Posted on 09/23/2015 8:20:38 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
The thing with AC is that she presents herself to be something she clearly isn’t. A conservative.
She talks the talk and then, when it matters most, election day, totally abandons everything she states for the other 23/47 months and screams ‘no matter what!”
She claims to be anti abortion and to this day pimps a man that profits from (stericycle), legislated for and gave personal money to, Planned Parenthood. That one single issue proves where her beliefs lie. You cannot be something and do it’s polar opposite if you are Ann Couler, Mitt Romney, Norm Lenhart or any human walking the earth. Words and actions mean things.
And lie she does. She outright lied about Romney. Christie and every other GOPe she has pimped over her career as a ‘conservative’. She did all in her power to trash Palin. And she continues to present long discussed topics here as original thinking.
The woman deserves scorn, not defense or praise. Not because Normie says so. Because her actual actions warrant it from anyone that believes in conservative values.
“Politically, Conservatives are probably dead already.”
Then explain how Republicans now control 26 states, while the rats only control 11. In a number of states, not a single rat holds state-wide office. In the mid-term elections, rats were annihilated.
He said Conservative, not Republican, big difference.
If office-holding is the goal, then “conservatives” are doing fine. If enacting policy is the goal, then liberals are running up the score.
The plans for the North American Union continues apace and the GOP is fully on board.
To what effect?
Pay attention, class. I’m referring to STATES, not the federal government.
On the state level, conservatives are expanding 2nd amendment rights, defunding Planned Parenthood, challeging the EPA’s illegal diktats and enacting other state laws to hinder the operation in their states of the criminal fascist syndicate occupying Washington.
And, as I said, Trump's school has little to do with what sort of person he is. He's a force of nature and those are born, not made.
Let me know when a state stops a single third world immigrant from taking up residence on its territory.
I like Trump despite Ann Coulter - with that said, Trump went to a military school before college because he was acting up as a teenager. The military school is still around but struggling financially. I am assuming the lessons learned helped make Donald successful in life. Discipline is not an easy thing to learn. The way Trump sleeps (seems to sleep early and wake up early) is a sign of that disciplined training he probably got at the school.
Republican insiders are the Washington Generals to the Democrats’ Harlem Globetrotters. They enjoy being good losers. That’s their job.
Yep. Nailed it.
I went back and read the original tweet story. Ann got upset that our candidates were voicing support for Israel. She thought that all Republicans support Israel, so what was the need to mention Israel.
She stated something to the effect how unnecessary that was, and asked, “How many ====ing Jews” did they think were in our nation.”
Ann may think all Republicans are pro Israel. I honestly don’t care. I do think a mention of Israel is appropriate these days because we have a lousy president who doesn’t support it.
Is support for Israel a litmus test. Frankly, for me, it most definitely is.
Israel is a speck of sanity in an ocean of insanity (regionally). It should be defended stridently, to avoid any adventurism against it.
Perhaps you could degrade this to extreme crassness rather than overt racism.
What you are then left with is a woman so clueless that she can’t understand the overt support for Israel. That in an of itself is questionable.
She can’t grasp why it’s important to voice support for Israel even though we all do?
What would it look like if none of us voiced support for Israel Ann?
Wouldn’t it look like open season on Israel? Wouldn’t it look like exactly what Obama wants?
Ann really doesn’t get it. That to me is as troubling as the terminology she uses.
I learned long ago that I was wasting my time by addressing anything of reason to the great ego of N.L.
I’ve seen people explain it. It was foreign concept to me as well. I don’t remember the thought process. It’s so foreign to me that it didn’t stick with me. Not saying it wasn’t reasoned. I just don’t think that way.
IMO, if there’s something you don’t want, or something you do, you do everything to support your position.
If you don’t want Israel abandoned, you don’t vote for anyone who doesn’t support it.
If you do what Israel supported, you only vote for people who do support it.
Side issues aside, isn’t survival your primary drive?
IMO< you are dead wrong there.
Israel is a spec of sanity in a sea of Middle Eastern insanity.
Is support for Israel a litmus test for me. You better believe it.
I asked this moments ago in another post.
“What would it look like if our candidates didn’t openly voice support for Israel?”
Think about that. It would look like Israel had been set adrift. Adventurism against it would be more likely. Frankly it would look a lot like Obama’s dream situation.
Don’t discount the good done when Israel is addressed by each candidate.
It sends a clear and loud message. I support that stridently.
My take as well. I'm betting she also shares your belief of how important Israel is geopolitically. IMHO, Her poorly worded point was referencing some transparent pandering to a demographic that overwhelming supports the other side.
Yes, I believe a large segment of that demographic in the U. S. votes against their own self-interest.
Being sincere in my beliefs, I will still support Israel and them, even if they are too misguided to.
As for mentioning support for Israel, it’s a necessary thing IMO.
I can’t defend Ann on this one. She left herself twisting in the wind IMO. There are several aspects to this, and she didn’t do herself any favors with her comments.
HA! I laugh at your ignorance! I’m Jewish and telling you that I’m not offended by Coulter’s comments because Coulter is absolutely correct. Restating Republican support for Israel is a waste of time. WE KNOW!
It’s pandering for money. That’s what politicians do.
More Jews voted for Romney more than any other US President. it’s enough with the pandering stuff. Daily I read on this site how stupid Jews are.
When inquiring to volunteer, I was told by a GOP campaign worker Jews would never be conservative. I would be wasting my time, blah blah blah.
Republicans are no different than Democrats on this issue. They pander to groups on divisive issues for money.
I want what is best for AMERICANS. I’m an AMERICAN CITIZEN. I want policy that is good for ALL AMERICANS regardless of race, religion, etc.
Try pandering to AMERICANS!
I’m surprised at you guys, guys I normally read and respect. You’re picking this Ann Coulter thing to death and going nowhere.
Ann is actually a more conservative conservative than most. Pundits and Freepers alike. She’s sharp and, come on, she’s original, even if she does say what’s been said sometime before here on our great Free Republic.
I hope someone will post a link to her original pottymouth tweet, so we can all gain perspective. It would be totally out of character for Ann to demean Jewsj.
I was under the impression she was somehow “aping” the adorable Hillary, notorious for her snarling wolf bitch language:
This from the WND article, “Hillary’s cursing ‘would make Howard Stern blush’ “:
In an interview shortly thereafter, Hillary Clinton assumed the role of champion of Senate high decorum, stating: “So far as I know, no colleague has ever used profanity of that sort on the Senate floor. For the vice president to use his position, as president of the Senate, to insult a senator and then be unapologetic about it introduces a level of discord into Senate procedure that is unfortunate.”
After Clinton’s high-toned remarks, however, her critics pointed to her own reputation for an explosive temper. In 2000, a book famously reported that she said, “You f—ing Jew bastard!” more than two decades ago to a campaign aide. Jerry Oppenheimer’s “State of a Union: Inside the Complex Marriage of Bill and Hillary Clinton” cites three sources who heard the remark.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2004/07/25454/#Cj5XyFwZX5oS7Z5Y.99
Someone put up the tweet remark link.
Meanwhile, you guys shape up. You are getting tiresome with your nitpicking.
Explain this please. The pro-amnesty Bush family refused to endorse Romney because of his immigration record and rhetoric.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.