Posted on 03/06/2016 4:18:43 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
March 6th, 2016
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Radio host Rush Limbaugh; 2012 Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.; Romney.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Republican Party Chairman Reince Priebus ; Republican presidential candidates Donald Trump and Ted Cruz; Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton..
THIS WEEK (ABC): Republican presidential candidate John Kasich; Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders; Priebus.
STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Republican presidential candidate Marco Rubio; Sanders; Rep. Joaquin Castro, D-Texas; Romney.
Sharyl Attkissons Full Measure Full Measure tackles one of the biggest topics in American today - the southern border. We travel to the 372 mile long border between Arizona and Mexico where the question is: who's really calling the shots?
So very true...Rush is fair...
How is it Cruz is able to put this facade up as the great outsider when he is the ultimate DC wonk. He and his wife were deeply involved in the Bush administration and he basically chose his friend Roberts for the Supreme Court although now denies it.
How does he hide all of his connections?
Of course not. He caved to “soft spoken” Kennedy and removed his missiles from Cuba.
Did you hear why? Recently a guy explained we got a bead on the subs they had here - that blew K away, and the Russians left pronto.
I don’t see any motivation for Rush to cave to anyone.
ooops — hmmmm
...Rush is fair...
havent you heard ?!
That was also about the time almost every choir director decided that they needed to be like James Taylor; feature guitars and tambourines, and make every hymn sound like a one-timer celebrity singing the national anthem for the first time.
I lost over a million bucks when a company I invested in went bankrupt.
Here is the bottom line from your link which is very interesting to say the least. Somewhat over my head but anyone where who has a good knowledge of computers(AB,AB, AB) please read this link and see if its the real deal.
....................................
Oh, sweet Celestia. For those of you who dont know, Diebold makes election machines. They also have a corrupt CEO who donated to one of the candidates in the ballot box he was holding and then got nabbed for insider trading. They also have a history of controversy like you wouldnt believe.
There were some intrepid conspiracy theorists on Reddit trying to link Minnesotas large Somali population with some Somalian-sounding names on a 2010 CTF contest wordlist on KoreLogics website, but I leave that kind of an insanity as an exercise to those with tighter tinfoil hats than mine. Lets stick to the realm of possibility.
Now, I dont know how many caucuses use machines or how the votes are counted, or how many steps it takes to get from a caucus ballot to a computerized result, but I assume theres a machine somewhere along the way. My primary cause for concern here is that Minnesotas secretary of state asked for new voting machines this year, and Diebold likely picked up the contract. So that means 1 of 2 things:
1. Minnesota had new machines installed by a company working closely with a data security firm with links to the caucus process. Even if the email link is invalid, Diebold is heavily indebted to certain parts of the GOP. Rubio suspiciously wins on these machines despite polling indicating an 11 point Trump lead.
2. Minnesota is running 15-year old voting machines shot through with vulnerabilities. Even if the email address link isnt valid, we know theres an active exploit that allows jimmying with votes.
All this points to a very good reason why the MN GOP could predict results accurately before anyone even voted.
If youre going to take anything away from this article, please take away the hard evidence. I know its fun to run around blaming Diebold, or a potentially innocent caucus employee, but thats not what this article is about. Its about that I think that this warrants a huge investigation. And I want this to be brought to the attention of as many people as possible. Please, tweet it out, share it, I think that were on the verge of discovering something yuuuuuge, as a certain someone would say. All I can say is I hope and pray that theres another explanation.
I believe that the votes cast in Minnesotas GOP primary were fake.
And, that was also about the time when you had to explain the joke: “The number in New Joisy is Et cum spiritu tuo.”
this is a clip from your second link,once again all your computer guys out thee pleas end a hand.
....................................
If you access the Minnesota GOP caucus PDF files, they are titled “Operation Malayan Water Monitor”.
http://mngop.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Statewide-53.pdf
http://mngop.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Statewide-88.pdf
The original file name is embedded in the file and what is called “Statewide-53” was originally named “Operation Malayan Water Monitor 4”.
And notice the url, they were first published in February before being updated in March. Why have placeholders in place for PDF files that were to be used briefly of all things?
What is going on? Did they decide the results beforehand? Did they forget to rename them before uploading them?
Archive as proof in case they delete the files:
Statewide.pdf
Statewide-34.pdf
Statewide-53.pdf
Statewide-70.pdf
Statewide-88.pdf
Statewide-92.pdf
sample-results
An explanation for the name could be that the acronym for Operation Malayan Water Monitor is OMWM which is also Operation Marco Wins Minnesota.
Thanks for the update!
I don’t get fox news until 2:00 pm.
I’m dependent on you guys here for analysis.
I’m trying to give Rush the benefit of the doubt,today could be very telling we shall see.
Once again brilliant essay today!!
I still suggest there is a lot of vote fraud going on.
Right in the lede it says: Trump had earlier said he'd "get along very well with Putin."
Just too good thanks Diogenesis.
Keep it right here folks (and keep the mute button handy) Rush getting no crap from Crisp.
Rush is right on target about the establishment. Predicts if the establishment can't stop Trump in the primary, they will attempt in the convention.
Excellent post! You are right there. From now on we will all view FNC as we would any other DBM network.
Rush put everything into perspective today. He thinks the final goal is to stop the Democrats. He was very critical of establishment candidates and supporters.
Wallace has been pretty straight in his questions to Rush. Rush predicts the party will eventually rally around the nominee because of the threat Hillary presents.
Rush was fair and said positive things about Trump, but obviously likes Cruz better. He likes wonks which is normal for someone like him.
He did get a shot in on Romney telegraphing a establishment coup at the convention.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.