[Conscience of a Conservative]

I gave you the link for your first “question”, not my fault you can’t follow it. And the other link about lack of a fever was a couple posts back. Happy hunting.

It would have been shorter and more accurate for you to just say "I didn't answer your questions, because I can't."

Your link re: the first question was about sexual transmission. Which is interesting, because I was asking about asymptomatic transmission OTHER than sexually. So, your link doesn't answer the question.

And re: the second question, I didn't say "without fever," I said pre-symptomatic. As in, without SYMPTOMS. Ebola has other symptoms, y'know. So, saying that there is not always a fever does not, in any way, show that it can be transmitted before the onset of symptoms. Once again, your link does not answer the question.

[Darksheare]

Post 132 sparky.

[Darksheare]

And lack of fever in 12.9% of cases means...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3352042/posts?page=71#71

Doesn’t matter if she didn’t have a fever, she could have been spreading it.
Incubation period is 2 to 21 days.
She could have had it, been spreading it, and not had a fever.
They do NOT know everything about this bug yet as proven by the asymptomatic survivor giving it to someone else five months 155+ days after being “cleared”.