It is a possibility that this case is a subtle mix of extreme naivete and gross stupidity (girl) and over eagerness bordering on at least mild coercion (boy).
Both testified there was no intercouse, but other things did happen. She testified that the current slang for intercouse only meant “making out,” and he testified that he thought it meant “the whole thing.” Thus, here willingness to go with him even though she wasn’t prepared for his intended activities.
I think the conviction, and thus sentencing, was harsh. I don’t think the case should have been brought. I can see some sort of punishment by the school, or even having his admission to Harvard rescinded.
The school did not create a gentleman in this case. And Harvard should more often exercise its right not to accept the morally degraded.
And the young lady should be scolded for getting into a situation that she almost couldn’t get out of.
Actually, he testified they didn’t have sex. She testified she was penetrated and she believes it was with his penis, because she could see both her hands.
As to whether is was consensual, who knows? Was it even actual sex? I don’t know.
I still thinking prosecuting was heavy handed. Was he a cad? Certainly? A rapist??? ...