[jazusamo]

Well of course hypocrite 0bama regrets his filibuster now, the shoe's on the other foot.

[SE Mom]

Liar. He regrets nothing about it except that it failed.

[areukiddingme1]

“White House says Obama ‘regrets’ filibuster against Alito nomination in 2006”

Aaaahhhhaaaahhhhaaaaaa, hey obamadork, ain’t life a MF’er...all the history and recorded record of stuff. OMG he is a F’n idiot — And the takers elected his dumb a$$ twice...how pathetic.

Don’t worry, the Senate Republicans can “regret” their filibuster against your POS nominee too...

[Seaplaner]

"These are two different things," said White House press secretary Josh Earnest.

"Die grosse Luge" von Joseph Goebbels

.

[DoughtyOne]

[aquila48]

What the Republicans need to do is ask themselves “What would the dems do in our position?”

Then they’ll know what to do.

[struggle]

OH, well all is healed between us then.

[ealgeone]

Payback baby....payback.

[PhilDragoo]

Hoist on his own petard. Goosed by his own gander. Confronted with his hideous visage in the mirrah.

[Bob434]

I’ll bet he does- enjoy the current filibuster buster

[VerySadAmerican]

Isn’t that special!

[DoodleDawg]

Well of course hypocrite 0bama regrets his filibuster now, the shoe's on the other foot.

The reason why the Alito filibuster went nowhere was because there were more than enough Democrats who said they would not vote to uphold it. So will the Democrats try and turn it around now and say that since they worked in a bipartisan fashion to bring Alito's nomination to a vote, the Republicans should do the same for Obama's nominee?

[Political Junkie Too]

Then Obama will understand why Republicans regret not holding hearings now.

-PJ

[Logical me]

I wish I could use my fifties military language to express my feelings against this black Muslim terrorists our bast—d king.

Lord please forgive me for evening thinking the words.

Trump for President. And after ship that black garbage back to his homeland in the deepest hut with dirt floor.

[Durbin]

Then Republicans should make it the same thing. Veto anyone he puts forward. then claim to regret it 10 years later like he did. there. Problem solved.

[jdege]

Nothing any of the Republicans have said in any way prevents Obama from nominating a replacement.

What he should do is to nominate a moderate Republican - someone who, if he'd been nominated by a Republican, would have easily been confirmed.

That would make it very difficult for the GOP leadership to refuse to consider him.

What he's likely to do, instead, though, is to nominate some wack-job leftist.

Obama Compiles Shortlist Of Gay, Transsexual Abortion Doctors To Replace Scalia

[catnipman]

“the White House said Wednesday that President Obama “regrets” his filibuster against Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito in 2006, but insisted the situation was different”

Absolutely it’s different: that was then when Obama DIDN’T regret his filibuster and now Obama DOES regret his filibuster. BIG, BIG difference, hey?

[Sgt_Schultze]

That’s okay. And in fairness, he should allow Republicans to feel the pain of the same “regret” he describes - ten years from now.

[IronJack]

Oh, the old "that's different" defense ...

Yeah, my first-grader uses that one all the time.

[poinq]

Of course the dems would do the exact same thing. Harry Reid would, of course, delay the nomination. OF COURSE, NOT A DOUBT IN THE WORLD.

[Washi]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!