[amorphous]

'Would provide no meaningful additional security for the American people' - Obama

[SatinDoll]

To Obama - Bull ****!!

[hadaclueonce]

then Veto you socialist Bass droppings

[Pearls Before Swine]

“I can do whatever I want.”

Legally, it takes 67 votes in the Senate to tell Obama to do or not do something.

But, he can go ahead anyway... what’re they going to do, impeach him? Or, will his handpicked cabinet of radical declare him incompetent, so Joe Half-Brain can right the Ship of State?

We are in a world of hurt.

[conservativejoy]

Are there any Democrats willing to protect the American people?

[samtheman]

DO. NOT. FEAR. VETO.

(message to spineless RINO-amoeba in Congress)

[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

If police officers can be charged with murder for not placing a suspect in a seat belt and then he later died, can the President be charged with murder if Americans die at the hands of his refugees? It would be negligence on his part. Can we charge him with depraved heart murder?

[COBOL2Java]

"Uh oh! He's going to veto the bill?? No sense in bothering to pass it then!"

[rockinqsranch]

That was to be expected.

It’s America versus Obama.

[combat_boots]

III%

Three percent

[Bratch]

We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.

Barack Obama

These aren't refugees.

They're recruits.

[freeangel]

Let him veto! The blood of US citizens will be ALL on him and the democrats that insist on sticking with this treasonous pos.

[relictele]

This legislation would introduce unnecessary and impractical requirements that would unacceptably hamper our efforts to assist some of the most vulnerable people in the world, many of whom are victims of terrorism

Unnecessary and impractical...like Obamacare?

It's not up to OMB to accept, merely to execute under the law.

The victims have their own sovereign governments. If they are dissatisfied with those governments, I'm sorry for them but hollowing out the peaceful population of a nation in the hope that peace will someday result is nonsensical.

[lapsus calami]

 

 

That a-hole has dismissed the safety of the nation in the face of overwhelming evidence and publicly thrown his lot in with the jihadis.

 

 

[Vic S]

the House bill "is untenable and would provide no meaningful additional security for the American people, instead serving only to create significant delays and obstacles" for people fleeing the conflict in Syria."

But they aren't fleeing the confict in Syria. Most are refugees living in camps in Turkey and Jordan. And, since Obama has recently stated, "ISIS is contained." Then why can't they go back to their home, Syria?"

[gaijin]

“Competing in the market of ideas for elections is TROUBLESOME —better to replace the electorate with desperate new people voting with their stomachs and accustomed to corruption...”

[Chgogal]

Make my day! Veto that bill Mr. President.

[GreenHornet]

Republicans see the Syrians as potential terrorists.

Democrats see the Syrians as potential voters.

[Timber Rattler]

Make the petulant boy king do it!

[Toespi]

Then let him veto it, put it in the record and when Americans die by the hands of Syrian refugees, let him answer to it. There won’t be a video to blame it on this time.

[austinaero]

“In its veto threat, the White House said the House bill “is untenable and would provide no meaningful additional security for the American people, instead serving only to create significant delays and obstacles” for people fleeing the conflict in Syria.”

Seems like a contradictory statement to me. Delays and obstacles are meaningful security elements. Isn’t that idea behind concrete barricades at gate entrances?