Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pope spokesman clarifies Trump comment
The Hill ^ | 2/19/016 | Lisa Hagen

Posted on 02/19/2016 8:00:23 AM PST by ironman

A spokesperson for Pope Francis clarified the pontiff's criticism of Donald Trump's plan to build a border wall, saying that the remark wasn't "a personal attack."

"The Pope said what we already know, if we followed his teaching and positions: we shouldn't build walls, but bridges," the spokesperson said in a statement, according to CNBC. "It's his generic view, coherent with the nature of solidarity from the gospel."

"This wasn't, in any way, a personal attack or an indication on who to vote for," the spokesperson continued. "The Pope has clearly said he didn't want to get involved in the electoral campaign in the US and also said that he said what he said on the basis of what he was told [about Trump], hence giving him the benefit of the doubt."

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: francis; oops; pope; popefrancis; popefrancistrump; spokesman; trump; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: pburgh01

And then there’s Han Solo Scriptural..


41 posted on 02/19/2016 8:26:03 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

So much for the infallibility argument


42 posted on 02/19/2016 8:26:22 AM PST by Typical_Whitey (Obama has destroyed the office of the presidency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ironman

The Pope and The Donald: neither one of them sins. They always have an exclamation for what lesser people think are mistakes.


43 posted on 02/19/2016 8:26:29 AM PST by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

yep...good thing he’s not infallible or anything...

The cool thing is that Donald Trump, private citizen, is not only dictating the news media coverage across the US, but now setting the agenda for the Vatican too.

BTW, he could tear down that old wall you have and replace it with a big fat beautiful new wall! And make the Muslims pay for it!


44 posted on 02/19/2016 8:27:34 AM PST by bigbob ("Victorious warriors win first and then go to war" Sun Tzu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: detch

He’s given me goose bumps since Beneduct left—and not in a good way. That silly Stanley a Laurel smile does not make it to his eyes. Did you see how his beatific expression changed when jostled by the crowd? Reminded me of the Bilbo at Rivendell, when he saw the ring on Frodo-


45 posted on 02/19/2016 8:29:16 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: RoosterRedux

Thanks, I was trying to remember who said the Pope would try to ‘clarify’ his statements.


46 posted on 02/19/2016 8:29:22 AM PST by AuntB (Illegal immigration is simply more "share the wealth" socialism and a CRIME not a race!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jane Austen
The Pope did say it. Now his backtracking shows he is not only a lefty but dishonest.

He and his leftist cohorts are dishonestly misrepresenting Catholic teaching.

POPE BENEDICT SAYS NATIONS HAVE THE RIGHT TO SECURE THEIR BORDERS "Pope Benedict XVI reiterated the Catholic church's position on immigration, saying that nations have the right to regulate the flow of migrants and secure their borders. His comment is consistent with what the church has said in the past, but contradicts the position of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

In his statement, Pope Benedict XVI said individuals have the right to leave their country, but that doesn't mean that nations have to take them in.

"At the same time, states have the right to regulate migration flows and to defend their own frontiers, always guaranteeing the respect due to the dignity of each and every human person," Pope Benedict XVI said..."

47 posted on 02/19/2016 8:30:01 AM PST by BlatherNaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan

Kinda like Barry.


48 posted on 02/19/2016 8:30:26 AM PST by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jjotto
Pope Frankie and Obama should quit living a lie and get hitched.

They could get married in one of those sleazy Vegas chapels and The Donald could perform the ceremony reading from 3 Corinthians.

49 posted on 02/19/2016 8:31:23 AM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: rainee
The Pope “misspoke”?

He is misunderstood because he misremembers. One mouth two ears Pope. Read yer bible. Nevermind.

50 posted on 02/19/2016 8:32:37 AM PST by showme_the_Glory ((ILLEGAL: prohibited by law. ALIEN: Owing political allegiance to another country or government))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ironman

51 posted on 02/19/2016 8:32:59 AM PST by georgiegirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ironman
I seem to recall a story of antiquity about a great nation state that excelled at building bridges.

They were the Persian Empire they built a bridge all the way to Grease. It did not turn out well.

52 posted on 02/19/2016 8:33:24 AM PST by usurper (Liberals GET OFF MY LAWN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

I’m sure The Donald would invite Hillary as a witness.


53 posted on 02/19/2016 8:34:39 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Lib-Lickers 2

Why doesn’t the Pope move the Vatican to Mexico or Cuba or his home country, Argentina, the sinful domain of the Perons? Keep & stay out of American politics, you communist/socialist swine!!! Oh...by the way, this comment is from a life long, devout Roman Catholic who is ashamed of the leadership in his church. This unbalnced nutcase of a Pope, should publicly apoligize to Donald John Trump!!!


54 posted on 02/19/2016 8:35:31 AM PST by JLAGRAYFOX (Defeat Hillary Clinton & totally destroy the entire Democrat Party, politically!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ironman

Aaaaaaaaand here we go again with someone having to walk back yet another of the Pope’s moronic not so Christian statements. Please, someone, anyone, ping the Cardinals for another conclave.


55 posted on 02/19/2016 8:40:04 AM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We still do not know exactly how people are infected with Ebola")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ironman

you would build a wall and NOT a bridge if invaders were coming...


56 posted on 02/19/2016 8:40:08 AM PST by Mr. K (Trump/Cruz 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ironman

“Honestly Don, that hard kick we aim at your groin every day, gee ... it’s nothing personal.”
Pope Frank, Murdoch, Cruz, Priebus, the MSM, et al/


57 posted on 02/19/2016 8:42:22 AM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ironman
"The Pope said what we already know, if we followed his teaching and positions: we shouldn't build walls, but bridges,"

This is gibberish. Is he speaking literally or figuratively? If he's speaking figuratively then it has nothing to do with a border wall with Mexico, it merely means the message of the Gospel should be open to everyone. If he's speaking literally then it's non-biblical nonsense as the bible tells us of God commanding his people to build a border wall around Jerusalem and he never orders or even talks about literal bridges at all.

58 posted on 02/19/2016 8:46:28 AM PST by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ironman

Kasich: “I’m going to side with the Pope on this one.”

I must have missed the Commandment that says “Thou Shall Commit National Suicide If Some Old Fool Marxist Who Lives In Italy Says So.”

Oh and BTW: Mr. Pope, I know Christians. And you sir, are no Christian.


59 posted on 02/19/2016 8:47:03 AM PST by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redmen4ever

“exclamation” = explanation

(but maybe with an exclamation)


60 posted on 02/19/2016 8:47:47 AM PST by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson