Posted on 10/14/2015 9:06:21 PM PDT by nickcarraway
SNIP
Of her dad’s feud with Fox News’ Megyn Kelly, Ivanka called the war of words “sensationalized” and “very much for TV.”
Shrugging it off further, she said in what sounded a bit like channeling the Donald, “Truthfully, it didn’t interest me that much.”
(Excerpt) Read more at pagesix.com ...
A pox on Fox! Fair & balanced my foot...
Megyn Kelly, Chris Wallace and Bret Baier tried to destroy the Trump candidacy. They later bragged about how hard they worked to develop questions designed to hurt Trump and save Bush. Those three clowns did nothing but drive the final nails into the coffin for Fox News.
.
Megyn Kelly asked questions designed to help Trump. Do you think Ivanka is working against her father?
Perhaps it could be the other way around. The media could be using Ivanka to find something against her father. I believe she will be campaigning for him, so I doubt it. Now they are on Ivanka and Melania to play GOTCHA!
Megyn Kelly said that she was designing questions hurt Trump. Her contribution: “You’ve called women you don’t like, ‘fat pigs,’ ‘dogs,’ slobs, and disgusting animals.” That was designed to help Trump? She didn’t think so.
I must have missed your “sarcasm” sign. Unless you think the entire performance was planned, orchestrated and sanctioned by both Roger Ailes and Trump for the overall effect of creating a theater of controversy. The thought has lingered in my mind since that hot August night.
Apparently the new polls are taking a box of Chablis and a handful of Prozac for Megyn to get a good night’s sleep.
Pray America wakes
Ivanka is a master of the casual understatement, just like her Dad. Recall when Trump shocked all of civilized society when he said “John McCain is a war hero because he got caught. I like my heroes to not get caught.
Where did she say that? She must be stupid then. If she wanted to hurt him, she should have asked him about policy or conservatism. She asked him about celebrity feuds and insulting people, the two things Trump loves to talk about. So she couldn’t have picked a question more suited to what Trump wanted. He might as well have written the question and passed it to her.
Wow! I couldn't have said it more accurately myself. That is exactly what Ailed and Trump love doing. 90% chance.
You must be a barrel of laughs at parties.
You should see me, Karl.
All her questions were designed to hurt whomever she was asking.
This is how pathetic she, and the others, see their job as being.
She displayed their attitude in her statement to Carson when he mentioned not being asked anything for a while when she retorted, oh we will be asking you things and you might be sorry we do.
That’s a paraphrase, but was their attitude. That they were trying to ask questions to hurt the candidates.
Funny thing is, even if this was mostly nothing but theater,
I’m not really upset about it, because important topics were brought up and closely examined from both sides. Roger knows his audience, and yes, I was at turns both entertained and gratified.
First, you suggest that she accused Trump of using degrading language about women (“You’ve called women you don’t like, ‘fat pigs,’ ‘dogs,’ slobs, and disgusting animals”) in order to help Trump (with the women's vote?); and
Second, you suggest that Trump so wanted to be confronted with those accusations that he "might as well have written the question and passed it to her."
You know, It is often said that anything is possible, but you're certainly putting that theory to the test. ;-)
Megyn the bimbo’s behavior was the last straw for me regarding Fox news. I do not watch it any more.
Of course it was. No such thing as bad publicity.
Kept in the news by none other than Trump himself with his tweets and retweets.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.