[rktman]

Counter headline should be: "At Umpuqua CC, more innocent people fall victim due the infringement of their 2nd amendment rights."

[driftless2]

Of course, the left's ultimate objective is to take away all the guns from the average citizens. For your own good of course. Then only the left-appointed functionaries will have guns.

Then the left says, oh by the way, there's several other rights er things we want to abolish. You know that pesky free speech thing. You really don't need that. There will be several other uh things we might need to abolish. For your own good naturally. What can you do about it now? Nothing. Bend over and take it.

[V_TWIN]

“despite these laws having the support of a majority of Americans.”

Not sure I even believe that.

[fishtank]

The GOA is a MUCH better organization.

I quit the NRA when they endorsed every single Dem incumbent in NM a few years ago.

[Norm Lenhart]

If the NRA wanted to end the problem, they would sue the government for civil rights violations on behalf of their members with RICO charges involving govt collaboration with anti gunners trying to deny rights under color of authority.

[Road Warrior ‘04]

God Bless the NRA!

[TexasCajun]

If the GOPe includes PP funding, Conservatives should put in funding for the NRA to conduct gun safety classes!

Then sit back and watch liberal heads explode.

[Billthedrill]

It’s the downside to Alinsky’s Rule 12: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” The practitioner begins to believe his own crap. In point of fact, the NRA is a lobbying organization consisting of between 4 and 5 million members. Its influence is far beyond its numbers - AARP, for example, is roughly ten times that size. Were every NRA member rounded up and put in a camp - and believe me, that’s a proggie wet dream - nothing much in the way of numbers would change. The NRA is a convenient target for the Two Minutes’ Hate, and if it didn’t exist they’d have to invent it.

[Starstruck]

Would someone please tell me what gun control law would have prevented this shooting. The guy had no criminal or mental health history. His guns were not bought using the so-called gunshow loophole. Executing 9 people when you have 6 weapons wouldn't require oversized magazines. Were so-called assault weapons involved?

The left always wants to put laws in effect that have nothing to do with what happened.

[CMailBag]

It’s the Obama ‘organization’ that is ‘gleeful’ when people have died.