Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sparklite2
Not that I approve of tolerating high-school kids fornicating in any format. But 99 percent of these cases turn out to be "consensual" until the young lady thinks better of it later.

Three counts sounds like statutory, and not forcible. Bad stuff, but dad, your little girl did not "stand up to the rape culture." She went along with the hook-up culture. A well-raised little girl would have smacked the clown in the ear and walked away, and there would have been nothing to complain about.

You know what's really stupid? Co-ed boarding schools. And you sent your daughter to one. I know y'all have money. But did you think human nature would be suspended in deference to it?

4 posted on 10/29/2015 2:30:58 PM PDT by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SamuraiScot
Three counts sounds like statutory, and not forcible.

The girl testified it was forcible. The jury acquitted him of the felony (forcible) counts, but convicted him of statutory rape.

5 posted on 10/29/2015 2:40:34 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SamuraiScot

It is a possibility that this case is a subtle mix of extreme naivete and gross stupidity (girl) and over eagerness bordering on at least mild coercion (boy).

Both testified there was no intercouse, but other things did happen. She testified that the current slang for intercouse only meant “making out,” and he testified that he thought it meant “the whole thing.” Thus, here willingness to go with him even though she wasn’t prepared for his intended activities.

I think the conviction, and thus sentencing, was harsh. I don’t think the case should have been brought. I can see some sort of punishment by the school, or even having his admission to Harvard rescinded.

The school did not create a gentleman in this case. And Harvard should more often exercise its right not to accept the morally degraded.

And the young lady should be scolded for getting into a situation that she almost couldn’t get out of.


6 posted on 10/29/2015 2:46:40 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SamuraiScot

in with the first “blame the victim” post...


11 posted on 10/29/2015 8:11:58 PM PDT by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson