The White House apparently gets to decide who qualifies for President.
If this isn’t a dictatorship worthy of the wall then I don’t know what is.
Trump should respond with one word- Benghazi.
He wins with that response.
Trump is just an anti-subculturalist while Obamorroid is the anarchist with anarchy being the subculture.
That speech Obama made in Paris should disqualify him for the presidency. He stood in the city that was attacked by terror on Nov.13th, and said, “mass shooting only happen in America”. Really? In his haste to put America down while on european soil, Obama made sweeping generalizations that made him look like a fool.
Unfortunately we don’t live in a Muslim country and Obama isn’t an Imam that can just bark orders and everyone must obey or die.
If being a moslem stoner from Indonesia and taking it up the butt for the other fag grad students on campus... if THAT doesn’t disqualify someone from being president, then no ‘muslim proposal’ will do it.
How much do we taxpayers pay these “Baghdad Bobs” to be White House spokespersons?
Yeah - Obama is an expert on being disqualified.
Article II section 1
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
Donald Trump is eminently qualified. Josh Earnest and all who share his view are demonstrably ignorant.
THOUSANDS of innocent American citizens have been slaughtered by Islamic terrorists in the United States over the last couple decades(including 911, the Boston bombings and the San Bernardino shootings) because we bent over backwards to allow them to come over here to have access to our freedoms and opportunities without vetting them properly.. and people have a problem with a temporary halt on Muslim immigration until we can get a better system to make sure we don’t bring more jihadists in with them?.. The enemy has promised much more to come in the near future.. What would FDR do?
American born ‘citizen’ Farook was 14 on 9/11. That means he spent his formative years here post 9/11, a time that saw great patriotic fervor for the US from all Americans. What does it say about him and his family that he could become so radicalized and travel overseas to obtain a radical bride? How many more Farooks do we have in our midst?
Good Morning Mr. Mod?
I would suggest moving this to News/Activism or even breaking news, this is a continuing major story.
Thanks!
With this announcement by Josh Earnest, Obama reveals he is frightened at the prospect of a Trump presidency. Perhaps petrified.
This is no small development, but they’re making a big mistake in not realizing where the American people actually stand on this.
They are attempting to paint Trump as nutty, but what could be more nutty than Kerry, Obama, and Hillary (not to mention most Republicans) declaring that this is “not about Islam”? The people are beginning to see right through this.
It is sinking in now, with an assist from Trump, that the problem never has been “radical” Islam, the problem is Islam. Trump’s proposal is the first to break through this definitional logjam, and the people sense it to be correct. The problem for the elites is that we have come to the realization that we cannot read minds. We cannot know which muslim is radical and which is not. There is no solution whereby consequences don’t accrue to all muslims, radical or no, because we have not the ability to distinguish.
The San Bernardino massacre has made this an existential issue, and the people feel un-protected.
If we think about it, there is a humane element to what Trump proposes, because this is headed for a situation in which, feeling unprotected, the people will begin to take matters into their own hands. Another massacre and we may see a backlash that leaves no muslim safe on our soil. That’s where this is headed.
Only if consequences begin to accrue to all muslims, will we have created a climate in which they will be compelled to police themselves.
Trump’s policy is the beginning of a sane, humane policy, where Islam is deemed to be the problem, not just “radical” Islam. This is where we must go if we’re going to keep our country.
What does the Supreme Court say about this, Mr. Hussein?
LMFAO
Off hand, I’d say that normal Americans who have lived 9/11 and its aftermath, looked at newspaper reports of Paris, Syria, Libya and the world over are a little more concerned about Muslim terrorism than Mr. Earnest whose job it is to get up and lie to the press every day.
They’re concerned about their children and grandchildren going to school and not getting blown up by a pipe bomb left by a rabid Muslim-American and his Jihadini wife. They’re concerned about themselves getting blown up on a train, plane or car (in a tunnel or on a bridge). They’re concerned about some freaked out Muslim walking into their office with carnage on his mind. They’re concerned whether going to a Christian Church might cause them to meet their maker sooner than they’d intended. They’re concerned now that there IS the slightest of chances they won’t make it home at night.
I’d say that trumps Mr. Earnest’s bleats by a landslide. Next November, America will show Mr. Earnest exactly who IS qualified to be President - and he will be out of a job.
i know this is stating the obvious, but once we realize that BO, the NYTimes, and the alphabet networks are siding with the Muslim psychopaths, it all becomes very clear.
Barak, you mixed up kid, if Trump’s political stance could disqualify him from the presidency, then why didn’t your association with communists and terrorists? It doesn’t work that way, and you know it.
The WH has never read the constitution. That’s why they govern like they do.