Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: [Clerk Kim] Davis held in contempt taken by U.S. Marshals.
twitter ^ | 09/03/2015 | Dan Griffin WSAZ

Posted on 09/03/2015 10:03:37 AM PDT by GIdget2004

Dan Griffin ‏@WSAZDanGriffin 2m2 minutes ago Judge says financial fines not enough. #WSAZ

Dan Griffin ‏@WSAZDanGriffin 4m4 minutes ago BREAKING: Davis held in contempt taken by U.S. Marshals. #WSAZ

(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Kentucky
KEYWORDS: gaykkk; homofascism; homosexualagenda; kentucky; kimdavis; kyclerk; libertarians; medicalmarijuana
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 741-747 next last
To: Nep Nep

Do you support child marriage?
Do you support consanguineous marriage?

Why/Why not?


661 posted on 09/03/2015 4:31:30 PM PDT by Ray76 (When a gov't leads it's people down a path of destruction resistance is not only a right but a duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 656 | View Replies]

To: Nep Nep

Nep Nep
Since Jul 30, 2015


662 posted on 09/03/2015 4:34:18 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 656 | View Replies]

In Kentucky a couple under 16, with a pregnant female, may marry with a judge’s permission and $5.00 payment. Ky. Rev. Stat. 402.020(1)(f)(3)

In New York marriage where either party is under the age of 14 is prohibited. N.Y. Dom. Rel. § 15-a

If two Kentucky 14 year olds, expecting a child, elope to New York they will not be able to marry. In NY any person issuing a license for such marriage “shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction thereof shall be fined in the sum of one hundred dollars.”

Surely this is discriminatory, a violation of equal protection, etc.

The Supreme Court said, “No union is more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice, and family. In forming a marital union, two people become something greater than once they were. As some of the petitioners in these cases demonstrate, marriage embodies a love that may endure even past death. It would misunderstand these men and women to say they disrespect the idea of marriage. Their plea is that they do respect it, respect it so deeply that they seek to find its fulfillment for themselves. Their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness, excluded from one of civilization’s oldest institutions. They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right.”

Why should these 14 year olds be denied the respect of marriage? Why are they denied equal dignity?

Since the Supreme Court has arrogated to themselves the power to legislate, the power to commandeer State legislatures, why haven’t they provided a uniform marriage code for the entire United States? Why are they disrespecting the idea of marriage, “the highest ideals of love and devotion”?


663 posted on 09/03/2015 4:41:36 PM PDT by Ray76 (When a gov't leads it's people down a path of destruction resistance is not only a right but a duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat
Where do we send money for her defense?

I want to know too ....

664 posted on 09/03/2015 4:48:13 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ray76
Obergefell is an atrocity which no State should abide. States must defend their people from this monstrous and illegitimate overreach by the USSC.
665 posted on 09/03/2015 4:51:10 PM PDT by Ray76 (When a gov't leads it's people down a path of destruction resistance is not only a right but a duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 663 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
Religious freedom is protected in the First Amendment to the US Constitution.

Yes it is. And for the arseholes here on FR who say she should just issue the licenses or quit her job, let me remind you that RELIGIOUS FREEDOM has no limits in the Constitution.

Nowhere in the Constitution or any Amendments does it say that one is not permitted to live out their faith simply because the government says so, or they hold a government job.

NOWHERE.

I stand with Kim Davis.

666 posted on 09/03/2015 4:52:30 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

Various pols are weighing in and defending Davis with a religious freedom argument. This argument is doomed to failure. It is better to confront the illegitimate actions of the USSC.


667 posted on 09/03/2015 5:02:43 PM PDT by Ray76 (When a gov't leads it's people down a path of destruction resistance is not only a right but a duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies]

To: Nep Nep
Having government employees freelancing on policy rather than following the law would be a Pandora’s Box that would let meddling socialist bureaucrats run even wilder than they already are.

You miss the facts. Kim Davis was not arrested for violating a law, she was arrested for disobeying a judge. IF such a law were on the books there would have been no need for the judicial theatrics thus far.

Last time I checked, judges don't write laws and states trump the fed regarding marriage jurisdiction.

668 posted on 09/03/2015 5:27:19 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Ray76

You are being idiotic.
I support the union of one man and one woman who consummate their marriage in the eyes of God and His church.
Any more benighted questions Sparky?


669 posted on 09/03/2015 5:35:37 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Kim Davis was upholding the laws of the State of Kentucky, the only jurisdiction that exists in this matter.

That's the way I see it. Picking on some lowly clerk is intimidation of the people when the Feds should be addressing these issues with the state's legislature.

670 posted on 09/03/2015 6:07:55 PM PDT by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 645 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

The opposition has already decided that anything goes. Isn’t it about time we refused to allow them to play?
You talk about the supposed protections that government defined marriage provides in the face of celebrating and licensing buggering. WTH.


671 posted on 09/03/2015 6:13:56 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 624 | View Replies]

To: pollywog

Amen!


672 posted on 09/03/2015 7:02:56 PM PDT by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies]

To: DBeers

Try disobeying a judge and see what happens to you... it won’t go any different for you.

It’s not because of a law written by any court, it’s because of a law passed by Congress, specifically 18 U.S.C. §401 (1964), the federal contempt statute.

As far as 9th/10th Amendment jurisdiction is concerned, I wholly agree. But if those Amendments are suddenly in force again, 90% of the federal government has to be unwound - and the sad truth is that 90% of this country doesn’t want that to happen.


673 posted on 09/03/2015 7:04:30 PM PDT by Nep Nep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies]

To: Nep Nep

It would have taken less space to just concede your false assertion.


674 posted on 09/03/2015 7:16:58 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 673 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Prayers for her and her family.


675 posted on 09/03/2015 7:50:22 PM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
Another ping to you guys who think the 14th amendment was such a great idea.

The First Amendment expressly limits only the power of Congress. Do we need the 14th Amendment to protect us from states that might want to deny you any freedom of speech, religion, etc? There might be some good with the bad here.

676 posted on 09/03/2015 8:18:53 PM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Do you support child marriage?
Do you support consanguineous marriage?

Yes or No?

I am not interested in your religion.

Yes or no.


677 posted on 09/03/2015 10:15:52 PM PDT by Ray76 (When a gov't leads it's people down a path of destruction resistance is not only a right but a duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 669 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

Do you support child marriage?
Do you support consanguineous marriage?

Yes or No?


678 posted on 09/03/2015 10:17:15 PM PDT by Ray76 (When a gov't leads it's people down a path of destruction resistance is not only a right but a duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 612 | View Replies]

Comment #679 Removed by Moderator

To: bray

Christians need not apply for gummit jobs. You must worship at the alter of an all powerful government.


Maybe that is the mark of the beast. Under a socialist world where everyone works for the govt or they can’t buy or sell...eat or survive.


680 posted on 09/03/2015 10:30:26 PM PDT by free_life (If you ask Jesus to forgive you and to save you, He will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 741-747 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson