Posted on 02/10/2016 7:36:10 AM PST by C19fan
Donald Trump won a convincing victory in New Hampshire. We congratulate him, and hope that we will not have to do it many more times.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
I have deleted the entire Fox lineup and channel from my DirectV menus and options. I don’t even see those channels any more.
If I could ala carte delete them, I would.
NRO redefining conservatism the same way the democrats redefined life.
Yeah, Eminent Domain is more important than our country being flooded with third worlders, and our manufacturing destroyed.
In fact, and the TRUTH is-
IT WAS A BAD NIGHT FOR CONSERVATIVE REVIEW LAST NIGHT!
Twitter: “Erick Erickson â@EWErickson 14h14 hours ago
I never thought I’d say this, but thank God for Donald Trump tonight stopping John Kasich. Between the two I am #TeamTrump all the way.”
“’Conservative’ and ‘liberal’ are SO over.”
Why bother posting on “premier online gathering place for independent, grass-roots conservatism on the web” then?
NRO doing its best to define conservatism as republican party uber alles.
Love it.
It was a bad night for National Review, hopefully, the beginning of many.
The Title “Conservative’” has become meaningless.
Eh, force of habit—I did go to the site. Let me post a little of their rather amusing pathetic drivel.
Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio each have their merits, but neither of them has cracked the top two yet. Both of them have something to prove now. After a performance at the last debate that even he now admits was disappointing, Rubio has to show that he can come back from adversity: that he is a man of real substance, not just a pretty face.
Bush, meanwhile, has to show that his campaign is about more than fundraising and endorsements, even with policy papers in the background. His diffidence, his ambivalence about leading todayâs Republicans, his tendency to gaffes: All of them have to be buried.
Since Trump won it.
Before that, it was the bellwether to identify the most liberal of the Republican candidates.
If you expect to have any form of consistency with the past from Trump fans, you are going to become frustrated.
Maybe its time for a change, how about, a meeting place for Patriots and Nationalist.
?????????????? Really?
If this is for reals then I guess Cheeseburger Erick has finally figured out he’ll be out in the cold, cold Turkey-ville if Trump wins the nomination.
The editors of NR wouldn’t know conservative if it hit them upside the head.
They think it’s conservative to abandon the rule of law and surrender the country to fraudulenlty documented foreigners and their employers.
They are part of The Ministry of Propaganda working for The Cheap Labor Express.
That’s okay, in the end JEB or rubio will get the nomination, courtesy of a brokered GOP convention. Trump will drop off the radar, Cruz will be a lame-duck one term senator facing some sort of contrived charges, and the GOP will be laughing their asses off at how the “conservatives” assasinated their own candidates yet again.
One big fact lost on the people here: voters (meaning you) DO not choose the candidates, the party chooses the candidates. If the peasants choose to go against that dogma, well then the party will just changes the rules, or outright tell you who WILL be the candidate. Hence all of the flack the not-chosen candidates are receiving from the party elite and their media lackeys.
It was a well deserved bad night for National Review.
It was a good night for conservatives.
To push nationalism, of course.
“Cam Newton impersonation”
LOL!
I just wish they’d say ‘Vichy conservatives’ instead of ‘conservatives...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.