Great stuff!
“The science is settled...”
There is no such damn thing.
New Mexico should just replace Senator Udall with a recording of democrat clichés.
Ask a liberal how much does global warming cost, they call you a racist. Ask a liberal what the risk mitigation strategy is in the event we overshoot and the world starts cooling and they will call you a racist. Ask a liberal, given they have all the money in the world to “fix” global warming how they would actually fix it, and they call you a racist.
The only real answer if a liberal engages you in this debate is to call them a moron. Don’t sugar coat it. That was Alinsky’s biggest fear. We should be using it against them.
“We need to stop debating whether climate change is real. The science is settled, and Senator Cruz is out of touch,†said Sen. Tom Udall
...
There is no such thing as settled science, especially climate science where there is no climate model that’s ever been successfully backtested.
“Settled science” is a concept that only exists in the corrupt and criminal world of politics.
If there was a computer model that said puppies become little boys, would that be settled science?
There is no consensus in real science.
algore said 10 years ago we would all be burned to a crisp come Jan. 2016. Rush set up a countdown clock—it’s ticking and we are all still here.
Anyway, why should the burden of 7 billion souls on the planet be the responsibility of 300 million U.S. citizens (and 30 million illegals)?
He cited predictions of climate catastrophe that have failed to come true, starting with Secretary of State John Kerry’s 2009 op-ed stating that, “Scientists project that the Arctic will be ice-free in the summer of 2013.â€
...
There was a time when the Flat Earth Model was settled science.
Now NASA refuses to submit to Congressional oversight.
What debates are you talking about? I can not recall a real debate on this.
If you want to observe Mark Steyn’s brief but brilliant testimony, you can watch at the approx. 47:30 minute mark.
It's all coming around again and environmentalists who don't get their way and going to apply the force of government to be sure they get their way. They are smelling victory and can't wait for a world where their will rules the planet.
Michael Mann
In August 1984 he went to the University of California, Berkeley, to major in physics with a second major in applied math.
Another study by Mann and Park raised a minor technical issue with a climate model about human influence on climate change: this was published in 1996. In the context of controversy over the IPCC Second Assessment Report the paper was praised by those opposed to action on climate change, and the conservative organisation Accuracy in Media claimed that it had not been publicised due to media bias.
From 1996–1998, after defending his PhD thesis at Yale, Mann carried out paleoclimatology research at the University of Massachusetts Amherst funded by a United States Department of Energy postdoctoral fellowship.
In July 2013 Mann joined in the Terry McAuliffe gubernatorial campaign, 2013, promoting the role of scientific research and technology in job creation.
“The rate of global temperature rise mayhave hit a plateau, but a climate crisis still looms in the near future.” By Michael E. Mann ...
Mr. Cruz said the Senate Democrats’ “prebuttal†to the hearing came as a “backhanded compliment,†adding that the Democrats “doth protest too much.â€
...
“If you’re a real Nobel Laureate like Ivar Giaever, who won the 1973 Nobel Prize in Physics, or if you’re older, tenured and sufficiently eminent, you can just about withstand the Big Climate enforcers jumping you in the parking lot and taking the hockey stick to you,†Mr. Steyn said. “But, if you’re a younger scientist, you know that, if you cross Mann and the other climate mullahs, there goes tenure, there goes funding, there goes your career.â€
______________________________________________________
That is just beautiful.
“The science is settled....”
That’s how we know you are liars. Science is NEVER settled!
Good to see Cruz on the job while he campaigns.
Replace Christmas Trees with the word mooslimes and Trumps ban would be a shoe in.
Just an observation.
....ahem...yeah...
You don’t get flack unless you’re over the target. Cruz CLEARLY is over the target and dropping bombs like there’s no tomorrow.
These climate-change fraudsters have outright falsified raw data stretching over several decades in order to mislead people into supporting their attempt to control even more of the world’s economy than they already do. That, plus the FACT that we are likely facing a Mauder Mimimum-like climate starting around 2030, tells me that the best public policy would be to at least ignore these people, and preferably to jail them at a facility somewhere north of the Arctic Circle.