Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump’s Proposed Muslim Immigration Moratorium Is the Wrong Response to Political Correctness
National Review ^ | December 7, 2015 | David French

Posted on 12/08/2015 1:39:56 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

I completely get the fury over political correctness. I completely understand that the aristocratic political, media, and academic establishment have been lying to us about Islam and the Muslim world for more than fourteen years. As I explain at length on the home page, it's simply not the case that Islam is a peaceful, tolerant faith plagued by a tiny few extremists. Rather, Islam has massive problem with hate and bigotry - with hundreds of millions of Muslims supporting the worst kinds of religious intolerance and tens of millions more outright terrorist sympathizers. In the refugee controversy, I've repeated over and over that it's foolish to admit a class of refugees when we know the world's leading terror army is attempting to infiltrate the displaced masses or recruit from their ranks. We can be compassionate without making ourselves vulnerable.

But the correct response to political correctness isn't to simply take the opposite position, to answer one form of unthinking ideology with another. By tacking to the opposite of Obama's scolding self-righteousness, Trump isn't charting his own course so much as merely reacting. In fact, now that he's "clarified" that he's not just talking about immigration but a moratorium on all Muslim entry to the United States, he's gone well beyond being the anti-Obama and has reacted straight into foolishness.

Off the top of their heads, even the most hawkish national security conservatives can identify multiple categories of Muslims who should have access to the United States, beginning - of course - with our own citizens. There are many others. What about the interpreters who've laid down their lives to serve our warriors downrange and now find themselves under imminent threat from jihadists? What about members of allied militaries who are training to be the Muslim "boots on the ground" that we need to help take the fight to the enemy? Do we treat the Kurds - who are sheltering so many of Iraq's Christians while also providing the most effective fighting force against ISIS - the same as we treat suspected terrorists? It makes no sense.

On the merits of Trump's proposal, I agree with Ben Shapiro:

Kiss Our Intelligence Apparatus Goodnight. We need to work with Muslims both foreign and domestic. It's one thing to label Islamic terrorism and radical Islam a problem. It's another to label all individual Muslims a problem. That's what this policy does. It's factually wrong and ethically incomprehensible. Donald Trump has just transformed into the strawman President Obama abused on Sunday night.

There is nothing wrong with closing our borders to select groups when confronted with actionable intelligence or to place some groups under greater scrutiny because of known threats. But to treat every single Muslim as a threat, regardless of whether they're from Raqqa, Erbil, Cairo, or Des Moines - and regardless of whether they've tweeted jihadist threats or bled on the battlefield alongside our troops - is to act mindlessly. I would also say Trump is acting maliciously, but I don't think Trump despises Muslims as much as he loves leading the news cycle. This is a political stunt and should be treated as such.

I often speak to audiences on college campuses and elsewhere about the proper response to PC nonsense. I call the formula "apathetic, informed conviction." When formulating cultural or political opinions, one must be completely apathetic to PC pressures - don't react against or capitulate to leftist browbeating. Instead, educate yourself and act through informed conviction. Respond to unreason with reason, to intimidation with a bored shrug, and speak truth even when the truth is unpleasant. In this instance, however, Donald Trump is the voice of attention-seeking reaction, not principled leadership.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: drumptydumpty; gopprimary; islamicterrorism; muslims; nationalsecurity; newscycle; pc; politicalcorrectness; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last
To: Jim Robinson

Jim. I am very disappointed.

I truly enjoy FR... but we have a true conservative and a constitutional originalist to rally behind, one that I haven’t even mentioned by name here, yet the knives come out... supporting some reality TV star clown?

I guess it has to get a LOT WORSE before it gets better.

That’s frightening.

I guess we will see what happens.


41 posted on 12/08/2015 2:58:20 AM PST by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

Islam has set itself out to conquer the world and must either be defeated or submitted to. Time for all to choose which side they are on.


42 posted on 12/08/2015 2:58:26 AM PST by ez (Abashed the devil stood and felt how awful goodness is... - Milton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
But to treat every single Muslim as a threat, regardless of whether they're from Raqqa, Erbil, Cairo, or Des Moines - and regardless of whether they've tweeted jihadist threats or bled on the battlefield alongside our troops - is to act mindlessly.

This statement is a short-sighted interpretation of what Trump said.

There is nothing wrong with closing our borders to select groups when confronted with actionable intelligence or to place some groups under greater scrutiny because of known threats.

