Trump Doubles Down On Bush 9/11 Remarks: "They Did Know It Was Coming"

Breitbart.com ^ | October 20, 2015 | Jeff Poor

[Biggirl]

On Tuesday’s “New Day” on CNN, Republican presidential front-runner defended his response aimed at his GOP opponent former Gov. Jeb Bush (R-FL), who had claimed in a debate earlier this month that the country was kept safe under former President George W. Bush.

[C. Edmund Wright]

I kneel in front of no man, but the establishment can seriously go fsck themselves, as can the ideology pimps.

I know you don't, but you sometimes slink back into the absurd arguments that those kneelers use. You're better than that.

[jimbo807]

Yah, ok. Thanks for the pep talk.

[chris37]

You have no point.

You are a GOPE groupie.

Your kind is really easy to spot. You should quit stinking up America.

[chris37]

Because he didn’t fly the planes into the buildings, you idiot.

Neither did Bush.

Nor did Jamie Gorelick.

Being a bad politician doesn’t make you a muslim mass murderer.

[ScottinVA]

LMAO!!!!

Wow — still steaming, are ya?

You’re obviously overwrought. Have a drink or two and cool your jets.

[chris37]

No, I’m eating my lunch and enjoying it quite nicely, and I don’t drink.

But that doesn’t mean I’m going to be nice to stinking GOPE groupie scum like you, so have a nice life.

[ScottinVA]

LMAO!! Love it.

You have no clue...

And my life is quite nice, thank you very much.

[chris37]

Okay, pumpkin.

Be sure to start your next post to me with LMAO and a bunch of exclamation points so that I know your laughing your ass off.

[Greetings_Puny_Humans]

Your reading comprehension is very third grade. Running as a traditional Republican is not the answer, nor is running on liberal talking points.

There's nothing particularly liberal with the truth. It's easily provable that the Bush administration was warned many times, even by Ukrainian intelligence (I just read that article the other night) 7 or 8 months prior. The Bush administration was even asked by the CIA to approve increased covert action against Al-Qaeda in March, but failed to do so.

I'll also add another dimension to the argument: illegal immigration in general has costed countless American lives every year. The murder rate by illegals, not to mention drugs and all the other crimes they commit, are very high.

All that is on Bush's hands, and on Jeb's, and on the GOP as a whole.

He

[ScottinVA]

You’ve got it.

How’s lunch, by the way?

[chris37]

It’s in mah belly!

And now it’s time for a game of soccer with a German Shepherd.

Later.

[C. Edmund Wright]

you don’t know jackshit about what caused 9-11...anyone who excuses Jamie gorelick is obviously too damned stupid to even understand the issue.

Back to your kindergarten class...

[chris37]

Yeah, I do, you stuck up ahole.

It was caused by muslim terrorists hijacking some planes and flying them into buildings.

That is EXACTLY WHAT CAUSED IT, and not one fsckin thing else.

Now, if you think that someone conspired with them in order to help them to achieve that goal, then by all means, report those people you suspect as accomplices to the FBI.

Otherwise STFU.

[C. Edmund Wright]

It was caused by muslim terrorists hijacking some planes and flying them into buildings. That is EXACTLY WHAT CAUSED IT, and not one fsckin thing else.

You debate like a 9 year old. Seriously, my son was far more coherent before he reached double digit age. So assuming I am dealing here with a person of shall we say very moderate intelligence at most, I'll go real slowly for you. Muslim terrorists flew the planes, duh....but who allowed their network to go undetected by the FBI and CIA? JAMIE GORELICK. She was at the Justice Dept and created the "wall" of separation between CIA and FBI. What did this wall do? It kept the CIA and FBI from combining information on Mohammad Atta - the ring leader - that would have busted the whole thing open.

And who was responsible for Gorelick getting that gig? CLINTON. Game, set match.

As you go forward and try to learn to sit at the adult table in political conversation, might I suggest that you consider the notion of "WHY" something happened. Smaller minds focus on who and what.....but WHY is an important question. It often answers the who question for us.....so WHY did our intelligence fail? Because it had been sabotaged by liberal policies from within.

[chris37]

So, Edmund, you are telling me that if I leave my front door unlocked, and a criminal decides to take advantage of the opportunity that my carelessness created, and comes in my house uninvited and robs me, that I caused my own robbery?

As opposed to the criminal who decided to rob me causing my robbery?

Are you telling me, Edmund, that a girl who goes to a party and gets drunk and passes out and gets raped by a guy who decided to take advantage of the opportunity that her careless behavior created, that the girl caused her own rape?

What you are basically saying is that if anyone makes any mistake at all in any aspect of their behavior, and some other predatory human exploits that opportunity, then the person who was exploited bears some responsibility for the choice that the criminal made to commit a crime.

There is no game, no, no set, no match, Edmund. You are simply trying to blame people as being responsible who had no specific knowledge of the attack that occurred that day.

Now, as I said, if you can prove that they did, in fact, have specific knowledge of the attack occurring on that day, then yes, they would have culpability, much in the same way that if a person knows that a murder is going to be committed and does not report it to police.

However, I do not think that you can prove that, but if you can, please inform the FBI.

Otherwise, STFU, because as I informed you yesterday, the people responsible are the ones who did it, and no one else.

If you think the authorities in power at the time failed in their duties, then fire them for incompetence, but remember that leaving the door open is not what causes a crime to occur. A criminal choosing to take criminal action is what causes a crime to occur.

What you can assume is that you are a person of moderate intelligence AT MOST, and what I will assume is that you are a person who likes to wrongly assign blame for political reasons, which incidentally is what gun control zealots do.

If you have no specific knowledge of an horrible event occurring, and yet you are able to prevent some event from occurring by way of coming across the plot in advance and then thwarting it, then great. If you can’t and it happens, then that is unfortunate.

Holding people to account for failing to prevent something that they did not know about specifically is dangerous.

Now, have a nice day, punk, and take your retarded insults and condescending attitude and stuff ‘em.

[C. Edmund Wright]

What I’m telling you moron, is that these criminals came through the door while Clinton was in charge - and then were not discovered because his justice Department was insuring that their links to each other could not be discovered.

Thus as bad as W was in the border, this particular situation didn’t have a G -DAMNED THING TO DO WITH IT. Meanwhile, blaming Bush from the left will BOOMERANG against us.

That you are willing to take total leave of your senses in your bot like love is just very illustrative. Get off your knees and button up his pants.

[chris37]

Real interesting opinion, Eddie. I certainly do not agree with it.

I don’t blame Bush, just like I don’t blame Clinton. I think I made myself clear on that. And do not refer to “us” as if I stand with you, because I don’t. I don’t care at all what happens to you or your party. As I told you, you are spreading blame for political reasons, and that’s what makes you wrong, and you have proved my point with your last post.

Therefore, I don’t see any need to continue any conversation with someone wrong and as sexually perverse and obscene as yourself.

You are disgusting.

Go choke on a bar of soap.