You debate like a 9 year old. Seriously, my son was far more coherent before he reached double digit age. So assuming I am dealing here with a person of shall we say very moderate intelligence at most, I'll go real slowly for you. Muslim terrorists flew the planes, duh....but who allowed their network to go undetected by the FBI and CIA? JAMIE GORELICK. She was at the Justice Dept and created the "wall" of separation between CIA and FBI. What did this wall do? It kept the CIA and FBI from combining information on Mohammad Atta - the ring leader - that would have busted the whole thing open.
And who was responsible for Gorelick getting that gig? CLINTON. Game, set match.
As you go forward and try to learn to sit at the adult table in political conversation, might I suggest that you consider the notion of "WHY" something happened. Smaller minds focus on who and what.....but WHY is an important question. It often answers the who question for us.....so WHY did our intelligence fail? Because it had been sabotaged by liberal policies from within.
So, Edmund, you are telling me that if I leave my front door unlocked, and a criminal decides to take advantage of the opportunity that my carelessness created, and comes in my house uninvited and robs me, that I caused my own robbery?
As opposed to the criminal who decided to rob me causing my robbery?
Are you telling me, Edmund, that a girl who goes to a party and gets drunk and passes out and gets raped by a guy who decided to take advantage of the opportunity that her careless behavior created, that the girl caused her own rape?
What you are basically saying is that if anyone makes any mistake at all in any aspect of their behavior, and some other predatory human exploits that opportunity, then the person who was exploited bears some responsibility for the choice that the criminal made to commit a crime.
There is no game, no, no set, no match, Edmund. You are simply trying to blame people as being responsible who had no specific knowledge of the attack that occurred that day.
Now, as I said, if you can prove that they did, in fact, have specific knowledge of the attack occurring on that day, then yes, they would have culpability, much in the same way that if a person knows that a murder is going to be committed and does not report it to police.
However, I do not think that you can prove that, but if you can, please inform the FBI.
Otherwise, STFU, because as I informed you yesterday, the people responsible are the ones who did it, and no one else.
If you think the authorities in power at the time failed in their duties, then fire them for incompetence, but remember that leaving the door open is not what causes a crime to occur. A criminal choosing to take criminal action is what causes a crime to occur.
What you can assume is that you are a person of moderate intelligence AT MOST, and what I will assume is that you are a person who likes to wrongly assign blame for political reasons, which incidentally is what gun control zealots do.
If you have no specific knowledge of an horrible event occurring, and yet you are able to prevent some event from occurring by way of coming across the plot in advance and then thwarting it, then great. If you can’t and it happens, then that is unfortunate.
Holding people to account for failing to prevent something that they did not know about specifically is dangerous.
Now, have a nice day, punk, and take your retarded insults and condescending attitude and stuff ‘em.