Replies

I went back and read the original tweet story. Ann got upset that our candidates were voicing support for Israel. She thought that all Republicans support Israel, so what was the need to mention Israel.

She stated something to the effect how unnecessary that was, and asked, “How many ====ing Jews” did they think were in our nation.”

Ann may think all Republicans are pro Israel. I honestly don’t care. I do think a mention of Israel is appropriate these days because we have a lousy president who doesn’t support it.

Is support for Israel a litmus test. Frankly, for me, it most definitely is.

Israel is a speck of sanity in an ocean of insanity (regionally). It should be defended stridently, to avoid any adventurism against it.

Perhaps you could degrade this to extreme crassness rather than overt racism.

What you are then left with is a woman so clueless that she can’t understand the overt support for Israel. That in an of itself is questionable.

She can’t grasp why it’s important to voice support for Israel even though we all do?

What would it look like if none of us voiced support for Israel Ann?

Wouldn’t it look like open season on Israel? Wouldn’t it look like exactly what Obama wants?

Ann really doesn’t get it. That to me is as troubling as the terminology she uses.

"Ann got upset that our candidates were voicing support for Israel. She thought that all Republicans support Israel, so what was the need to mention Israel."

My take as well. I'm betting she also shares your belief of how important Israel is geopolitically. IMHO, Her poorly worded point was referencing some transparent pandering to a demographic that overwhelming supports the other side.

I’m surprised at you guys, guys I normally read and respect. You’re picking this Ann Coulter thing to death and going nowhere.

Ann is actually a more conservative conservative than most. Pundits and Freepers alike. She’s sharp and, come on, she’s original, even if she does say what’s been said sometime before here on our great Free Republic.

I hope someone will post a link to her original pottymouth tweet, so we can all gain perspective. It would be totally out of character for Ann to demean Jewsj.

I was under the impression she was somehow “aping” the adorable Hillary, notorious for her snarling wolf bitch language:

This from the WND article, “Hillary’s cursing ‘would make Howard Stern blush’ “:

In an interview shortly thereafter, Hillary Clinton assumed the role of champion of Senate high decorum, stating: “So far as I know, no colleague has ever used profanity of that sort on the Senate floor. For the vice president to use his position, as president of the Senate, to insult a senator and then be unapologetic about it introduces a level of discord into Senate procedure that is unfortunate.”

After Clinton’s high-toned remarks, however, her critics pointed to her own reputation for an explosive temper. In 2000, a book famously reported that she said, “You f—ing Jew bastard!” more than two decades ago to a campaign aide. Jerry Oppenheimer’s “State of a Union: Inside the Complex Marriage of Bill and Hillary Clinton” cites three sources who heard the remark.

Someone put up the tweet remark link.

Meanwhile, you guys shape up. You are getting tiresome with your nitpicking.