Posted on 01/28/2016 8:05:52 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Good news and bad news for Trump fans from Nate Cohn. The good news: If you’re looking for evidence that Monday night’s electorate will include a bunch of people who’ve never voted Republican before, which probably means a stronger than expected showing for Trump, here you go. New registrations for the GOP are up from where they were in 2012:
This is what the figures look like corrected AND with new data. It's a completely different story. pic.twitter.com/sbYDUchlo3
— Nate Cohn (@Nate_Cohn) January 28, 2016
Those are dismal numbers for Bernie Sanders, who’s hoping to bring his own surge of independents and disaffected liberals into the Democratic caucus, but an encouraging sign for Trump. The bad news is that new registrations aren’t as robust as you might expect given the size of Trump’s media megaphone. As you can see, the GOP’s only about 1,000 new registrants ahead of where it was in the dismal 2012 primary. Several thousand more new Democrats were registered in 2008 at this point than new Republicans have registered this year. Which is easily explained: The Obama phenomenon was carried along not just by his media platform but by a world-beating organization with a terrific GOTV operation. Obama had to work to get his voters to caucus, even with the press swooning over him. How’s Trump doing with the other part of the “media + ground game” equation? Anecdotal evidence says … not well:
"They called me the othÂer night and said I'd be a preÂcinct capÂtain," she said as she stood in snow flurÂries waitÂing to enter a Trump rally. The job enÂtails callÂing othÂer poÂtenÂtial Trump supÂportÂers in MarÂshall County to reÂmind them to turn out Monday night at 7 p.m. Of course, to do that she needs names and phone numÂbers—which, as of earliÂer this week, she still had not reÂceived.
"I've asked for a list, and there's only a few days left, so I hope it's soon," she said…
Also in the neighÂborÂhood, in yet anÂothÂer ofÂfice park, was the Trump Iowa headquarÂters, where it was less clear what activÂity was takÂing place. A Trump staffer deÂclined to give NaÂtionÂal JournÂal acÂcess to anyÂthing beyÂond the entryÂway. In the course of an hour, not a single staff memÂber or voÂlunÂteer entered or exÂited the buildÂing.
The next day, at a nearby call cenÂter hired by Trump for phone-bankÂing, only eight voÂlunÂteers had signed in by midÂday—by which time othÂer camÂpaigns would have twice or three times as many people workÂing the phones.
Ace wonders why Trump, whose resources are basically inexhaustible, skimped on pouring money into his GOTV effort. That’s one of the great mysteries of the primary. He could have buried the other candidates with attack ads and field troops, and although critics would have screamed he was buying the nomination, most of the party would have shrugged. That’s one of Trump’s core invulnerabilities — he flaunts his wealth so much that there’s no way to shame him for enjoying it the way the left continuously shamed Romney for it. If he wanted to spend $200 million to destroy Cruz, he would have just said, “It’s my money, I worked hard for it,” and everyone apart from Cruz fans would have high-fived. But he hasn’t done that. Why come this far, leading the polls for the duration of the primary, only to get out-organized in the only poll that counts?
Aha, but what about new registrations on caucus day? Political junkies know by now that anyone can walk in on Monday night, register, and participate. Maybe the big surge is still to come. Maybe, but Cohn notes that that isn’t how it’s worked in the past, even for the Obama phenomenon:
The number of active registered voters increased by about 16,000 between January and February in 2008, and many of those newly registered voters didn't vote or participate in the G.O.P. race. It seems reasonable to assume that around 10,000 newly registered voters participated in the 2008 Democratic primary, or only about 4 percent of the electorate.
Most of the increase in turnout for Mr. Obama came from voters who were already registered but hadn't previously participated in the caucus, not from people who had not yet registered to vote.
Could be that Trumpmania will rely on the same sort of already-registered-but-disaffected voters that Obama did, in which case maybe the new-registrant numbers aren’t capturing the size of the wave that’s coming. For the record, though, the best caucus turnout the GOP’s ever had was 122,000 people in 2012. Monmouth assumed turnout of 170,000 people in its poll yesterday showing Trump leading Cruz by seven points. A more modest turnout of 130,000, which would still be record-setting, would produce … a dead heat between Cruz and Trump at 26 percent each. There’s more good news and potential bad news for Trumpers in that. The good news is that Trump has now gained enough on Cruz that he’s a threat to win even if there isn’t the sort of blockbuster gate-crashing among his fans that he’s hoping for. The bad news is that, if Cruz is out-organizing him in terms of turning out likely voters, maybe he’s also out-organizing him in registering people (and convincing registered-but-disaffected Republicans who support him to show up). Trump isn’t going to win all the first-time caucusgoers, after all. Whether he wins Iowa depends on his margin over Cruz in that category. The fact that the indicators for newbies on Monday night aren’t off the charts suggests that margin will be smaller than expected.
For more on the turnout numbers in Iowa, read streiff at Red State, who notes that Republican registrations are actually down from where they were a year ago. That’ll probably change as of Monday, when some people join the party to caucus, but it’s not the trend that a Trump fan wants to see.
Huh. Thought I’d read differently but suppose I could have confused NH proceedure with Iowas. Interesting that the rules don’t say anything about a second ballot. I know here in WA we were careful to include language regarding release of delegates after the first ballot. Because...lawyers!
Also, did you read that rule #2? That if the first ballot at the convention only has one name, they all have to vote for him/her? Seems... I don’t know, odd.
...barely. The big news: No surge of Trump voters.
Auditing all departments and agencies and eliminating fraud and waste, down sizing useless government workers is needed. From Fed down to County levels.
Who is going to invest with no jobs after 8 yrs of DUMBO ruining our economy and eliminating jobs in the US? Sure not the average Joe or Jane Doe who can barely keep their heads above water now.
The GOP hasn’t gone to a second ballot since 1948. There are a lot of reasons that won’t happen again this cycle.
And a lot of reasons that it could.
“I seem to recall a fella like that...
Give us Barabbas!!!”
Well Trump my think he is as great Jesus Christ....but he aint even close.
That is definitely a minority opinion here. A bunch of Trump supporters admit he is not a Conservative but don't care.
1992 - Republicans nominated a non-conservative George HW Bush
1996 - Republicans nominated a non-conservative Bob Dole
2000 - Republicans nominated a pseudo-conservative George W Bush
2008 - Republicans nominated a non-conservative John McCain
2012 - Republicans nominated a non-conservative Mitt Romney
2016 - Republicans might nominate a non-conservative Donald Trump
Repeating the same thing hoping for a different result is _______. Fill in the blanks.
Hog wash. Cruz is simply un-electable period. Even Senior Amnesty has a chance, but Cruz no one in hell.
Great anti-Trump talking points , but the only problem is, they are all false .. Trump is a Paleo Conservative , which truly is the only type of real Conservative .. you tried but you failed
A bunch of Romney supporters KNEW he was not a Conservative or a Christian; but didn't care; as long as they thought they could get rid of Obama.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.