Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child

So you are saying we were irresponsible to have used them when we did? However, WMD extends to more than just nuclear weapons, so your statement doesn’t pass as valid.


108 posted on 02/15/2016 6:07:53 AM PST by Robert DeLong (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: Robert DeLong
So you are saying we were irresponsible to have used them when we did? However, WMD extends to more than just nuclear weapons, so your statement doesn’t pass as valid.

True; if one follows the news, there have been stories of ISIS having WMDs these past few days and the stories are not talking about even dirty bombs, they are talking about chemical weapons.

113 posted on 02/15/2016 7:32:31 AM PST by BeadCounter (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

To: Robert DeLong
So you are saying we were irresponsible to have used them when we did?

Yes. There is no legal, ethical or moral principle that would ever allow for the indiscriminate targeting of civilians in a military campaign.

128 posted on 02/15/2016 11:08:14 AM PST by Alberta's Child (My mama said: "To get things done, you'd better not mess with Major Tom.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson