Posted on 01/09/2016 8:42:14 PM PST by randita
Other constitutional authorities disagree with you.
In September Trump said he had no "concerns" (as in "troll") , about Cruz's elgibility. Cruz begins to challenge him for the lead in Iowa polls and now he's "oh so concerned" .
But have to agree that probably the dems will attack Cruz over this big nothingburger.
They (dems) attack-It's what they do. Cruz is a top flight lawyer. He will be able to handle any legal BS they throw at him.
I hope everyone knows they (dems) will be coming after Trump with whatever they can find, distort , or outright lie about, too.
So I guess, instead of supporting a rock solid conservative who is well versed in the Constitution- We need to be fearful, and focus on what attacks the democrats are likely to launch against a candidate, make our choice based on that. So we should vote for whoever the dems like best- Riiight...
any accuser has to feeling far more than thinking on this one.
who in there right mind running for a POTUS candidacy would try to GET OVER on eligibility?
someone this were “foolish”
HUGE DITTOS to your post!!!!!!!!!!
Deport Cruz and Bieber.
What and Donald Trump is George Washington? LOL!
I’d take all this a lot more seriously if it weren’t such a transparent effort to discredit the man who will give us the best chance we have to restore the rule of law in this nation.
Sorry, but please don’t ask me to replace a narcissistic egomaniacal self-absorbed power-mad statist with another narcissistic egomaniacal self-absorbed power-mad statist and try to sell this to me as some sort of change. It’s not. It’s more of the same. It’s the “new boss same as the old boss”.
We Americans don’t need a boss. We need a faithful servant.
????????? what on earth has Free Republic become!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If SCOTUS won’t take it then a lower court’s ruling would stand - whatever that would be. That’s how the process works. Why are people upset if Trump wants a legal answer to an issue about which there is obviously divided opinion in the voting public?
If Trump sued Cruz and Cruz’s (partial) defense was that Obama as a foreign-born POTUS set a precedent, then at least Kagan should recuse herself if it ever came before POTUS, because she was the Solicitor General when Obama eligibility suits were first brought forward. She didn’t recuse herself in the past when she should have, but I think Trump could make a stink that could make her awfully uncomfortable if she didn’t recuse herself.
And I think he would do that because it would fit his claim that the voting public needs a decision that’s not corrupt and doesn’t leave the public with the same questions they started out with.
Cruz, too, would want Kagan to recuse herself because she is a political hack who would easily sell the country and Constitution short for the sake of her political cronies.
And if, by the time the case is heard, Trump was leading he might want Cruz legally cleared to be his VP. Or if Cruz is leading, Trump may want him cleared so Trump could be his VP (probably not, though) or (more likely) they could keep Jeb or another RINO from winning.
Both guys, though, would be more likely to consider doing this if they knew that their supporters are adult and patriotic enough to realize the need for a legally-binding answer as the system is supposed to work. Does any of us really want Congress deciding who can be POTUS? They’d put known Syrian illegal refugees who’ve sworn allegiance to ISIS in the White House. (And if you don’t believe that just consider what they’ve enabled Obama to do). The Constitution gives the JUDICIARY the job of interpreting the Constitution and deciding cases both as to fact and to interpretation. Congress, by contrast, is given the job of counting the votes and checking to make sure that the electoral votes are properly certified. They are given the right to determine eligibility of their own members but never given either the right or the responsibility to interpret or rule on Constitutional issues such as Presidential eligibility.
Part of the whole point of both Cruz and Trump is that the people within the system are so corrupt that America isn’t really even America any more.
Yes, the courts suck. And I believe they may have been threatened also, with Obama’s suits. But I think Trump knows what happened, and so far the things he’s done have preempted the same old war plans that our enemies have used. He’s dodging their traps because he knows their game plan. Same thing with Cruz. Now if their supporters will recognize what’s going on and refuse to swallow our enemies’ bait, those 2 can get this done, together.
Don’t have a big problem giving a benefit of the doubt.....
All along I had some thoughts that these two had something cooking behind the scenes.
The pudding’s proof will be if Cruz takes Iowa and if so if Trump keeps up the nasty inferential yapping.
Yet still that “simplest answer” thingy keeps peeping over the edge like some mischievous gremlin.
Faithful SERVANT= TED CRUZ...
I really liked that post.
Some of us were saying years ago that the democrat plan could be to wait until we’ve got a candidate and then use the courts to disqualify him somehow, making their candidate a shoe-in.
The more I think about this, the more I think Trump needs to realize that the way to stop that from happening if it looks like Cruz could be the R nominee is by making sure it is settled during the PRIMARY. That’s what Trump is saying. I don’t think Cruz can get a declaration from a judge; it has to be a decision, and that can only happen if there’s been an actual case. And the only way for there to be a case during the PRIMARY (before it’s too late to make sure there is an eligible candidate against Hillary) is if he files a lawsuit.
Things are being set up for this to happen, I think. And if all the R’s would realize the importance of getting it ironed out during the PRIMARY, they would be thanking Trump for this. Because a really good chance for having a POTUS who will buck the corrupt status quo in DC would be out the door and Hillary would be a shoe-in if this isn’t dealt with during the PRIMARY.
Please, people, think it through. We know the issue isn’t going to just go away even if Trump drops this, because Grayson says he will file suit if Cruz is the nominee. Cruz supporters (and I am one) need to realize that if this isn’t dealt with at the PRIMARY level, Hillary could be handed the White House by the black robes. NONE of us wants that.
Except maybe the bottom feeders in Congress who don’t want an interruption to the status quo...
Do the people at FR really want to side with the GOPe? If so, why?
So let’s get a legal ruling.
Right? Isn’t that how it’s supposed to work?
If you have standing, do it!
How would you propose to make sure that the dems don’t bribe a judge to disqualify Cruz when Grayson files suit - when it’s too late for the R’s to have any other candidate?
You and I both want change. Is Hillary the change you’re looking for? Because if this isn’t dealt with during the PRIMARY, dem bribery could make her a shoe-in. How would you stop that?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.