Islam is not consistent with the Constitution in any way, shape or form. Islam is poison.
Considering the fact that the Quran advocates lying to “infidels”, how would one ever determine if a Muslim was telling the truth about his/her adherence to the principles espoused by our founding documents? The current occupant of the White House comes to mind...
Carson is able to say the things that Trump can't.
“Mina” says the Iranian regime has been a huge supporter of President Obama, whose name in Persian, she notes, translates as “he is with us.”
What a shock...NOT!
Islam itself provides the answer. Any Muslim who repudiates Sharia is apostate, and other good Muslims are obligated to murder him. Being President requires taking the oath of office in which the person affirms he will take care to faithfully execute the laws of the United States and defend the Constitution. Some of those laws, like the recent ruling making same-sex marriage legal, and the free speech right to create works of art that offend Islam, openly oppose Sharia.
Thus a person can be a good Muslim or he can be President, but he cannot be both at the same time. The question being asked of Dr. Carson is either foolish, ignorant or is designed to create offense where there should be none.
The root of this question is an attempt by the democRATs to turn conservative Muslims in this country who would nominally vote GOP away from the GOP. There must be some internal RAT polling that indicates the GOP is vulnerable among these voters. Remember, the media and RATs work in concert to push the RAT agenda.
“I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation.”
Why do we keep talking about something America just did...twice?
Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system.
Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military components. The religious component is a beard for all the other components.
Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called ‘religious rights.’
When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agree to ‘the reasonable’ Muslim demands for their ‘religious rights,’ they also get the other components under the table. Here’s how it works (percentages source CIA: The World Fact Book (2007)).
see link ...
The very fact that this is even an issue speaks volumes to how low we have sunk as a nation.
Should a communist be president? Should a muslim be president? How about a goat humping pedophile who likes to set thing on fire?
Sure! Why not?
Let’s keep an open mind here. The current Muslim President has done a terrific job, so, why not elect another one?
“Muslims do not so much enhance European culture as supplant it, and are “patiently conquering Europe’s cities, street by street.”
Spot on and consistent with Mexico / Central America migration theory in the U.S.
Dr. Carson Is RIGHT!!
Quinnipiac Sept. 24
Carson 49% Clinton 42%
Bush 44% Clinton 42%
Fiorina 44% Clinton 43%
Trump 43% Clinton 45%
I take issue with his stance that a Muslim President would be bad but a Muslim Congressman would be ok. News Flash, Dr. Carson: both jobs require swearing to uphold the Constitution.
Let’s remember, too, that this is the same Dr. Carson who said during the debates that he would have worked with our “moderate Arab friends” to get Bin Laden instead of invading Afghanistan. That tells me that he has no understanding of the threat from Islamic terrorism.
Posted earlier about how “You shall know them by their fruits”.
“You will know them by their fruits.”
I so desperately wanted to hear this verse quoted when people wanted to debate whether Obama is Christian or Muslim. The best answer to give is:
“Obama says he is Christian and I am in no position to argue. All I can say is the Bible says ‘You will know them by their fruits.’ and you can look to see if Obama’s fruits are consistent with his claims.”
This alters the discussion to being not about who Obama claims he is but what Obama is doing to verify his claim.
"The Declaration of Independence recognized the European law of nations, as practiced among Christian nations, to be that by which they considered themselves bound, and of which they claimed the rights. This system is founded upon the principle, that the state of nature between men and between nations, is a state of peace. But there was a Mahometan law of nations, which considered the state of nature as a state of war – an Asiatic law of nations, which excluded all foreigners from admission within the territories of the state – a colonial law of nations, which excluded all foreigners from admission within the colonies – and a savage Indian law of nations, by which the Indian tribes within the bounds of the United States, were under their protection, though in a condition of undefined dependence upon the governments of the separate states. With all these different communities, the relations of the United States were from the time when they had become an independent nation, variously modified according to the operation of those various laws. It was the purpose of the Constitution of the United States to establish justice over them all.Adams' Address, by invitation of the New York City Historical Society in celebration of the 50th Anniversary of George Washington's Inauguration, can be read here." The commercial and political relations of the Union with the Christian European nations, were principally with Great Britain, France, and Spain, and considerably with the Netherlands and Portugal. With all these there was peace; but with Britain and Spain, controversies involving the deepest interests and the very existence of the nation, were fermenting, and negotiations of the most humiliating character were pending, from which the helpless imbecility of the confederation afforded no prospect of relief. With the other European states there was scarcely any intercourse. The Baltic was an unknown sea to our navigators, and all the rich and classical regions of the Mediterranean were interdicted to the commercial enterprise of our merchants, and the dauntless skill of our mariners, by the Mahometan merciless warfare of the Barbary powers. Scarcely had the peace of our independence been concluded, when three of our merchant-vessels had been captured by the corsairs of Algiers, and their crews, citizens of the Union, had been pining for years in slavery, appealing to their country for redemption, in vain. Nor was this all. By the operation of this state of things, all the shores of the Black sea, of the whole Mediterranean, of the islands on the African coast, of the southern ports of France, of all Spain and of Portugal, were closed against our commerce, as if they had been hermetically sealed; while Britain, everywhere our rival and competitor was counteracting by every stimulant within her power every attempt on our part to compound by tribute with the Barbarian for peace.
