Posted on 01/23/2016 4:57:25 AM PST by Steven Tyler
What Happens When You Put Kambree and Defending U.S.A. Together?…
Three minutes of awesome. Remarkable piece of marketing. Actually, goes to the source of support for both Cruz and Trump.
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/2016/01/23/what-happens-when-you-put-kambree-and-defending-u-s-a-together/
GOPe, "Media" puntdits, Karl Rove, you all are going to need moar ice!
PS to Freepers, we are all Conservative, and yes we all express ourselves in different ways.
Also, if JEB! had listened to people BEFORE building his election platform, we would all be in a different place January 23, 2016
Bookmark
Yeah that’s pretty good
The National Review issue that attacks Trump will only inspire his supporters. In fact, it may wind up being the final boost in Iowa that gives Donald the nomination.
It has to do with pulling the GOPe knife out of my back every two years. I've had it up to my neck in Washington political sewage and want a grenade thrower to change the imminent rush over the cliff edge that is surely coming.
I agree. I already watched the video 3 times.
She nailed it.
The National Review issue that attacks Trump will only inspire his supporters. In fact, it may wind up being the final boost in Iowa that gives Donald the nomination.
National Review just handed Donald Trump the Election
Republican Newswatch ^ | 1/22/16 | DOUG IBENDAHL
Posted on 1/22/2016, 8:39:33 PM by Amntn
National Review’s publication of the collective anti-Donald Trump missives from 22 self-appointed conservative potentates has caused quite a stir in Republican circles.
The nationwide responses range from, “Wait, I thought National Review went out of business years ago,” to “Ed Meese? Seriously?”
The Gang of 22 have officially become parodies of themselves. One would have to reach back to the days of Richard Nixon and Spiro Agnew to lift an adequate quote to describe them.
“Nattering nabobs of negativism,” “vicars of vacillation,” “pusillanimous pussyfooters,” “the decadent few,” “ideological eunuchs,” “the effete corps of impudent snobs,” or “the hopeless, hysterical hypochondriacs of history” - take your pick, because they all apply about equally well to each and every one of them.
So clueless is the Gang of 22 they can’t even see how they’ve stumbled right into the narrative Trump’s been communicating so successfully for months. Just like the elected officials from both parties, the Gang of 22 has been GREAT at complaining about stuff, year, after year, after year.
But getting anything accomplished? Not so much.
Many of the Gang of 22 have been hanging around and chattering for decades, and some are active cogs in the Conservative Entertainment Complex, deriving their income by pandering to conservative anger while offering no real solutions.
Donald Trump represents a threat to these ineffectual poohbahs in the same way he represents a threat to do-nothing public officials.
Jealousy is also seriously at work here. Trump is inspiring and exciting a broad spectrum of the country like no member of the Gang of 22 ever has, or ever will.
In just seven months of campaigning, Trump already has more Americans listening to a Republican message than the entire Gang of 22 could muster over decades. Trump understands that before you can advance the ball, you have to convince people to take time from their busy lives to listen. No one on the GOP side since Ronald Reagan has accomplished that like Trump.
No one else has come close, and certainly no one from that “effete corps of impudent snobs” to which the National Review thinks we should defer.
The Gang of 22 had their chance. They’ve done a lot of bitching over the years, and it paid well for some.
But Americans care about results. They can plainly see that all of the empty talk from the Gang of 22 got us eight years of Barack Obama, and a loss in pretty much every conservative battle there was to lose.
At the same time when Americans look at Donald Trump’s life they get a lot of assurance that here is finally a man who shares their focus on actually getting results. And Trump returns the respect by recognizing regular hard-working Americans are a lot smarter than any of the “ideological eunuchs” in all of their pontificating glory.
The “pusillanimous pussyfooters” love to nitpick Trump’s words, but what voters are looking for this year is competence and accomplishment. Donald Trump has an actual record of delivering both in spades.
The Gang of 22 is right to be terrified. A President who could get things done would expose them as the irrelevant creatures they truly are.
It can’t happen fast enough.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3387420/posts
Wow.
I’m a conservative because I get to define what conservative is.
In describing herself, she just also described every GOPe officeholder at election time.
And of course, Trump is also a conservative because I get to define him how I want to be so. She also described the whole Trump movement, actual objective measures of conservatism be damned.
This is what it is for me. My support for Trump has nothing to do with his positions 3+ years ago.
It has to do with pulling the GOPe knife out of my back every two years. ...
************
Blind trust regardless of track record? We all want the knife out. But we cannot ignore what an office seeker has said and done in the past.
WOW WOW WOW !
Her anger is totally justified.
These critics watched the past 7 years as Obama laid waste to our military, sold weapons to the drug lords, went to war with Christians, let the IRS savage the TEA Party and nobody was held accountable.
Try again. She didn’t say that she gets to define what it is. She said the people whining about Trump’s conservatism are failures who never got anything done.
Trump is establishment. He funded Boehner’s and McConnell’s attacks on the tea party movement.
He has the support (if not formal endorsement) of every worst Vichy Republican there is: Bob Dole, Trent Lott, Mitch McConnell, Orin Hatch, Bob Barr.
He has now “fleshed out” his opposition to illegal immigration enough that we know what he supports is a “touchback amnesty,” which is great if your only immigration concern is tracking terrorists, but sucks if your concerns include rewarding lawlessness, cultural Balkanization, Democrats winning through demographic manipulation, the destruction of the middle class...
He supports abortion rights, health-care nationalization with mandates, tax hikes, massive increases in social spending...
It’s blind trust no matter who you vote for. Who do you think put the knives in our back to begin with?
WOW! YES, HOORAY Kambree! Thank you.
the old order changes, yielding place to the new
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.