[butterdezillion]

I hear what you’re saying.

Could you write a summary that ties it all together, with some of the words clickable to the link that supports each specific claim? Sometimes that makes it easier to follow the meat of the argument without being intimidated or confused by the sheer length of the comment, and yet allows skeptics to see the substantiation easily.

I don’t know how to do the HTML coding to get it to work that way, which is one reason I write in Wordpress and than transfer the writing to here, when I want to post detailed documentation. That could be an option for you too, or if you’re handy with HTML (or have somebody who could coach you through it) you could do it that way.

Does that make sense? I know the frustration. People call it a wild, crazy claim if you don’t document your reasons but if you document your reasons they say it’s too long. sigh.

[ETL]

Could you write a summary that ties it all together, with some of the words clickable to the link that supports each specific claim? Sometimes that makes it easier to follow the meat of the argument without being intimidated or confused by the sheer length of the comment, and yet allows skeptics to see the substantiation easily.

Good idea, although I'd rather have these important facts out there in bold type front and center. Some people need to be knocked over the head for them to wake up and know what's going on. However, I will consider it. It could potentially work.