43 posted on 12/08/2015 3:04:03 AM PST by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erod
Something for the ping list to consider if they are wondering which cause/campaign to donate money to. Jim and John or Ted?

It's our choice.

44 posted on 12/08/2015 3:07:01 AM PST by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
We do not have the ability to sort the good Muslims from the bad.

The "good ones" are not really good. They are the decoys that give aid, supply, and concealment for the mohamicidals that walk freely amongst them.

They also have standing declarations of war against us! Why are they still here?

45 posted on 12/08/2015 3:13:44 AM PST by rawcatslyentist (Genesis 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

It would be easier to counter an extreme like Islamic immigration with an extreme like a total ban, and then open up for exceptions who don’t pose a security risk. Imagine if during WW2 we had an open door policy allowing Nazis to immigrate here, (something that in reality would have been less harmful than our present situation). We may claim we are not at war with Islam, but Islam is always at jihad with non believers, even if that means they are waiting until their numbers are sufficient to act. A zero tolerance of Islam is a good starting point for making exceptions.


46 posted on 12/08/2015 3:17:23 AM PST by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

Reagan was a democrat ......I think that turned out well...

champion of capitalism

Self funded

owes no favors

pro 2a

works for me

oh well


47 posted on 12/08/2015 3:18:28 AM PST by Therapsid ( would rather have HER beside mw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

Poor Amy....grow a pair!


48 posted on 12/08/2015 3:20:58 AM PST by RightGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pallis

We did interment camps for Japanese Americans during WWII.

I don’t think Trump asking for a PAUSE is radical. I think its a mild proposal compared to Interment camps


49 posted on 12/08/2015 3:22:46 AM PST by Zenjitsuman (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

Or maybe require them to denounce the sedition of sharia in order to gain admittance - maybe requiring evidence that they support the opposite of sharia so their words aren’t just taqiyya. Sharia is not religion, it is the official stance of executing and/or enslaving non-Muslims. To support sharia is to be an enemy of the US Constitution. The Muslims who need to be weeded out are the ones who support sharia. And it wouldn’t be a religious test in violation of the First Amendment. It would be weeding out those who intend to kill or enable the killing of non-Muslims simply because they are non-Muslim. It would be truly VETTING them before entrance. Require them to show evidence of their opposition to sharia.


50 posted on 12/08/2015 3:23:37 AM PST by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

Hey, BentRod, nice grammar and spelling.

YOU’RE the ignoramus, fool!


51 posted on 12/08/2015 3:23:47 AM PST by RightGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

just the opposite ... Trump is brilliant !


52 posted on 12/08/2015 3:29:53 AM PST by Patton@Bastogne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Ok, so stop ALL immigration and visas.


53 posted on 12/08/2015 3:31:37 AM PST by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

Islam and sharia law is not compatible with our Constitution or our form of government. So why would they want to come to the United States except to “fundamentally transform the United States of America” as our muslim president is trying to do! Get them out of here now before it’s too late!

Trump/Cruz


54 posted on 12/08/2015 3:35:29 AM PST by ImNotLying
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RightGuy
It was intentional. Sorry you missed my subtlety.

You win a tee shirt though!


55 posted on 12/08/2015 3:37:26 AM PST by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
But the correct response to political correctness isn't to simply take the opposite position, to answer one form of unthinking ideology with another.

It's not a response of unthinking ideology. It's a thoughtful response to an existential threat.

56 posted on 12/08/2015 3:40:09 AM PST by Sirius Lee (Cruz or Lose 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

“Someone needs to take the reins of this country or we’re all going to get killed............”

This is the reason we need a leader who speaks “straight from the shoulder” and tells it like it is. I am, like many of you, complete disgusted with the politically correct crowd who pussy foot around a subject by using PC words instead of hitting right between the eyes with what you have to say. Tell it like it is and stop all the PC BS.


57 posted on 12/08/2015 3:47:08 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala
.


My single question to those railing against Donald Trump ...


How many more thousands of innocent Americans ...

HAVE TO BE SLAUGHTERED by Islam ...

before we say "enough" ?


.

58 posted on 12/08/2015 3:56:54 AM PST by Patton@Bastogne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Why is following the refugee law wrong? It requires us to ask about religion. Trump didn’t write the law.


59 posted on 12/08/2015 3:57:23 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Most Conservatives believe the radical muslims make up 50% of muslim population around the world. Yes, its as high as 50%, which make it 500 million radical muslims. It only make sense that we ban them from entering


60 posted on 12/08/2015 4:00:52 AM PST by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson