Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama, GOP Want To Sell Off 40 Percent Of US Strategic Oil Reserves To Fund Gov’t Programs
Daily Caller News Foundation ^ | 10/28/2015 | Michael Bastasch

Posted on 10/31/2015 5:45:29 PM PDT by UMCRevMom@aol.com

Lawmakers are pushing legislation that could result in the selling off of 266 million barrels of oil from the country’s Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) over the next decade, mostly to fund more government spending.

Legislation for health care, highway funding and financing the government could end up drawing on down on oil supplies meant for emergency situations. If all three bills are signed into law, some 266 million barrels, or nearly 40 percent, of the current 695 million barrel SPR would be sold off in the next decade to raise about $23 billion.

“The 114th Congress has introduced three separate bills that would fund non-energy policy goals by mandating crude oil sales from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve,” according to an analysis by the consulting firm ClearView Energy.

ClearView noted the health care bill, called the 21st Century Cures Act, was the least likely to hit President Barack Obama’s desk despite passing out of the House with a veto-proof majority. On the other hand, the two other bills passing a budget and funding highways are more pressing issues to Republican and Democratic lawmakers. Just those two bills alone would draw down on 186 million barrels.

“Elected officials could face grave political penalties for failing to raise the debt ceiling or fund highway construction, but voters aren’t likely to notice the absence of [200 million barrels] of crude oil from salt caverns they can’t see,” ClearView noted.

“Moreover, swollen global inventories and falling oil production system capacity utilization tend to blunt the edge of geopolitical risk, which probably makes it easier for Congress to drill for dollars in the SPR,” the consulting firm added.

Calls to sell of SPR oil come amid a resurgence of crude oil production in the U.S. thanks to hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling. As crude output has boomed, U.S. lawmakers have called for a repeal of the crude oil export ban and other policies to help keep America’s energy boom going.

But a consequence of the fracking boom is the SPR has lost some of its importance. With booming crude production, lawmakers can politically afford to sell strategic oil reserves to fund government programs.

The White House called the budget bill “a responsible agreement that is paid for in a balanced way.”

Republican leadership negotiated the budget deal behind closed doors with White House officials and Democrats. The budget bill includes about $80 billion in spending increases — about $76 billion of which are offset by spending cuts and revenue increases, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Some Republican lawmakers are hesitant to support the budget, citing concerns over backroom dealings and that not all spending increases are offset. Some lawmakers were furious about their prized programs being cut, like federal crop insurance.

“Make no mistake, this is not about saving money. It is about eliminating Federal Crop Insurance,” said Texas Republican Rep. K. Michael Conaway said in a statement. “The House Agriculture Committee was not consulted regarding any changes to policies under the jurisdiction of our committee.”

It’s also unclear where key Republicans stand on selling off oil reserves to fund new government programs. Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski 18% has criticized such sales in the past, calling them “short-sighted.” This time around, however, Murkowski has been silent.

“Chairman Murkowski is currently reviewing the budget proposal as it relates to selling off oil from our strategic energy and national security asset – the Strategic Petroleum Reserve,” Michael Tadeo, Murkowski’s spokesman said in an emailed statement to reporters.

“As the budget process advances, we will further evaluate steps needed to update our nation’s energy and natural resources policies,” Tadeo said.

The SPR was created by President Gerald Ford in 1975 to improve America’s energy security should the country face another devastating oil embargo, like the one the Arab’s imposed in 1973 over U.S. support for Israel.

The SPR is the world’s largest supply of emergency crude oil with a capacity to hold 713.5 million barrels of oil.

Current legislative proposals to sell off oil aren’t the first non-emergency drawdowns to occur in recent years. In 2011, Obama sold 30 million barrels to offset potential price increases caused by the Libyan civil war — the sell off had negligible, temporary effect on oil prices.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: energy; hydrocarbons; methane; obamaoilreserves; oilreserves; opec; petroleum; sor; spr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last
To: Grams A
Selling our seed corn.

Exactly. Intentionally.

61 posted on 10/31/2015 6:57:21 PM PDT by FourPeas ("Maladjusted and wigging out is no way to go through life, son." -hg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative
The days of needing the SOR are long past

The SPR is there for unforeseen emergencies in production anywhere - including domestically. It was originally paid for long ago - then under Clinton the pubbies voted to start selling it off when the price was low. The price of oil rose and we started restocking. Now that prices are low again we are selling. Buy high - sell low. That is how our GoPeeers do it.

62 posted on 10/31/2015 7:04:42 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: VTenigma

“$23 billion over ten years. You could sweep that much up off the House floor. Idiotic.”

Relax! It’s not like they’re going to turn around and give it to Iran to help them develop nuclear weapons. Sheesh!


63 posted on 10/31/2015 7:05:36 PM PDT by Typelouder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

Oops, SPR. Getting old and can’t type worth a darn. LOL


64 posted on 10/31/2015 7:07:56 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Republicans hold Debates while Democrats hold Auctions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson

>>>Buy high - sell low<<<

Funny things like that happen when is isn’t THEIR Money.


65 posted on 10/31/2015 7:09:21 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Republicans hold Debates while Democrats hold Auctions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

So...they’ve burned through the savings, maxed out the credit cards, and now they are selling off the family heirlooms...

Time for a divorce, IMO.


66 posted on 10/31/2015 7:11:11 PM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2017; I pray we make it that long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

Selling a fixed asset should go directly to paying down debt. It shouldn’t factor into the budget at all.


67 posted on 10/31/2015 7:12:16 PM PDT by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

I heard a short while ago that some wealthy person paid the ransom for the art, so for now it is safe.


68 posted on 10/31/2015 7:13:38 PM PDT by Slyfox (Will no one rid us of this meddlesome president?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

Sitting on 90% of it doesn’t sound like Social Justice to me.....


69 posted on 10/31/2015 7:14:59 PM PDT by Paladin2 (my non-desktop devices are no longer allowed to try to fix speling and punctuation, nor my gran-mah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

sold to who?....what are all those goofy symbols in the text of the article???


70 posted on 10/31/2015 7:20:42 PM PDT by terycarl (COMMON SENSE PREVAILS OVER ALL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jim_trent

Is Obama telling the truth?

This sounds like another demonratic lie


71 posted on 10/31/2015 7:23:11 PM PDT by Fai Mao (Genius at Large)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: terycarl

For some silly techie reason “Quotation marks” within an article change to goofy symbols!


72 posted on 10/31/2015 7:33:50 PM PDT by UMCRevMom@aol.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Will88

I believe our debt is backed by real estate and our 401Ks.


73 posted on 10/31/2015 7:33:55 PM PDT by stevio (God, guns, guts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
... $23 billion.

Ludicrous.

The Feds spend that every two-and-a-half days.

74 posted on 10/31/2015 7:42:31 PM PDT by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

It’s called strategic for a reason.
It’s in case of war.


75 posted on 10/31/2015 7:42:35 PM PDT by BuffaloJack (Political Correctness is Suppression of Free Speech. Thank the Commies for Political Correctness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com
the felcher will sell it ALL before it's over
76 posted on 10/31/2015 7:43:20 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - Luke, 22:36)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

Buy high,sell low. Govt at its best............

Not to mention the obvious war clouds on the horizon. Not a smart idea.


77 posted on 10/31/2015 7:50:10 PM PDT by Finalapproach29er (luke 6:38)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will88; flaglady47; mickie; pax_et_bonum; seekthetruth; Bob Ireland
"How long before these incompetent fools try to sell Alaska to China?"

Sell Alaska to China?

NEVER!!!

Sell New York City back to the Indians for $24?

Maybe.....

Leni

78 posted on 10/31/2015 7:50:58 PM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: UMCRevMom@aol.com

WTF - buy high sell low?


79 posted on 10/31/2015 7:58:00 PM PDT by 11th_VA ("We're not gonna take it ANYMORRRRRE !!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

“communist programs” per chance?


80 posted on 10/31/2015 8:04:10 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-105 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson