Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putin names US among threats in new Russian security strategy
Reuters ^ | 01/02/2016 | VLADIMIR SOLDATKIN

Posted on 01/02/2016 8:26:02 AM PST by Decombobulator

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: 1rudeboy
The neoconservatives pulled the US out of the ABM Treaty, which specified that neither the US nor Russia would develop and deploy anti-ballistic missiles.

Yes, we pulled out of the treaty the Russians never honored.

Russia and Russia's president, Vladimir Putin, have been demonized by neoconservatives and their puppets in the US government and media.

Poor Pooty Poot.

The Russian government has learned that Washington does not respect Washington's own laws, much less international law, and that Washington cannot be trusted to keep any agreement.

Not like old trustworthy Russia, invading her neighbors, stealing their territory.

Thanks for the article, Paul is still good for a laugh.

41 posted on 01/02/2016 11:23:22 AM PST by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Decombobulator

IMO, the US and NATO want to keep themselves strong by weakening other countries and manufacturing excuses to weaken them economically. By saying this, I’m being a realist. This is how Russia looks at their situation and this is a reality that we should understand about our competitors on the world stage. Putin is standing up to us and letting us know that he will protect the interests of Russia on the world stage.


42 posted on 01/02/2016 11:24:09 AM PST by Ciexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ciexyz
EU-Ukraine Free Trade Deal Comes Into Effect, January 2, 2016.
www.rferl.org

This is a direct assault on Russia's sovereignty! CUUUBBAAAA!
43 posted on 01/02/2016 11:31:10 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

Link doesn't work, I believe. Let's try this: here.
44 posted on 01/02/2016 11:32:39 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
Yes, we pulled out of the treaty the Russians never honored.

Bearing also in mind that we legally pulled out of the treaty the Russians never honored.

45 posted on 01/02/2016 11:34:13 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: M Kehoe
M Kehoe (who posts with his real name).

Admirable.

46 posted on 01/02/2016 1:32:49 PM PST by Stepan12 (Our present appeasementof Islam is the Stockholm Syndrome on steroids.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

But shouldn’t Lithuania have the right to arm itself as it pleases? Lithuania is a free, sovereign state and whether it goes nuclear or not should be determined by Lithuanians.


47 posted on 01/02/2016 3:40:13 PM PST by BusterBear (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: BusterBear

I agree. Imagine if Lithuania decided to arm itself with U.S. nukes pointed at Moscow. The Russians would have something to complain about, instead of all of their caterwauling about NATO.


48 posted on 01/02/2016 3:43:18 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: duckln

Russian foreign affairs has always acted with the result being hurting America’s interests worldwide, and Russian military and intel services have always acted in harming us, undermining us, targeting us and if possible destroying us.

Russian nukes including their sub nukes are in place to utterly destroy us who they consider their enemy.


49 posted on 01/02/2016 4:03:21 PM PST by free_life (If you ask Jesus to forgive you and to save you, He will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Actually, the Associated Press had an article a couple of weeks ago that reported that Poland was considering asking for access to nuclear weapons under a NATO program. If you want the link, let me know and I’ll send it to you when I transfer over to my regular computer.


50 posted on 01/02/2016 4:12:31 PM PST by BusterBear (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Stepan12

“Admirable”

I appreciate your praise, but many others here also post with their real names.

5.56mm


51 posted on 01/02/2016 4:18:10 PM PST by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past

Well said.


52 posted on 01/02/2016 4:24:37 PM PST by petitfour (Americans need to repent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

NATO made the agreement. Then they broke it.


53 posted on 01/02/2016 4:40:47 PM PST by The Ghost of FReepers Past (Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light..... Isaiah 5:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BusterBear

Well, duh . . . let me see if I’m following you correctly. Russia reserves the right to threaten its “near abroad” with nuclear weapons, and also reserves the right to prevent them from arming themselves?


54 posted on 01/02/2016 4:53:09 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
Well, in all fairness, and as the Borscht Brigade here never tires of pointing out, the security assurances we gave Ukraine for giving up its nuclear weapons was not a "treaty."

So what's good for the goose is good for the gander.

55 posted on 01/02/2016 4:57:04 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
NATO made the agreement. Then they broke it.

Who signed the agreement? When? Do you have a copy?

56 posted on 01/02/2016 4:59:13 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

No - I was just responding to your request to a pointer that would direct you to “the information that indicates Lithuania wants to target nuclear missiles at Russia.” Not Lithuania, but possibly Poland.

Here is a link: http://www.timesofisrael.com/poland-considers-asking-for-access-to-nato-nuclear-weapons/

As for your subsequent question - “Russia reserves the right to threaten its “near abroad” with nuclear weapons, and also reserves the right to prevent them from arming themselves?” - Yes, Russia does do that. (But consider Aesop’s fable about people in glass houses.)


57 posted on 01/02/2016 6:11:47 PM PST by BusterBear (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: BusterBear

If a Republican is elected, Poland will have BMD.


58 posted on 01/02/2016 8:03:45 PM PST by rbmillerjr (Reagan conservative: All 3 Pillars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: BusterBear
Ok, so:
1. Lithuania does not want to target nuclear missiles at Russia, and
2. Lithuania has not threatened to use nuclear weapons against Russia.

Moreover, Poland is not on the border with Russia (except for Kaliningrad, which is a Russian nuclear base already). So what about Aesop's fable? Perhaps the Russians should read it.
59 posted on 01/03/2016 8:16:15 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Please refer back to comment #4.


60 posted on 01/03/2016 9:24:40 AM PST by BusterBear (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson