Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Near term Commercial Fusion Power Possible -
nextbigfuture.com ^ | 9/25/2015 | brian wang

Posted on 09/25/2015 6:28:38 PM PDT by ckilmer

Near term Commercial Fusion Power Possible - Laser induced fusion of ultra-dense deuterium with double net energy gain has been produced and gain of 20 times is within reach

, , , , , ,

Researchers at the University of Gothenburg and the University of Iceland are researching a new type of nuclear fusion process. This produces almost no neutrons but instead fast, heavy electrons (muons), since it is based on nuclear reactions in ultra-dense heavy hydrogen (deuterium).

The new fusion process can take place in relatively small laser-fired fusion reactors fuelled by heavy hydrogen (deuterium). It has already been shown to produce more energy than that needed to start it. Heavy hydrogen is found in large quantities in ordinary water and is easy to extract. The dangerous handling of radioactive heavy hydrogen (tritium) which would most likely be needed for operating large-scale fusion reactors with a magnetic enclosure in the future is therefore unnecessary.

" A considerable advantage of the fast heavy electrons produced by the new process is that these are charged and can therefore produce electrical energy instantly. The energy in the neutrons which accumulate in large quantities in other types of nuclear fusion is difficult to handle because the neutrons are not charged. These neutrons are high-energy and very damaging to living organisms, whereas the fast, heavy electrons are considerably less dangerous."

Both heating generators and generators for electricity could be developed within a few years, according to research that has primarily been conducted at the University of Gothenburg.

Neutrons are difficult to slow down or stop and require reactor enclosures that are several metres thick. Muons - fast, heavy electrons - decay very quickly into ordinary electrons and similar particles.

Research shows that far smaller and simpler fusion reactors can be built. The next step is to create a generator that produces instant electrical energy.



International Journal of Hydrogen Energy - Spontaneous ejection of high-energy particles from ultra-dense deuterium D(0)


Highlights

• Spontaneous high-energy particles from D(0) are detected by energy spectroscopy.
• These high-energy unstable particles give linear Kurie plots, indicating beta decay.
• The signal due to the unstable particles is strongly increased by glass converters.
• Spontaneous line-spectra are observed in the energy spectra.
• The signal may be due to spontaneous nuclear processes in D(0).

Abstract

High-energy particles are detected from spontaneous processes in an ultra-dense deuterium D(0) layer. Intense distributions of such penetrating particles are observed using energy spectroscopy and glass converters. Laser-induced emission of neutral particles with time-of-flight energies of 1–30 MeV u−1 was previously reported in the same system. Both spontaneous line-spectra and a spontaneous broad energy distribution similar to a beta-decay distribution are observed. The broad distribution is concluded to be due to nuclear particles, giving straight-line Kurie-like plots. It is observed even at a distance of 3 meters in air and has a total rate of 10^7–10^10 per second. If spontaneous nuclear fusion or other nuclear processes take place in D(0), it may give rise to the high-energy particle signal. Low energy nuclear reactions (LENR) and so called cold fusion may also give rise to such particles.




AIP Advances - Heat generation above break-even from laser-induced fusion in ultra-dense deuterium

Previous results from laser-induced processes in ultra-dense deuterium D(0) give conclusive evidence for ejection of neutral massive particles with energy over 10 MeV u−1. Such particles can only be formed from nuclear processes like nuclear fusion at the low laser intensity used. Heat generation is of interest for future fusion energy applications and has now been measured by a small copper (Cu) cylinder surrounding the laser target. The temperature rise of the Cu cylinder is measured with an NTC resistor during around 5000 laser shots per measured point. No heating in the apparatus or the gas feed is normally used. The fusion process is suboptimal relative to previously published studies by a factor of around 10. The small neutral particles H N (0) of ultra-dense hydrogen (size of a few pm) escape with a substantial fraction of the energy. Heat loss to the D2 gas (at less than 1 mbar pressure) is measured and compensated for under various conditions. Heat release of a few W is observed, at up to 50% higher energy than the total laser input thus a gain of 1.5. This is uniquely high for the use of deuterium as fusion fuel. With a slightly different setup, a thermal gain of 2 is reached, thus clearly above break-even for all neutronicity values possible. Also including the large kinetic energy which is directly measured for MeV particles leaving through a small opening gives a gain of 2.3. Taking into account the lower efficiency now due to the suboptimal fusion process, previous studies indicate a gain of at least 20 during long periods.

The laser-induced nuclear fusion process in ultra-dense deuterium D(0) gives a heating power at least a factor of 2 larger than the laser power into the apparatus, thus clearly above break-even. This is found with 100-200 mJ laser pulse-energy into the apparatus. No heating is used in the system, to minimize problems with heat transfer and gas transport. This gives sub-optimal conditions, and the number of MeV particles (and thus their energy) created in the fusion process is a factor of 10 below previous more optimized conditions. Several factors lead to lower measured heat than the true value, and the results found are thus lower limits to the real performance. With the optimum source conditions used previously, a gain of 20 is likely also for longer periods.

Review of Scientific Instruments -Muon detection studied by pulse-height energy analysis: Novel converter arrangements

Muons are conventionally measured by a plastic scintillator–photomultiplier detector. Muons from processes in ultra-dense hydrogen H(0) are detected here by a novel type of converter in front of a photomultiplier. The muon detection yield can be increased relative to that observed with a plastic scintillator by at least a factor of 100, using a converter of metal, semiconductor (Ge), or glass for interaction with the muons penetrating through the metal housing of the detector. This detection process is due to transient formation of excited nuclei by the well-known process of muon capture, giving beta decay. The main experimental results shown here are in the form of beta electron energy spectra detected directly by the photomultiplier. Events which give a high-energy tail in the energy spectra are probably due to gamma photons from the muons. Sharp and intense x-ray peaks from a muonic aluminium converter or housing material are observed. The detection conversion in glass and Ge converters has a time constant of the order of many minutes to reach the final conversion level, while the process in metal converters is stabilized faster. The time constants are not due to lifetimes of the excited nuclei or neutrons but are due to internal charging in the insulating converter material. Interaction of this charging with the high voltage in the photomultiplier is observed.


Principle of the copper (Cu) cylinder setup. The temperature is read from the resistance of an NTC resistor fastened to the outer surface of the Cu cylinder as shown in the left-hand figure. The chamber is pumped continuously at the deuterium pressure of ≤ 1.0 mbar. No heat (left figure) is used in most experiments, while the highest gain is found for the construction to the right where D(0) from a slightly heated source is collected on the Cu surface.

Ultradense Deuterium Production announcement from 2009

Ultradense deuterium is a hundred thousand times heavier than water and more dense than the core of the Sun. The University of Gothenburg had announced microscopic production back in 2009.


UDD is an exotic form of metallic hydrogen (Rydberg matter) and is supposedly found along with the regular metallic hydrogen in the experiments performed by Dr. Holmlid and his group at the University of Gothenburg. The list of its exotic properties is long and it includes superconductivity and superfluidity at room temperature as well as its primary characteristic: enormous density. The estimates of its density vary from 1028 to 1029 cm-3 based on theoretical predictions and experimental observations. This density level is roughly 150 times than the originally predicted National Ignition Facility ICF target at peak compression. The enormous density would imply that, as shown by Winterberg, a very low energy input is required for the ignition of the fusion target, while completely circumventing the need for target compression and thus a series of physics issues that come along with it. The numbers estimate that a single PW-scale, 3 kJ laser beam would be sufficient to start the fusion reaction


SOURCES - University of Gothenburg, AIP Advances, Review of Scientific Instruments, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: deuterium; energy; fusion; hydrogen; inertialcontainment; nuclear; physics; pieinthesky
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: ckilmer

I don’t understand a headline claiming near commercial with no discussion of one of the most critical requirements of commercial operations.

Economics. At what cost? Thousands of concepts are technically feasible without being economic and therefore worthless as commercial.


21 posted on 09/25/2015 7:22:40 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

There are not many posts that I read aloud to my wife to get a real laugh out of. That one was very funny.


22 posted on 09/25/2015 7:33:38 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
I know it's in the popular lexicon, but strictly speaking, I would not call muon fusion "cold fusion." It isn't really a LENR requiring any mysterious or new physics. The much greater mass of the muons decreases the internuclear distance between protons in H2, allowing the Coulomb barrier to be lowered.

As you say, the production of enough muons to scale this has never been done with Q > 1.

23 posted on 09/25/2015 7:35:49 PM PDT by FredZarguna ("It appears a Kenyan has infiltrated the lumber room")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Fightin Whitey; EEGator

Kevmo was invincibly ignorant. There was just no way to get through to him whatsoever. He finally lost it on JimRob — on a thread completely unrelated to LENR — and got zotted.


24 posted on 09/25/2015 7:39:38 PM PDT by FredZarguna ("It appears a Kenyan has infiltrated the lumber room")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

You don’t have to be a physicist....Just look at all the LENR machines running in all the countries around the world ( as promoted and promised by all the fan boys for the last three years)

Oh wait.....


25 posted on 09/25/2015 7:48:37 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
The next step is to create a generator that produces instant electrical energy.

Ya mean like a double A battery?

26 posted on 09/25/2015 7:55:52 PM PDT by upchuck (Drinking buddies and BFFs: Satan, nobama and the AntiChrist. Different subject: Go CRUZ!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

Sure, why not? Nuclear bombs do this all the time.


27 posted on 09/25/2015 7:59:54 PM PDT by FredZarguna ("It appears a Kenyan has infiltrated the lumber room")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

“I want to see how bat shit crazy people can get.”

You’ve already seen who they vote for, what more do you need?


28 posted on 09/25/2015 8:05:22 PM PDT by RipSawyer (Racism is racism, regardless of the race of the racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp; TexasGator

“instant electrical energy”

What is that? Are they saying they can produce an electric current directly from the fusion process without going through the heat->steam->generator path?
.............
Yes and this is about the fourth small very high powered academic or corporate team I’ve heard talk about generating electricity directly from fusion reactions of one type or another.


29 posted on 09/25/2015 8:06:03 PM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: EEGator

I disagreed with him but I liked Kevmo and understood where he was coming from.


30 posted on 09/25/2015 8:08:56 PM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: thackney

quite true. for example you could get steady net energy generation but if the cost of doing so is exorbitant—why bother?

But likely the fusion scientists will say while the point is valid—in time costs would fall.


31 posted on 09/25/2015 8:12:09 PM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

There are not many posts that I read aloud to my wife to get a real laugh out of. That one was very funny.
...

your point would be insightful and instructive to everyone on the board—if you were first rate physicist and your dad knew edward teller—or you sat in class taught by Richard Feynman.


32 posted on 09/25/2015 8:17:13 PM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer
The journals cited are reputable.

The results described are intriguing, but there is no venture of a theoretical guess as to where the muons come from [and, I know it's a popularized article, but muons are not "massive electrons."]

The method of detection is in an instruments journal, not a journal of experimental physics, and as I said before there is no guess as to where the energetic muons come from: "must be a weak interaction," is not good enough. Every sophomore with his first course in quantum mechanics knows that you don't get muons without a weak decay.

At least one part of where the rabbit goes into the hat is in the production of this UDD, the energy required for this is not given...

33 posted on 09/25/2015 8:18:05 PM PDT by FredZarguna ("It appears a Kenyan has infiltrated the lumber room")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HartleyMBaldwin

Ultra high density (metallic) deuterium by catalytic condensation?

Has anyone brought up the possibility of leveraging a working concept to a pure fusion military type application?
If lasers can initiate a small mass (3 mg.), then it may scale larger with mere engineering. No tattletale radiation signature to detect if it is purely deuterium fueled.


34 posted on 09/25/2015 8:18:14 PM PDT by Ozark Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

Different animal here. See

23 posted on 9/25/2015, 10:35:49 PM by FredZarguna


35 posted on 09/25/2015 8:21:44 PM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Sure as hell ain’t my old can....I can hardly spell smoak and firre.


36 posted on 09/25/2015 8:24:19 PM PDT by bobby.223 (Retired up in the snowy mountains of the American Redoubt and it's a great life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

Muon catalyzed cold fusion has been around since the 1950’s, but no one has figured out how to make it net energy positive.

I think the output to input ratio has to be around 10 to 1 to be commercially viable.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
The title says

“double net energy gain has been produced and gain of 20 times is within reach”


37 posted on 09/25/2015 8:25:08 PM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp
What is that? Are they saying they can produce an electric current directly from the fusion process without going through the heat->steam->generator path?

Yes, and I know a little bit about this because this has been the plan for converting fusion byproducts into electricity for the Polywell Fusion reactor which I have been keeping up with for the last decade.

When you get high speed charged particles flying out of a nuclear reaction, you can simply put an obstacle in their path, and when they strike it, they will charge it to a high electric potential.

It's a viable system for a reaction that produces energetic charged particles rather than high speed neutrons which can only be converted into heat.

38 posted on 09/25/2015 8:30:09 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Zeneta

They also have 33 job openings according to their website.

This is a company to pay close attention to.
................
This is solid research. Its what makes google cool. I’ll bet starting with some combination of “ small modular fusion direct to electricity” and then refining your keywords —you could find 2-4 other groups doing similiar things.

There are two that come to mind. One you’ll find by googling skunkworks fusion. the other you’ll find by googling new jersey fusion. and maybe a third by googling mit fusion


39 posted on 09/25/2015 8:31:10 PM PDT by ckilmer (q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ckilmer

Be back


40 posted on 09/25/2015 8:47:12 PM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson