300 posted on 03/15/2016 12:36:14 PM PDT by bigbob ("Victorious warriors win first and then go to war" Sun Tzu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies ]

To: HamiltonJay

Since Friday night Ted has doubled, tripled, quadrupled, etc..., down on those statements. He has zero intention of backtracking.


303 posted on 03/15/2016 12:38:47 PM PDT by tatown (Cruznoccio - A Washington DC Production)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies ]

To: HamiltonJay

Well, should he win the nomination & be campaigning against Bernie or HRC, I guess we’d get a real education on how a professional politician would handle violent disruptors & organized thugs.

They would, and will go after him if given the chance. His religious beliefs, his immigration, his college background, his finances, his marriage, his family, his friends....

I’m sure he would take responsibility for provoking them. (laughs)


390 posted on 03/15/2016 1:47:40 PM PDT by unsycophant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson