Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exxon Mobil Under Investigation in New York Over Climate Statements
New York Times ^ | November 5, 2015 | JUSTIN GILLIS and CLIFFORD KRAUSS

Posted on 11/05/2015 12:10:39 PM PST by reaganaut1

The New York attorney general has begun a sweeping investigation of Exxon Mobil to determine whether the company lied to the public about the risks of climate change or to investors about how those risks might hurt the oil business.

According to people with knowledge of the investigation, Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman issued a subpoena Wednesday evening to Exxon Mobil, demanding extensive financial records, emails and other documents.

The focus includes the company’s activities dating to the late 1970s, including a period of at least a decade when Exxon Mobil funded groups that sought to undermine climate science. A major focus of the investigation is whether the company adequately warned investors about potential financial risks stemming from society’s need to limit fossil-fuel use.

Kenneth P. Cohen, vice president for public affairs at Exxon Mobil, said on Thursday that the company had received the subpoena and was still deciding how to respond.

“We unequivocally reject the allegations that Exxon Mobil has suppressed climate-change research,” Mr. Cohen said, adding that the company had funded mainstream climate science since the 1970s, had published dozens of scientific papers on the topic, and had disclosed climate risks to investors.

The people with knowledge of the New York case also said on Thursday that, in a separate inquiry, Peabody Energy, the nation’s largest coal producer, had been under investigation by the attorney general for two years over whether it properly disclosed financial risks related to climate change. That investigation has not been previously reported, and has not resulted in any charges or other legal action against Peabody.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; US: New York
KEYWORDS: censorship; climatechangehoax; exxon; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; obama; schneiderman; witchhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last
First Amendment be damned -- thou shall not question the gospel of Global Warming. I think it may be happening but that people or companies should not be prosecuted for doubting it.
1 posted on 11/05/2015 12:10:39 PM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Yes, if you disagree with the Church’s ....eh Government’s position on Science, you will be burned at the stake.


2 posted on 11/05/2015 12:13:14 PM PST by rbg81 (is pr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Everyday the paperboy brings more.


3 posted on 11/05/2015 12:13:24 PM PST by Jolla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

When will the Detroit automakers receive their subpoenas?


4 posted on 11/05/2015 12:13:27 PM PST by muglywump (Seven days without laughter makes one weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Exxon better push back hard. This is insanity.


5 posted on 11/05/2015 12:14:47 PM PST by subterfuge (TED CRUZ FOR POTUS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
First Amendment be damned -- thou shall not question the gospel of Global Warming

It really is the established State Religion demanded of the Left, isn't it? Gaia is their prophet(ess).

6 posted on 11/05/2015 12:16:22 PM PST by fwdude (The last time the GOP ran an "extremist," Reagan won 44 states.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
including a period of at least a decade when Exxon Mobil funded groups that sought to undermine climate science

Is that why they can't predict the weather worth a damn? Exxon's fault?

7 posted on 11/05/2015 12:18:31 PM PST by Toddsterpatriot ("Telling the government to lower trade barriers to zero...is government interference" central_va)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

“Exxon Mobil funded groups that sought to undermine climate science.”

Is that a fact? There were groups that sought to undermine science?

Bias much?


8 posted on 11/05/2015 12:19:58 PM PST by dsc (Any attempt to move a government to the left is a crime against humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

Yea but it’s the direct result of people determined to ‘win’ with ‘lesser evil’. Now their victory means a govt filled with leftists in both parties and no one to stop the insanity.

Actions have consequences.


9 posted on 11/05/2015 12:21:12 PM PST by Norm Lenhart (Existential Cage Theory - Embrace it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Kenneth P. Cohen, vice president for public affairs ... was still deciding how to respond.
Really? I'm thinking first you have to grow a pair and the rest will come naturally.
10 posted on 11/05/2015 12:21:48 PM PST by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Somewhere in hell, this man is smiling...


11 posted on 11/05/2015 12:23:49 PM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Maybe I’m asking the wrong question but doesn’t GW have to be at least codified into law just to give prosecutorial legal standing?


12 posted on 11/05/2015 12:24:33 PM PST by SteveinSATX (C'mon Cruz, Trump or Carson ...baby needs a new pair of shoes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Isn’t Exxon big enough to squash Schneiderman like a bug?


13 posted on 11/05/2015 12:25:27 PM PST by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Its no coincidence that this is happening one year before the 2016 elections. Its nothing but a shakedown for political contributions from Exxon.


14 posted on 11/05/2015 12:28:14 PM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
Its nothing but a shakedown for political contributions from Exxon.

I read something here recently that Exxon had stopped contributing to the Clinton Foundation.

Same difference.

15 posted on 11/05/2015 12:30:08 PM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SteveinSATX
Maybe I’m asking the wrong question but doesn’t GW have to be at least codified into law just to give prosecutorial legal standing?

Under Sarbanes-Oxley, or "SOx", a public company can be prosecuted by not anticipating future risks and reporting them to investors.

However, that's federal law. New York may have a different or even more stringent interpretation. If so, I don't know why any company actually does business there, unless the return outweighs the risk.

16 posted on 11/05/2015 12:32:01 PM PST by justlurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SteveinSATX
Maybe I’m asking the wrong question but doesn’t GW have to be at least codified into law just to give prosecutorial legal standing?

Indeed...seems like there would need to be some law or regulation already in place, where the potential financial effects could be measured, before XOM would have any duty to caution investors about any such effects, if any there may be. I'd say the prosecutor has a real uphill climb here, unless all he's trying to do is wrangle some sort of nuisance settlement out of XOM.
17 posted on 11/05/2015 12:33:09 PM PST by Milton Miteybad (I am Jim Thompson. {Really.})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

Thought control commissars.


18 posted on 11/05/2015 12:33:52 PM PST by phormer phrog phlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

Just saw your post. Thanks for the clarification.


19 posted on 11/05/2015 12:34:42 PM PST by Milton Miteybad (I am Jim Thompson. {Really.})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Click The Pic To Donate

Support FR, Donate Monthly If You Can

20 posted on 11/05/2015 12:41:52 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (The Fed Gov is not one ring to rule them all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson