Here are some links: http://www.discerningthetimesonline.net/#!islam-shariah-law-/c15qj
In looking further, this seems to come from a book by Dr. Peter Hammond, “Slavery, Terrorism & Islam: The
Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat”. I guess I would need to read the book to see the citations he offers.
Another item of interest is an article at http://www.danielpipes.org/comments/65537 . It links to a chronology of Islamic terrorism as well as a listing of Mohammad’s own words regarding terrorism.
One of the points made in that piece is that more Muslims become terrorists when they have the opportunity - IOW, when they are intermixed with non-Muslims. The author’s comment is that it is crazy to send non-Muslims into a Muslim country for war, but the inverse is also true: it is crazy to improt Muslims into America to do war here.
One of the problems with this article, though, is that it only addresses terrorism. Terrorism is the means through which Islam seeks to scare host cultures into accepting Muslim terms. Today the more effective tool is multiculturalism, and the major way of subduing nations is by demographics, as Hammond’s work shows more clearly. We can look at what has happened in Europe to create pockets of sharia for “cultural” reasons, and then see that those pockets work into the legal fabric to extend to ever-larger areas.
The latter reference in this post distinguishes between Muslim “fundamentalists” and non-fundamentalists, as if only fundamentalists are terrorists. That may or may not be true, but the part of Islam that opposes civilization in general and the US Constitution in particular is sharia which outlaws everything except Islam, and when Prince Charles gathered “moderate” Muslims to get them to denounce terrorism, not one of them would denounce sharia.
Minnesota has a standing US Representative who pledges allegiance to sharia over the US Constituiton - Keith Ellison. That is, he WANTS sharia to trump the US Constituiton, though he at this point may acknowledge that it doesn’t for the US yet. The fact that Barack Obama has a “sharia czar” should tell us everything we need to know about the ultimate goal of this Islamist-installed foreign enemy combatant in our White House.
I have zero problem with what Trump said, in fact I think we should round up the gays while we are at it
Trump’s interview this morning, where he talked about “no-go zones” in France and Britain, gets into that issue of problems caused by large groups of Muslims in one place, even if terrorism is not considered. This is a step in the right direction, because terrorism is more of a side-show to the Islamic plan for a worldwide caliphate. It gets our attention and creates urgency but the terror we need to combat is even more insidious. If we don’t take the Islamist threat seriously right now, it will be SYSTEMATIC killing of non-Muslims, not the “asymmetric warfare” that we call “terrorism”. It won’t be mass shootings; it will be neighborhoods lining up whatever Christians they can catch and chopping their heads off like is being done in many places of the world already. These “no-go zones” are just the beginning.
Trump is absolutely right to bring this issue to the front. Asymmetric warfare is among the LEAST of the problems with importing Muslims, yet it is the only problem that even my preferred candidate (Cruz) has been willing to address publicly to this point. Trump is moving the discussion past the true “politically correct” boundary and getting really real, really quick. A critical need for America right now, BEFORE the Islamic demographics are irreversible.