1 posted on
11/28/2015 2:38:17 PM PST by
BenLurkin
To: BenLurkin
Regulated to the dark ages ....
2 posted on
11/28/2015 2:41:51 PM PST by
Squantos
( Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everyone you meet ...)
To: BenLurkin
No source of US energy is acceptable to Obola.
3 posted on
11/28/2015 2:42:09 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. --George Orwell)
To: BenLurkin
Its OK, we can build massive solar farms that fry the birds and wind mills to finish them off to offset shutting san onofre and diablo canyon down.
4 posted on
11/28/2015 2:46:26 PM PST by
NormsRevenge
(SEMPER FI!! - Monthly Donors Rock!!)
To: BenLurkin
But vast fields of solar panels, wind turbines that in places are as common as fence posts and developments in power storage speak to changed times.They can speak all they want, they aren't going to satisfy the state's power requirements.
5 posted on
11/28/2015 2:48:14 PM PST by
Jeff Chandler
(Evil, in this world, comes from sin. Not from income disparity or 'climate change.' - Dr.Cernea)
To: BenLurkin
I never understand the liberals objections to nuclear power.
Nuclear power plants produce none of the greenhouse gases which liberals bitch about. And newer nuclear plants produce less nuclear waste than the older nuclear plants still in operation. This is an issue because we have not been allowed to build new nuclear plants in recent years which use the latest technology.
Meanwhile the population keeps growing, demand for power for all the latest gadgets keeps growing, the electric grid keeps aging, but liberals block many of the actions we could take to keep up with demand for electricity.
To: BenLurkin
PG&E should sell Diablo Canyon to the Chinese.
7 posted on
11/28/2015 3:24:13 PM PST by
Brad from Tennessee
(A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
To: BenLurkin
Why not put them on Indian Reservations..?
Permitting for citing a nuke takes at least 20 years on “real” US territory.
Nuclear tech has advanced big time.
I think Tonto could clean-up big-time if he went this way and turn it into a win/win for ALL.
8 posted on
11/28/2015 3:46:48 PM PST by
gaijin
To: BenLurkin
California must be limited to ONLY wind and solar. Anything else is evyil.
To: BenLurkin
Edison shut down San Onofre?
10 posted on
11/28/2015 4:17:25 PM PST by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: BenLurkin
It’s California. Let them freeze in the dark.
L
12 posted on
11/28/2015 4:54:25 PM PST by
Lurker
(Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
To: BenLurkin
13 posted on
11/28/2015 4:59:36 PM PST by
Extremely Extreme Extremist
(I am going to get those guns out of peoples hands. - Hillary Clinton 10/05/2015)
To: BenLurkin
California doesn’t need gas, oil, water or nuke power.
It’s utopia
21 posted on
11/29/2015 5:35:34 AM PST by
hattend
(Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
To: BenLurkin
,a href="http://www.wildergarten.com/wp_pages/articles/nrdc_energy_racketeering.html">Energy Racketeering: The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)
The origins and history of regulatory power as the resurgence of European mercantilism via tax-exempt foundations and environmental law. How the current system works using the example of NRDC machinations in the California energy market.
22 posted on
11/29/2015 6:44:54 AM PST by
Carry_Okie
(Dupes for Donald, Chumps for Trump)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson