Post 132 sparky.
Which I responded to in Post 161, among other places.
And re: the second question, I didn't say "without fever," I said pre-symptomatic. As in, without SYMPTOMS. Ebola has other symptoms, y'know. So, saying that there is not always a fever does not, in any way, show that it can be transmitted before the onset of symptoms. Once again, your link does not answer the question.
I went back and looked at some of the old Ebola threads from last year, and wow - you were really leading the "EVERYBODY PANIC" charge back then. So, I guess this thread should not be a surprise. Because, man, to hear you folks tell it last year, we were facing a massive Ebola outbreak in the U.S. People like Hickox were going to lead to thousands, if not millions, of cases here. And, well, that didn't quite happen now, did it? How many people DID end up contracting ebola in the United States?
Tell me, were you relieved that you were so wrong last year, or were you disappointed?