Posted on 11/17/2015 12:57:30 PM PST by amorphous
That's how Bill O'Reilly led his Fox News show last night, addressing Obama's press conference in Turkey in which the president defended his disastrously ineffective policies for dealing with the rapidly metastasizing terror army ISIS which, after last week's hellish Paris attacks, vows Washington, D.C., is next.
After the commercial break, O'Reilly started in again: "Is President Barack Obama delusional about ISIS? Joining us now from Washington, Charles Krauthammer. Is he?"
Responded Krauthammer, a Pulitzer-winning columnist and former psychiatrist: "Judging from the press conference, there are several explanations for that appalling performance; the kindest is that he’s delusional."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
LOL! And so true.
Thank you (I think). That is a frightening video. Western Civilization is in deep trouble.
Answer: Something worse.
He’s been sitting around for years designing all the ways to go about ruining the US. I honestly believe he is working for the Muslim Brotherhood. I think gay marriage was just a way for gays to self-identify. He is mentally ill.
Not delusional at all. He is on a mission of destruction in plain sight and laughing at how stupid congress and we are to watch him do it.
The longer we watch the bolder and more outrageous he becomes.
You have it RIGHT.
He's is a Muslim President who is running interference, at every turn, for his RADICAL MUSLIM brothers.
America needs fundamental change in the White House...... immediately
Ages ago I said he is the monster Szell in Marathon Man and we are the old woman crying for someone to stop him just before she is hit by a car and he slits the throat of the old jew trying to stop him.
We have allowed a terrorist into the white house. Half the idiots elected him. I hate them both and wish anything horrible upon them.
Ages ago I said he is the monster Szell in Marathon Man and we are the old woman crying for someone to stop him just before she is hit by a car and he slits the throat of the old jew trying to stop him.
We have allowed a terrorist into the white house. Half the idiots elected him. I hate them both and wish anything horrible upon them.
I guess that is a form of narcissism. But "malignant narcissistic personality disorder" probably goes too far. Take the arrogance of an academic and add the arrogance of a politician and a highly competitive environment that doesn't have much room for other people's feelings and you've got Barack Obama, different in degree from others in politics, but perhaps not in kind.
The funny thing about academia is that while it claims to be more worldly or cosmopolitan or internationalist than the rest of the country, its villains are usually at home. It doesn't have much of a sense of the dangers that come from outside the comfortable Western realm. Obama would like to lecture the country about the world outside, but his own view is sheltered and provincial and in many ways naive.
Hopefully whomever wins will reverse everything they legally can on the afternoon of January 20, 2017.
Yes, I was agreeing with you and noticed you are in good company in your thinking.
I am studying trying to understand the Middle Eastern thought concerning what we see happening and what has occurred in the past. We Americans have been fighting off these “political” and terrorist attacks since a few years after we became a nation (1801, First Barbaric War). Perhaps, if more voters realized Islamic Jihad (translated struggle) includes more than terrorism, we could protect America more effectively. Jihad includes temporarily peaceful aspects of using a host nations laws against the host nation to change the laws to be more Sharia Law friendly and to generate financial provisions for criminal acts of terrorism elsewhere. Also, it can include using birth rate and immigration to increase numbers in host nation. A dualism seems apparent in the teachings allowing individuals and groups to choose a peaceful action or speech. Or the individual or group can choose a more aggressive and violent action or speech. It seems to depend more on what the individual or group thinks will help their cause the most in the situation. Both choices are in agreement (dualism) with the teachings. And obviously, not all individuals or groups are in sync. Thanks.
None of this is by accident. It's very obvious this invasion of the West was well thought out and long planned.
May I recommend the following book (it's free if you have kindle unlimited):
It deserves another link: http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/11/11/watch-anti-migrant-video-going-viral-across-europe/
I look at Obama supporters as enemy because they are just that.
We're in for a world of hurt then!
{”I am studying trying to understand the Middle Eastern thought concerning what we see happening and what has occurred in the past. We Americans have been fighting off these “political†and terrorist attacks since a few years after we became a nation (1801, First Barbaric War). Perhaps, if more voters realized Islamic Jihad (translated struggle) includes more than terrorism, we could protect America more effectively. Jihad includes temporarily peaceful aspects of using a host nations laws against the host nation to change the laws to be more Sharia Law friendly and to generate financial provisions for criminal acts of terrorism elsewhere. Also, it can include using birth rate and immigration to increase numbers in host nation. A dualism seems apparent in the teachings allowing individuals and groups to choose a peaceful action or speech. Or the individual or group can choose a more aggressive and violent action or speech. It seems to depend more on what the individual or group thinks will help their cause the most in the situation. Both choices are in agreement (dualism) with the teachings. And obviously, not all individuals or groups are in sync. Thanks.”}
Well said. Would that all Westerners understood this. Obama does.
{”I am studying trying to understand the Middle Eastern thought concerning what we see happening and what has occurred in the past. We Americans have been fighting off these “political†and terrorist attacks since a few years after we became a nation (1801, First Barbaric War). Perhaps, if more voters realized Islamic Jihad (translated struggle) includes more than terrorism, we could protect America more effectively. Jihad includes temporarily peaceful aspects of using a host nations laws against the host nation to change the laws to be more Sharia Law friendly and to generate financial provisions for criminal acts of terrorism elsewhere. Also, it can include using birth rate and immigration to increase numbers in host nation. A dualism seems apparent in the teachings allowing individuals and groups to choose a peaceful action or speech. Or the individual or group can choose a more aggressive and violent action or speech. It seems to depend more on what the individual or group thinks will help their cause the most in the situation. Both choices are in agreement (dualism) with the teachings. And obviously, not all individuals or groups are in sync. Thanks.”}
Well said. Would that all Westerners understood this. Obama does.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.