Replies

The Constitution itself says unconstitutional federal law is not valid law.

So the feds have been ignoring the Constitution for some time. Do you understand that unconstitutional federal acts are acts of tyranny? So the question is how do we deal with federal tyranny and fight for our God-given and Constitutionally protected freedoms against the federal tyrants?

The answer is state-by-state as supported by the Supremacy Clause and confirmed by the Ninth and Tenth Amendments.

Here’s how it goes...

Article VI, Clause 2 (the Supremacy Clause) of the U.S. Constitution, confirmed by the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, give individual states valid basis for nullifying and rejecting unconstitutional federal acts which by definition are acts of tyranny. Individual states must begin doing this, which, of course will mean those states must be ready for financial independence from the feds – but of course that is the basis of America’s beginnings to begin with – INDEPENDENCE.

Individual states must in good-faith nullify unconstitutional federal acts and notify the feds and the world why the nullified and rejected acts are unconstitutional. This is the only basis for state action towards further independence from the feds which one would hope would not be needed unless necessary.

At some point, individual state secession may be necessary. The Declaration of Independence gives instruction and guidance for valid secession. The D of I shows valid secession 1) should not be “for light or transient causes” 2) requires a certain “patient sufferance” while “evils are sufferable” 3) notifying and submitting the facts of abuse “to a candid world” (27 specific abuses are listed in the D of I) and finally 4) When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty to throw off such Government.” This is not a constitutional dictate, but, as the D of I says, what “Prudence, indeed, will dictate...”

"This is the only basis for state action towards further independence from the feds which one would hope would not be needed unless necessary."

Nay...

Article V Convention. It's the SHORTEST path to an Amendment.

But I doubt it's likely to get 2/3 to propose and 3/4 to ratify a Biblical definition of Marriage.

It's worth a shot though.