Posted on 11/17/2015 1:52:40 PM PST by Mariner
Good thinking. However we have spent so many resources there twice already. Good soilders lost already in these ME wars. That doesnt include all the wounded soilders. Whatever we do. We do it All the way. No ROE.
Just thought his proposal was better by a mile than bringing those Muslims here.
Two months ago.. I had NO real objection.
After the Paris attacks and the discovery that one of the refugees was a TERRORIST pretending to be a refugee a WHOLE LOT changed.
We now have 30 States REFUSING to take these REFUGEES.
Why not err on the side of caution as opposed to getting one American killed ny ISIS?... or are you PRO ISIS?
Well, bye, Jindal.
The other low flyers need to do the same.
Go Trump, go!!
See tag line:D
Well, yeah, I guess you've busted me.
Criticize Trump = pro-ISIS.
Take a look, folks...we now have an all-new height of insanity.
BTW, two months ago we knew that those Syrians were almost all young males, that they were causing trouble in the countries they descended upon, that there was no way to vet them, and that Muslims clerics were saying they were an invasion force.
If you had "no real objection" to any of that, you're brain dead.
TTTT!
I didn't mention Trump.. YOU DID.
I'm talking "PRO AMERICAN".. erring on the side of caution.
You, unfortunately, are inflicted with TDS and cannot see the forest for the trees.
There’s a differencce between giving a bunch of 8th century savages a country and hoping that they’ll do something grand with it, aka “nation building” and establishing colonies.
Make the safe zone aka colony in the Golan heights next to Israel. One flank covered. Privatize the building of the colony along the lines of the East India Company. That takes care of the funding. Some financing derived from Gitmo II, the supermax of the levant.
The idea has potential.
I didn't mention Trump.. YOU DID.
I'm talking "PRO AMERICAN".. erring on the side of caution.
You, unfortunately, are inflicted with TDS and cannot see the forest for the trees.
Anything is better than bringing them here. China might know what to do with them.
“It also appears to be contrary to his insistence there should be no “no fly zone”.
Isis doesn’t have planes. Doesn’t need a no fly zone.
He believes that the Muslim refugees are a national security risk and should be re-settled in Middle Eastern countries. Two months ago, he was urging Congress and Homeland Security not to take them in.
He'll be introducing legislation to bar them from the country.
LOL! Okay, I admit that was FUnnie but...I still gotta go with Trump.
Trump/Cruz 2016!!!
p.s. And he was RIGHT about bombing the ISIS oil wells.
The traitor-in-chief already wants these potential terrorists to come to our country, and we’re stuck with this treasonous bastard for another 14 months. How do we stop him from importing these people here?
Europe is already letting these people in. Dangerous beyond belief.
If a safe zone can be built in Syria, that’s a great idea. But we haven’t built one in Iraq or Afghanistan yet, so what makes us think can build one in Syria?
I wish we could reinstate immigration quotas. Fat chance. (sigh)
I am simply amazed. Have the Syrians been consulted on this as yet??
Trump says they are ALL going back.
I think it's a great solution. Simple and effective.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.