" Great Britain had also excluded us from all commerce in our own vessels with her colonies, and France, notwithstanding her alliance with us during the war, had after the conclusion of the peace adopted the same policy. She was jealous of our aggrandizement, fearful of our principles, linked with Spain in the project of debarring us from the navigation of the Mississippi, and settled in the determination to shackle us in the development of the gigantic powers which, with insidious sagacity, she foresaw might be abused.
" Notwithstanding all these discouragements, the inextinguishable spirit of freedom, which had carried your forefathers through the exterminating war of the Revolution, was yet unsuppressed. At the very time when the nerveless confederacy could neither protect nor redeem their sailors from Algerian captivity, the floating city of the Taho beheld the stripes and stars of the Union, opening to the breeze from a schooner of thirty tons, and inquired where was the ship of which that frail fabric was doubtless the tender. The Southern ocean was stiff vexed with the harpoons of their whalemen; but Britain excluded their oil, by prohibitory duties and the navigation act, from her markets, and the more indulgent liberality of France would consent to the illumination of her cities by the quakers of Nantucket, only upon condition that they should forsake their native island, and become the naturalized denizens of Dunkirk.
"In the same year, when the Convention at Philadelphia was occupied in preparing the Constitution of the United States for the consideration of the people, two vessels, called the Columbia and the Washington, fitted out by a company of merchants at Boston, sailed upon a voyage combining the circumnavigation of the globe, discovery upon the shores of the Pacific ocean, and the trade with the savages of the Sandwich islands, and with the celestial empire of China, all in one undertaking. The result of this voyage was the discovery of the Columbia river, so named from the ship which first entered within her capes, since unjustly confounded with the fabulous Oregon or river of the West, but really securing to the United States the right of prior discovery, and laying the foundation of the right of extension of our territory from the Atlantic to the Pacific ocean.
"All this however was but the development of national character in the form of private enterprise. The foreign affairs of the Union when President Washington assumed the administration of the executive power, were in a state of chaos, out of which an orderly and harmonious world was to be educed."- (Excerpt from John Quincy Adams' "Jubilee" Address, April 1839)
The world has truly gone mad and is bent on self-destruction. Illegal immigration must be stopped, then reversed or we have no right to exist. Not only have we forgotten what happened on September 11, 2001 but we are inviting it to happen all over again!
This acceptance of Mohammedism as a “religion of peace” is madness. Not only is it NOT a “religion of peace”, it is NOT a religion. It is a cult of hate founded by a camel-humping pedophile with not an original thought in his feeble brain, save slaughter.
Kowtowing to every demand by Mohammedans, here and abroad, is sheer lunacy. We are on a path to our slavery and destruction. We allow mosques to be built; we teach their filthy philosophy in our schools, we even import more terrorists to kill us.
It must end.
Posted by Facedodge back in 2011 but still relevant today.
Three strangers strike up a conversation in the airport passenger lounge in Bozeman, Montana, awaiting their flights.
One is an American Indian passing through from Lame Deer. Another is a Cowboy on his way to Billings for a livestock show and the third passenger is a fundamentalist Arab student, newly arrived at Montana State University from the Middle East.
Their discussion drifts to their diverse cultures. Soon, the two Westerners learn that the Arab is a devout, radical Muslim and the conversation falls into an uneasy lull.
The cowboy leans back in his chair, crosses his boots on a magazine table and tips his big sweat-stained hat forward over his face. The wind outside is blowing tumbleweeds around, and the old windsock is flapping; but still no plane comes.
Finally, the American Indian clears his throat and softly he speaks, “At one time here, my people were many, but sadly, now we are few.”
The Muslim student raises an eyebrow and leans forward, “Once my people were few,” he sneers, “and now we are many. Why do you suppose that is?”
The Montana cowboy shifts his toothpick to one side of his mouth and from the darkness beneath his Stetson says in a drawl,
“That’s ‘cause we ain’t played Cowboys and Muslims yet, but I do believe it’s a-comin’.”