Posted on 01/22/2016 4:35:50 PM PST by detective
If you thought the Republican establishment was finally getting used to the idea that Donald Trump could become the party's nominee for president, the National Review would like to set the record straight.
That's because the conservative magazine, according to CNN, will release on Friday an edition in which it declares that Trump is a threat to conservatism and that it officially opposes his candidacy. Included in the edition will be 22 conservative voices who have written essays to describe why Trump is a bad idea for the party.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
Your party? You don’t own s**t. Now YOU get lost!
These are ‘Paul Ryan Conservatives’.
Thank you, Mr. Rove, for your suggestion but take a hike.
22 cons
And You do? What have you been Smoking Joe?
check out the nmes on here mostly all on fox news
Trump was for amnesty before he was against it. Oh wait, Trump is still for amnesty.
They’re all more conservative than Trump.
https://youtu.be/4CwVrfydjOI teddy boy 2013
Maybe. But I think the Socialist label is still going to make even liberals think twice. After Trump explains to them exactly what socialism means to their wallets.
1. If they actually want Trump to win but can't come out and admit it, then this would be a good way to have him distance himself from the "hard-core right" in the general election.
2. If Trump turns out to be a complete disaster, they can look back and say, "I told you so!"
They rest belong in a School to learn what a conservative really is and they haven't a Popular vote winner except for W, in 2004 and GH because of Reagan.
So what Great Conservative have they backed?
Dole, Mc Cain and the creator of Obamacare, Romney
People did what they asked gave money, time and voted for promises to stop Obama.
Didn't happened where is the Editorial, baby Rich.
I am not the one that claimed I owed the party. Your fellow retarded Trump did.
Trump is leading a rebellion against the entrenched establishment of both parties. This must be stopped.
Why would any Trump supporter care?
How much did the Bush people pay National Review? Ladies and gentlemen follow the money. They all just got together really now and felt it was the right thing to do. How much were they paid?
As long as you take a jump over a very steep cliff first, Mr Deblasio.
Magua, you’re such a cynic......
Yeah, rights - and these “leaders” were just so equally outspoken in holding the so-called “conservative” cohorts in Congress accountable when their vote enabled the Ryan abomination that some call a “budget.”
These ass-clowns no longer have credibility - and they’ll get steamrolled too.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.