Posted on 02/05/2016 4:22:42 AM PST by Biggirl
National Journal Senior Political Columnist Ron Fournier argued that Democratic presidential candidate former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s explanation for her emails and private server “was wrong in at least three points†and that “she’s got to know all three of those things are wrong†during the Fox News Channel’s coverage of the Democratic presidential debate.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Hillary Clinton is a lying, thieving, killing, dirty little snot.
The only people who support Hillary Clinton are the people paid by her.
They don’t mind that she’s a lying, thieving, killing, dirty little snot as long as they get money from her.
But that doesn't explain the millions of ordinary dunces who will vote for her.
Boy, if Ron F is against you...
Fear and greed are two very strong human emotions.
The Democrat Party use these emotions to get people to vote Democrat.
We sit here on Free Republic making logical, reasoned arguments for why people should be conservative. That takes a long time.
The Democrats just frighten and bribe. That’s fast and easy.
That’s why 47% of the voters will always vote Democrat.
Until the Republican leaders learn how to appeal to these voters, we are always going to start 47 points behind.
I worked with classified material up to Top Secret for 24 years. As a proposal coordinator for a major aerospace firm I was often handed material up to Top Secret (but totally unmarked as such) generated by engineers and scientists. I was expected to handle, control, and mark such material appropriately from the moment it came into my hands. Citing material not marked classified as an excuse to mishandle it, and even compromise it, especially coming from the top executive in an agency, is utterly ludicrous and indefensible.
The “classified after the fact” line is clearly a lie.
The TS data was MARKED as such at the time, and the fact that she ordered those markings removed and then transmitted, only compounds the felony.
She set out to operate in this manner by not setting up at least 2, and more likely 3, separate computers, either in her office or her home.
a-Gov’t Unclass
b-Gov’t Classified
c-Gov’t SAP
“Who are you going to believe, me or that lying book I sold and signed copies of?”
You are so right, lil Ron is such a puke!
That's why 47% of the voters will always vote Democrat.
Until the Republican leaders learn how to appeal to these voters, we are always going to start 47 points behind.
That's probably not going to happen. This is a character issue we are dealing with here, not just a political one.
Without an internal concept of right and wrong and the personal desire to do the "right" thing, the wicked will always support the wicked because there is "something in it" for them.
It's the culture and the people who need to be changed.
I thought I heard shortly after the story of the emails that the State Department is not going to release started coming out that some classified emails were found on Hillary’s server that had been “wiped clean, like with a cloth”, but I haven’t heard anything more about it.
Can someone update me - I only have a public education.
And, if that is true, isn’t her story that that she only destroyed private emails become yet another lie???
Hillary is so vulgar, I’ll even vote for Cruz v. Hillary if he is the nominee :)
Yes, you are right.
And I have stood on my moral high ground for decades and watched my nation go bankrupt (morally and financially) while Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid and the Clintons stole and became rich.
We are the Boogie Men to Democrat voters. They throw rocks at us while the Democrat leaders pick their pockets and cheer them on.
The Democrat leaders in Flint, MI have given the Democrats there poison and the Democrats still support them.
Flint, Mi is just a big Jonestown, and the American Press turn their backs and hide in the corner hollering that it must be the Republican Boogie Man’s fault.
These are the latest allegations coming from the Clinton camp...that Powell & Rice "received" classified e-mails on their personal accounts.
I would maintain that "receiving" an e-mail is vastly different than "communicating" through e-mail. Anyone can send anything to a personal e-mail address. Granted, there can be electronic security bots and agents that scrub e-mails for viruses and what not, but receiving alone is not a crime.
You must also ask the question, "WHO sent the classified e-mail?" Was this a regular practice for Powell & Rice, and did they order their staffs to communicate like this--"off the grid," so to speak? Furthermore, what did Powell & Rice do with the e-mails they received, if in fact they were classified? Did they self-report it, so that an investigation could occur?
This story is clearly one of intent, and the Powell/Rice e-mail is a red herring. Once again, Hillary is trying to run out the clock, hoping the public becomes tired of "her damned e-mails..."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.