Posted on 10/23/2015 8:31:54 AM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
A nurse held for three days in quarantine at a Newark hospital last year after aiding Ebola patients in West Africa has filed suit against Governor Christie and members of his administration, saying they violated her constitutional rights by holding her against her will without due process.
The nurse, Kaci Hickox, had spent a month in Sierra Leone treating Ebola patients and training other health workers for Doctors Without Borders. When she returned home on Oct. 24 and landed at Newark Liberty International Airport, she became the first health worker ensnared in the Christie administration’s new policy to impose a 21-day mandatory quarantine on travelers arriving from Sierra Leone, Liberia and Guinea who had come in contact with Ebola patients.
“We are filing this claim to hold those who made this decision accountable and also to highlight and fight against the lack of due process in the quarantine policy in New Jersey,” Hickox said Thursday via skype from her home in Oregon.
“It was clear to me that politicians and in particular Governor Christie were really reacting out of fear,” she said. “When you choose to detain someone out of fear that’s discrimination.”
The incident occurred last fall amid growing national worries about Ebola reaching the United States from West Africa, where an outbreak has killed more than 11,300 people and infected more than 28,500, according to the World Health Organization. Before Hickox’s return to the United States, a Liberian national who was visiting Texas died of Ebola at a Dallas hospital and Craig Spencer, a Manhattan doctor who had worked with Ebola patients in Guinea, set off a health scare in New York City after he rode the subway and visited a bowling alley while sick from the disease, though he didn’t yet know he had the virus. He has since recovered.
Related: N.J. releases details on mandatory Ebola screening and quarantine
Christie and New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo unveiled Ebola quarantine policies last October amid public concern that health workers who had been treating Ebola patients could not be trusted to self-quarantine when they returned to the United States. At one point, New Jersey had about 100 people in active monitoring, different than quarantine because they must contact local health officials daily and must take their temperatures and watch for symptoms.
Related: Ebola quarantine process criticized by health care worker isolated in Newark
When questioned about the quarantine policy last year, Christie defended it. “Your first and most important job is to protect the health and safety of the people who live within your borders, and the fact is that we’re doing exactly the right thing,” he had said. A poll taken a few weeks after the quarantine policy was implemented, 67 percent of New Jersey residents approved of the decision to quarantine Hickox, and just 19 percent disagreed.
Hickox, 34, is seeking $250,000 in compensatory and punitive damages. Norman Siegel, a civil rights lawyer representing Hickox, said that amounts to $2,000 for each hour of her 80-hour detention plus extra for punitive damages.
The 35-page complaint, filed in the United States District Court of New Jersey, also names as defendants Mary O’Dowd, the former state health commissioner, as well as Christopher Rinn and Gary Ludwig, two other employees of the state health department.
Siegel said Hickox is suing Christie and others as individuals, which could mean the governor would have to pay for his own private lawyer as well as pay any judgment himself if the court sided with Hickox. “It sends a message to other elected officials that they will be held personally responsible for actions like this,” Siegel said.
Christie spokesman Brian Murray said Thursday the governor would not comment on the suit because it is a pending legal matter.
Ebola spreads through direct contact with body fluids or through exposure to objects contaminated with the virus, such as needles. Symptoms, including fever, headache and muscle aches, commonly appear within eight to 10 days of exposure, but the maximum incubation period is 21 days.
In her complaint, Hickox argues that she followed all Doctors Without Borders infection control policies while in Sierra Leone, such as wearing protective equipment when in contact with patients and keeping a three-foot distance from people suspected of having Ebola.
After landing in Newark and telling immigration officials she had been treating Ebola patients, Hickox was held apart in a quarantine center at the airport. “No one told her what was going on or what was going to happen to her,” the complaint states. “There seemed to be no coordination among the persons who interviewed her.”
Among those who questioned her was a man wearing a weapon belt “who spoke to Hickox aggressively as if she were a criminal,” according to the complaint.
When someone tested her with a non-contact thermometer, it registered a temperature, but an oral thermometer later used at University Hospital in Newark showed no fever.
Hickox was taken from the airport to the hospital in an ambulance escorted by eight police cars with lights flashing and sirens blaring, and she was held in an isolation tent in an unfinished section of the hospital facility with inadequate heating, the complaint states. She had to ask for several blankets to keep warm, and had no access to the outside world other than her cell phone, which had weak reception, making it hard for her to send or receive email for personal or legal reasons, according to the complaint. She had access to a portable toilet but not a shower.
“I felt completely alone and vulnerable,” Hickox said. “It was really hard. I had a lot of tough moments.”
While being held, she showed no symptoms of Ebola, and threatened legal action with the help of the American Civil Liberties Union. At the time, Christie replied in response, “I’ve been sued lots of times before. Get in line. I’m happy to take it on.”
He also said he didn’t think the state’s quarantine policy would discourage health care workers from going to West Africa. “I think folks should understand part of the sacrifice is going over there and the remainder of the sacrifice is when you come home,” he said then.
Hickox was later released and went home to Maine, where she was kept under quarantine for several days until a Maine judge ruled she didn’t have to be quarantined.
Hickox’s experience became a cause celebre among other health care workers, and her case sparked national debate about how to handle people exposed to Ebola. Christie and President Obama also clashed publicly over the state’s quarantine policy.
Hickox said she did not sue University Hospital or the health care providers because they weren’t the ones who enforced the quarantine. She called the nurses, doctors and staff “wonderful, compassionate and kind.”
Before her stint in Sierra Leone, Hickox had also worked as a medical team leader, nurse manager and primary health care manager for Doctors Without Borders in Uganda, Nigeria, Sudan and Myanmar. Hickox married in the past year and moved to Oregon where she is “a clinical nurse educator for a large health care provider.” She has not been out of the country since Sierra Leone. But she said she hopes to do more humanitarian work overseas and hopes New Jersey’s quarantine policy is changed by then were she to land back in Newark.
Email: fallon@northjersey.com and oneillj@northjersey.com
It would have been shorter and more accurate for you to just say "I didn't answer your questions, because I can't."
Your link re: the first question was about sexual transmission. Which is interesting, because I was asking about asymptomatic transmission OTHER than sexually. So, your link doesn't answer the question.
And re: the second question, I didn't say "without fever," I said pre-symptomatic. As in, without SYMPTOMS. Ebola has other symptoms, y'know. So, saying that there is not always a fever does not, in any way, show that it can be transmitted before the onset of symptoms. Once again, your link does not answer the question.
Post 132 sparky.
And lack of fever in 12.9% of cases means...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3352042/posts?page=71#71
Doesn’t matter if she didn’t have a fever, she could have been spreading it.
Incubation period is 2 to 21 days.
She could have had it, been spreading it, and not had a fever.
They do NOT know everything about this bug yet as proven by the asymptomatic survivor giving it to someone else five months 155+ days after being “cleared”.
Which I responded to in Post 161, among other places.
And re: the second question, I didn't say "without fever," I said pre-symptomatic. As in, without SYMPTOMS. Ebola has other symptoms, y'know. So, saying that there is not always a fever does not, in any way, show that it can be transmitted before the onset of symptoms. Once again, your link does not answer the question.
I went back and looked at some of the old Ebola threads from last year, and wow - you were really leading the "EVERYBODY PANIC" charge back then. So, I guess this thread should not be a surprise. Because, man, to hear you folks tell it last year, we were facing a massive Ebola outbreak in the U.S. People like Hickox were going to lead to thousands, if not millions, of cases here. And, well, that didn't quite happen now, did it? How many people DID end up contracting ebola in the United States?
Tell me, were you relieved that you were so wrong last year, or were you disappointed?
It was only through the grace of God above that Ebola didn’t get out in the wild here.
Recall the Obama admin bringing people straight from the hot zone in.
I was glad it didn’t go down.
Thank God.
Now, will you host Ebola exposure victims in your house?
If not, why not?
You continue to ignore my questions. You continue to ignore the distinction between “without fever” and “asymptomatic.” You continue to ignore the distinction between “pre-symptomatic” and “asymptomatic.” You continue to ignore that the fact that it can be transmitted post-recovery in sexual fluids does NOT mean that it can be transmitted in other ways. And so you continue to just go around and around in circles.
So, I’m done. You have your opinion, I have mine. History happens to be on my side - there was no Ebola outbreak in the U.S. last year, despite the fears of chicken littles like you. So, good day.
(The answer to my other question was two, by the way. Two people contracted Ebola in the United States. Both of whom were nurses who treated late-stage ebola victim Thomas Duncan, with inadequate PPE and procedures. So, yeah, maybe the sky wasn’t falling.)
Or, because proper precautions and first-world infrastructure has a way of stopping Ebola outbreaks in their tracks (notice how it didn't spread in any of the other first-world countries that treated people during the outbreak last year?)
Recall the Obama admin bringing people straight from the hot zone in.
Victims were brought in for treatment in level 4 biocontainment hospitals, which were specially built for things like ebola and similar diseases.
Others coming in from the affected areas (not "straight" - there were not any direct flights from the affected countries to the U.S., before or during the outbreak) were screened.
Will you host Ebola exposure victims in your house?
If not, why not?
The “Me” generation rears its ugly head. An appropriate metaphor for this woman.
The same “medical experts” who let nurses in Texas get infected?
Because I agree with the generally-accepted protocols for people who may have been exposed to Ebola, protocols which helped to prevent outbreaks in the US and every other developed country.
The protocols call for avoiding close contact (including living with them). The protocols do not call for quarantine.
The Texas hospital screwed up royally. First, by failing to identify Duncan as a possible Enola patient the first time he came to the hospital. And then, by failing to implement adequate PPE and procedures when he came back. They flouted the protocols, didn’t follow them.
Will you host Ebola exposure victims in your house?
If not, why not?
I just answered your question. No.
“Because I agree with the generally-accepted protocols for people who may have been exposed to Ebola, protocols which helped to prevent outbreaks in the US and every other developed country.
The protocols call for avoiding close contact (including living with them). The protocols do not call for quarantine.”
I understood they were short handed where she was and she did pitch in with patient care for someone who died of Ebola. Am I wrong?
Won’t this woman ever go away?
She should be grateful that Norm wasn’t in charge (ECT). :-D
DANG!
But they have no symptoms!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3352042/posts?page=31#31
Even people I argue with extensively on practically everything support Existential Cage Theory. That shows you the power of ideas whose time has come ;)
Yup. So they are not contagious. But the risk of living with, sleeping with, or otherwise being in close contact with someone who has been exposed is that, if they do begin to exhibit symptoms, the risk is much higher that you will come into contact with the person’s now-contagious fluids.
Hence, the protocols recommend against close contact, but do not call for quarantine.
Well, I guess her boyfriend failed that one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.