Posted on 12/26/2015 3:55:38 AM PST by HomerBohn
Sorry, were you trying to use a tragic world event as an excuse to say something hateful about Muslims? I thought I heard a murmur, but then it was entirely drowned out by the majesty of Republican Muslim Coalition president Saba Ahmed's American flag hijab.
(Watch video at link)
On yesterday's Kelly File, Trump campaign spokeswoman Katrina Pierson tried to argue that mosques are hotbeds of terrorist activity, and that's why her boss would consider shutting them down in the wake of the Paris attacks. So Ahmed, blessed with the patience of a million kindergarten teachers, was forced to show Pierson what's what.
"Megyn, we go to the mosque to pray," she said. "It's absolutely horrifying to hear that our constitutional rights of free exercise of religion are going to be challenged just because somebody thinks that there may be some attendees who may disagree with your views. You wouldn't shut down churches just because there were one or two Christians who were acting badly. The mosque has nothing to do with the terrorists. Yes there are people who misuse the religion for their perverted ideology but that has nothing to do with my faith."
Owned! Though really, that hijab said it all.
This snarky Muslim should have appeared in a burkha rather than wrapping herself in an American flag. This is disrespectful to the max and Fox and Kelly probably knew about it in advance.
These animals want to take over America and force all that are left to be Muslim. They desire to impose their savage laws on us. They should go back where they came from and belong. They had all that there! Just think of the children of these savages, are going to be as adults.
I missed this exchange as I don't watch Kelly File. Interesting to see Fox morph into a supporter of Muslim propaganda.
US flag burqua?
taqiyya and kitman........Meghan Kelly needs to read about how Muslims are trained in it.
********************************************
Kitman
From Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitman
In Islamic jurisprudence kitmÄn (كتمان “secrecy, concealment”) is a subfield of Ḥiyal (the practice of deception or legal trickery), consisting of the art of making ambiguous statements, paying lip-service to authority while reserving personal opposition, in a kind of political camouflage or reservatio mentalis. The use of such practices to conceal one’s religious affiliation when facing persecution or oppression is known as taqiyya.
Some early Muslim jurists such as Muadh bin Jabal were opposed to the concept altogether as they felt it implied “lying†(kidhb) and “hypocrisy†(nifaq). In the Ibadi denomination of Islam, the concept is considered an important one as the denomination’s minority status and secretive nature drove many adherents to conceal their creed in order to survive.[1]
CzesÅ‚aw MiÅ‚osz in the The Captive Mind uses the concept (spelled Ketman) as a metaphor for understanding how intellectuals behaved under the totalitarian regimes in the postwar communist Eastern Bloc. MiÅ‚osz makes parallels between kitman and the act of public hypocrisy (that is, publicly professing orthodoxy, while privately believing heterodoxy with the hope of one day being in a position of authority to spread one’s hidden ideas) in the name of individual conscience.[2] Milosz likened this mentality to a kind of acting, similar to the dissimulations of heretics in Persian Islam, who take great pleasure in pretending to be what they are not in order to avoid censure or punishment, and about whom Arthur Gobineau wrote:
“Ketman fills the man who practices it with pride. Thanks to it, a believer raises himself to a permanent state of superiority over the man he deceives, be he a minister of state or a powerful king; to him who uses Ketman, the other is a miserable blind man whom one shuts off from the true path whose existence he does not suspect [while] ... your eyes are filled with light, you walk in brightness before your enemies. It is an unintelligent being that you make sport of; it is a dangerous beast that you disarm. What a wealth of pleasures!”[3]
“The mosque has nothing to do with the terrorists.”
Foreign powers are sponsoring the mosques and they are getting the radical results that they want.
Open the books.
Is this Muslim idiot so ignorant of flag etiquette that she really does not know that it is highly disrespectful of the flag to use it as a garment?
Or does she know that, but thinks it funny that the Fox News morons think she’s being patriotic by desecrating the flag?
The hajib is a symbol of slavery, sharia and dhimmitude. To wear the flag as such is basically an open declaration of war on the USA and an announcement of what they intend to do to American women.
Undoubtedly there is a mosque somewhere here in the US where an Imam preaches love and respect for Christianity, or not.
The fact that a substantial number (25%?) of Muslims are peace loving, responsible citizens of our great nation is, sadly, irrelevant to the murderous convictions of a small number (25%?) of Muslims who pray at the mosque for our destruction and their domination.
Better she rail against those who foul her faith with their murdering than pretend there is no problem with Islam.
“Yes there are people who misuse the religion for their perverted ideology but that has nothing to do with my faith,”
Taqiyya. I trust none of them. She soils our great flag.
What was Tripoli, again? Marine’s Hymn: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SwS6OkgUXKE
If it preaches Sharia for the US it does.
61% of muslims in America are first generation immigrants. There is a large base of support for Sharia as law of the land in that crowd.
You can’t hear the truth over the sound of your own ignorance.
Jessica Roy stalled this propaganda from the faux Republican Muslim hook, line and sinker. The only person pawned here is Jessica.
Muslims are encouraged to lie to us Kaffirs (infidels) to advance their faith.
The second generation is worse wrt spreading Islam by the sword.
Some Tonya Harding lookalike needs to come along & rip that flag hijab off Saba Ahmed’s ugly Muslimah face.
Islam has never been a religion of peace.
Islam has been at war with everyone else since 622 A.D.
It must remain so until there is only Islam.
Or no Islam.
Mad Mo made it so.
The future must not belong to those who deny the true nature of Islam
John Quincy Adams on Islam
In the seventh century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab of the lineage of Hagar, the Egyptian, combining the powers of transcendent genius, with the preternatural energy of a fanatic, and the fraudulent spirit of an impostor, proclaimed himself as a messenger from Heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth. Adopting from the sublime conception of the Mosaic law, the doctrine of one omnipotent God; he connected indissolubly with it, the audacious falsehood, that he was himself his prophet and apostle. Adopting from the new Revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life, and of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust, by adapting all the rewards and sanctions of his religion to the gratification of the sexual passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. THE ESSENCE OF HIS DOCTRINE WAS VIOLENCE AND LUST: TO EXALT THE BRUTAL OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE.
Between these two religions, thus contrasted in their characters, a war of twelve hundred years has already raged. That war is yet flagrant; nor can it cease but by the extinction of that imposture, which has been permitted by Providence to prolong the degeneracy of man. While the merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false prophet shall furnish motives to human action, there can never be peace upon earth, and good will towards men. The hand of Ishmael will be against every man, and every man’s hand against him. It is, indeed, amongst the mysterious dealings of God, that this delusion should have been suffered for so many ages, and during so many generations of human kind, to prevail over the doctrines of the meek and peaceful and benevolent Jesus (Blunt, 1830, 29:269, capitals in orig.).
Yup
He stole that look.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.