this is a clip from your second link,once again all your computer guys out thee pleas end a hand.
....................................
If you access the Minnesota GOP caucus PDF files, they are titled “Operation Malayan Water Monitor”.
http://mngop.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Statewide-53.pdf
http://mngop.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Statewide-88.pdf
The original file name is embedded in the file and what is called “Statewide-53” was originally named “Operation Malayan Water Monitor 4”.
And notice the url, they were first published in February before being updated in March. Why have placeholders in place for PDF files that were to be used briefly of all things?
What is going on? Did they decide the results beforehand? Did they forget to rename them before uploading them?
Archive as proof in case they delete the files:
Statewide.pdf
Statewide-34.pdf
Statewide-53.pdf
Statewide-70.pdf
Statewide-88.pdf
Statewide-92.pdf
sample-results
An explanation for the name could be that the acronym for Operation Malayan Water Monitor is OMWM which is also Operation Marco Wins Minnesota.
For the IT people, here is the 4th/final thread of the hackers digging out the fraud in the MN Gop FoamBoy *win* :
http://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/66064031/rigged-polls-operation-malayan-water-monitor-4
I think any method of voting can be subject to fraud...
As Stalin was quoted as saying, “You know, comrades,” says Stalin, “that I think in regard to this: I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how.”
I think everyone who votes should show photo ID proving they are who they say they are, and then, upon voting, have their finger dipped in purple ink, like in Iraq.
Vote counting is left up the states. That it why it is absolutely essential to vote in local and state-wide politicians who are unbiased and fair. Of course, it is possible for the vote counters to skip these people and put a win in for anyone they can.
We need accountability in the voting process. Some sort of review of means and methods would go a long way.
I do not think that a computer-based fraud is ongoing. Too many cooks spoil the soup, as they say, and the biggest problem with conspiracies is that when they need to use a lot of people, the idea that no one would talk becomes less and less likely. Not impossible, but given human nature, extremely difficult.
Generally speaking, government is bureaucratic and stupid, not wily and clever.