Posted on 11/26/2015 8:08:37 AM PST by Kaslin
The Thanksgiving season is upon us, and as most Americans look forward to spending this special time of year with family and friends, many other Americans, including 2.7 million children, are forced to spend the holidays without their mother and/or father, through no fault of their own.
In all too many homes, there will be an empty seat at the Thanksgiving table.
The U.S. criminal justice system incarcerates more citizens than any other country in the world including, incredibly, those with authoritarian (or worse) governments. That makes it impossible to ignore the high cost we pay as a society for a cycle of shattered communities, broken families and Americans that are lost to a life of crime.
While these people are behind bars often for a reason, we must ask ourselves: Is this really how we want our children to be raised by relatives or foster parents? Is this cycle something that we want to continue, or is there a way to break that disturbing cycle, at least for the children of some of the incarcerated?
There's hope on the horizon for many of these families. There's a gathering consensus giving rise to a national movement toward a more effective criminal justice system one that promises to improve public safety, to save taxpayer dollars and to strengthen families through data-driven reforms at the state and federal level.
Those reforms have already demonstrated their effectiveness in states such as Texas and Georgia. It's all the more striking in that these are both deeply "red" states that no one would suggest are in any way "soft on crime."
U.S. taxpayers spend $80 billion per year on the state and federal jail and prison systems, and billions more in collateral consequences to our families and communities. The time to reverse course on this destructive path is now.
We can protect the public while also reducing prison sentences for low-level, nonviolent offenders, who make up a majority of our prison population. Our system should instead focus costly public-safety resources on those criminals who truly pose a serious public threat. A good first step would be enactment into law of the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act of 2015, which was introduced in the U.S. Senate on Oct. 1and which enjoys surprisingly broad, bipartisan support. This and a number of other pieces of legislation currently being considered by Congress offer reforms that would greatly improve the plight many Americans face.
Alternatives to incarceration, such as restitution, as well as recidivism-reduction programs, have effectively decreased prison populations in many states, and through programs operated by faith-based and community organizations, many inmates have changed their lives, and now contribute to society and care for their families instead of becoming career criminals.
The best-known example of faith-based communities working to reduce recidivism and to turn lives around is Prison Fellowship, a Christian outreach group founded in 1976 by onetime Nixon administration Special Counsel Chuck Colson after he served seven months in federal prison himself on Watergate-related charges.
The Leesburg, Va.-based Prison Fellowship's operating premise is simple, but heartfelt: "Remember those in prison," it says on its website's homepage. "Even the most broken lives and situations can be restored and made whole when we respond to God's call to serve men and women behind bars." Prison Fellowship's mission includes material, emotional and spiritual support for the families and loved ones of the incarcerated.
At this time of year especially, it's important to remember the inherent dignity of each human life, including those having served time in our nation's jails and prisons, and those closest to them.
The time has come for Americans on both sides of the political divide to join hands to support meaningful criminal justice reform that breaks this cycle of incarceration and instead provides a cycle of redemption and second chances.
If not for the incarcerated, let's do it for our children this Thanksgiving season.
You cannot legalize without subsidizing.
Drug addicts are unemployable and spend all their money on their habits.
Legalizers assume that there are zero consequences to society telling addicts that their life decisions are valid and should be guaranteed by law.
Legalization means more unemployable addicts who will survive by either directly robbing and assaulting productive human beings, or by giving votes to politicians who will indirectly rob productive human beings through taxes and through insane employment laws.
And all addicts are inherently violent - for every "nonviolent" drug addict there is usually at least one friend or family member who has been menaced or assaulted, and who is too embarrassed to file charges.
Anyone who tries to stand between an addict and his fix will soon learn how "nonviolent" he is.
If you don't know the difference of author and source you better go back to school. You sure need it
You are 100 percent correct.
A stern warning, in the firmest possible language, preferably in writing.
I admire anyone who adopts children and gives them a loving home.
Thank you, they certainly were loved!
I don't doubt it one bit that they were loved.
Cuba, anyone?
I mentored two young men (now men and doing well) a number of years back. The younger one told me once “my life is better when mom is in jail”. It was the sad truth.
Good for you,you are awesome!
drunk drivers and drug addicts? It’s not a victimless crime. Where do you think these addicts get their money from? Why do you think organizations like MADD exist? What about the families that are without because these lowlifes spend the money? Do you really think these are good role models for children? I am the mother of an addict and the grandmother of a child who has an addict for a parent, believe me, it’s not a victimless crime!!
Happy Thanksgiving to You and Yours, Kaslin!
The article is a load of liberal, legalize crime claptrap. The most certain way to avoid incarceration is not breaking the law. As things stand now, incarceration is no deterrent for crime- they are cared for better than many of our elderly or veterans who actually did something for our society instead of tearing it down.
Amen!
Ah, dang it, if you were just a little sooner, but I just gave my money to the starving animal fund with all the sad pictures on TV.
I’m glad for that and I sincerely salute you.
In answer to your question, I would very much like to do exactly that. Still working it.
No argument with your basic point. The question is how do you minimize the cost?
There is a hard core of addicts who will not get help, who will never shake the monkey on their back. The less we spend on them, the better. Jails are very expensive places, a precious resource if you will. Junkies don’t merit jail unless and until their violent conduct forces the issue.
With our current crowd of sue-happy anti-religious malcontents, and widespread skepticism, sometimes help that is worth a dime isn’t even allowed to get near the people who need it.
Let’s ban everything that someone might do something stupid with and get a boo-boo on, then. We are not safe until our rubber rooms are complete.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.