[DannyTN]

Okay, so then what is your solution?

The marshalls are going to obey the judge. Thus Kim Davis is in jail for not obeying the judge.

The judge is wrong. But the judge is implementing the SCOTUS ruling as he understands it.

We need to impeach the justices.

Cruz’s comment that he stands with the clerk does nothing.

Trump’s comment that the rule of law needs to be obeyed, is valid and does nothing.

You say this is not law, but until congress gets off it’s butt and impeaches someone, it really is law.

[Mariner]

"You say this is not law, but until congress gets off it’s butt and impeaches someone, it really is law."

Anyone who believes otherwise is living in an alternative universe. It's certainly not connected to the one most of us live in.

ANYONE who thinks this affront to faith can be altered or changed by any means besides a ratified Constitutional Amendment is just plain stupid.

[Jim W N]

The Constitution itself says unconstitutional federal law is not valid law.

So the feds have been ignoring the Constitution for some time. Do you understand that unconstitutional federal acts are acts of tyranny? So the question is how do we deal with federal tyranny and fight for our God-given and Constitutionally protected freedoms against the federal tyrants?

The answer is state-by-state as supported by the Supremacy Clause and confirmed by the Ninth and Tenth Amendments.

Here’s how it goes...

Article VI, Clause 2 (the Supremacy Clause) of the U.S. Constitution, confirmed by the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, give individual states valid basis for nullifying and rejecting unconstitutional federal acts which by definition are acts of tyranny. Individual states must begin doing this, which, of course will mean those states must be ready for financial independence from the feds – but of course that is the basis of America’s beginnings to begin with – INDEPENDENCE.

Individual states must in good-faith nullify unconstitutional federal acts and notify the feds and the world why the nullified and rejected acts are unconstitutional. This is the only basis for state action towards further independence from the feds which one would hope would not be needed unless necessary.

At some point, individual state secession may be necessary. The Declaration of Independence gives instruction and guidance for valid secession. The D of I shows valid secession 1) should not be “for light or transient causes” 2) requires a certain “patient sufferance” while “evils are sufferable” 3) notifying and submitting the facts of abuse “to a candid world” (27 specific abuses are listed in the D of I) and finally 4) When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty to throw off such Government.” This is not a constitutional dictate, but, as the D of I says, what “Prudence, indeed, will dictate...”

[Carry_Okie]

Okay, so then what is your solution?

The marshalls are going to obey the judge. Thus Kim Davis is in jail for not obeying the judge.

The solution is simple and legal: The County Sheriff is the chief law enforcement officer in that jurisdiction. Have the County Sheriff arrest the Federal Marshalls and free Kim Davis.

Make Commander Xero send troops.

[Elsie]

The marshalls are going to obey the judge. Thus Kim Davis is in jail for not obeying the judge.

[Carry_Okie]

OK that was the short term solution (that you couldn't stomach); the long term solution is for Congress to declare marriage outside the jurisdiction of the Federal courts by statute, which is also Constitutional and does not require an amendment.

Maybe you Chumps for Trump could use an education? Stick with him and you'll get one, good and hard.