Trump’s interview this morning, where he talked about “no-go zones” in France and Britain, gets into that issue of problems caused by large groups of Muslims in one place, even if terrorism is not considered. This is a step in the right direction, because terrorism is more of a side-show to the Islamic plan for a worldwide caliphate. It gets our attention and creates urgency but the terror we need to combat is even more insidious. If we don’t take the Islamist threat seriously right now, it will be SYSTEMATIC killing of non-Muslims, not the “asymmetric warfare” that we call “terrorism”. It won’t be mass shootings; it will be neighborhoods lining up whatever Christians they can catch and chopping their heads off like is being done in many places of the world already. These “no-go zones” are just the beginning.
Trump is absolutely right to bring this issue to the front. Asymmetric warfare is among the LEAST of the problems with importing Muslims, yet it is the only problem that even my preferred candidate (Cruz) has been willing to address publicly to this point. Trump is moving the discussion past the true “politically correct” boundary and getting really real, really quick. A critical need for America right now, BEFORE the Islamic demographics are irreversible.
You deal with “no go zones” by GOING THERE. If it’s “no go” because police & others get harassed or worse just for being there, you enforce existing laws with gusto. Legitimate authorities are supposed to legitimately exercise their authority, even if it puts them in harm’s way - ESPECIALLY if it puts them in harm’s way. These “no go zones” are forming because they’re getting away with it. If the offenses seem orchestrated by non-citizens, then you get the National Guard et al in there if need be (I understand “Posse Comitatus Act”, which is not meant to stop our military from addressing invaders appropriately).