Posted on 01/08/2016 2:15:25 PM PST by doug from upland
NOTE: first sentence - "marital infidelity"
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Donald Trump seems to view his role as the person who dredges up what nobody else wants to talk about. And so he has dragged out Bill Clinton's marital infidelity.
The former president's "terrible record of women abuse" should be considered as Hillary Clinton runs for president, said Mr. Trump. After Mrs. Clinton responded to a boorish remark by Mr. Trump by talking about his "penchant for sexism," Mr. Trump declared, "If Hillary thinks she can unleash her husband, with his terrible record of women abuse, while playing the women's card on me, she's wrong!"
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
It’s using a young intern, travelling multiple times to a convicted pedophile’s estate and RAPE!
Not only “marital infidelity” you MSM pieces of sh**!!!!
THIS NEEDS TO BE SPREAD FAR AND WIDE
This along with the above post of many more women than we knew about. The timing is perfect considering Bill Cosby is in the news. Hehehehehe
No other Republican candidate would have had the balls to do what trump did.
He castrated Hillarys “war on women” strategy.
You could just taste the fear/wishful thinking in that opinion piece.
This election is fun!
I guess, in one sense, its “marital infidelity” if you push a woman down, rip her pants open and put your genitals in her face and force yourself on her.
Wrong it isn’t about Bill Clinton’s “marital infidelity” its about Bill Clinton’s history of sexual abuse. He’s a rapist and sexual harasser who used his position to target use and abuse women.
The Clinton apologists are bending over backwards to defend him. That could be a very dangerous position in the presence of Bill Clinton.
The weird thing is that Trump himself was also a serial womanizer and met his second two wives while he was still married to their predecessors - and appears to have had a lot of fun in between, because that’s what the rich do.
Why is Trump being regarded as a moral arbiter? Bill Clinton wasn’t a whole lot worse than Trump, except that Trump’s bimbos were smart enough to get and enforce pre-nups and Trump wasn’t in government so he wasn’t protected like Bill.
Trump’s escapades with models while he was married were a daily feature in the press in New York during the last 15-20 years and I can’t figure out how he suddenly became the person with the right to criticize Bill Clinton for doing
exactly what he, Trump, was doing. It only shows you how the press loves Trump - and I will give him that he’s really good at publicity, having learned that even “bad” publicity is good.
...Wrong it isn’t about Bill Clinton’s “marital infidelity†its about Bill Clinton’s history of sexual abuse. He’s a rapist and sexual harasser who used his position to target use and abuse women...
Wrong. It’s not even about that. It’s about Hillarys aiding and abetting the rapes and her savage, vicious attacks on his rape/ groping victims. That’s the actual issue involving the former Worst Lady. What is a swine.
I’ll paraphrase the NY Times Editorial:
The Clintons are Democrats; therefore, everything they say or do is wonderful.
Trump is a Republican; therefore, everything he says or does is evil.
New Trump video ad re the serial rapist, Clinton and his abettor in the War on Women, Hilliarily.
Scroll down until the link to the new video ad comes up.
I've never heard that Trump committed multiple rapes. I've never heard that some of his former girlfriends ended up murdered. Are you a democrat?
.
>> “Bill Clinton wasn’t a whole lot worse than Trump...” <<
.
I wouldn’t go that far.
There is a list somewhere in FR’s files containing more than eighty names of people that committed suicide to keep Clinton out of jail.
Clintoon the "affluenza" serial rapist!
.
Some people get carried away at times.
“Why can’t we all just get along?”
- - - - Bill Clinton quoting Bill Cosby quoting Rodney King quoting Ho Chi Minh quoting Joseph Stalin quoting Adolf Hitler quoting . . . Lucifer.
No, but Trump was a well-known moral sleazebag whose escapades graced the press about every other day at various points. He was a typical rich kid who had made it to adulthood with the same attitudes he had had as a teenager, fond of harassing and browbeating lower-status women for sexual favors. But at least he usually paid them off and didn’t tell them to put ice on it, so I guess that’s something in his favor.
Defending a serial rapist?
Tell us who your candidate is so we do not support him?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.