You make a false assumption because you cannot answer the basic question. An employee does not have the right to determine the services and products of the employer. If you equate homosexuals getting married to murdering the sick and elderly, that’s for you to explain not me.
You question is hyperbolic and a gross one at that. The answer to your ridiculous attempt, us no I would not do so, nor would I work at an abortion clinic, or as a clerk issuing gay marriage licenses. I provide donations to organizations and campaigns which believe as I do. What’s your MO for fighting the war?
My answer is perfectly logical to your “gross” indifference to what is being done to our republic. You hide behind a pretense that does not apply.
The legislatures of the several sovereign STATES voted - on behalf of their citizens - to amend the several State Constitutions, so to affect the will of the majority of citizens whom they represent. In other divers cases there were legal and binding referendums petitioned by the citizens and placed on legitimate ballots for a vote by the same.
You forget that the federal government is a CREATURE OF THE STATES - not the other way around. WE employ them, they do not employ us! In that light, the USSC VIOLATED the rights of its employer - the people of the United States of America, and, by judicial fiat, usurped the express will of the people on an issue of how their culture and society shall be MORALLY constructed.
The USSC willfully, arrogantly and unjustly abrogated the expressed will (laws) of the majority of the several States, and the citizens thereof, on an issue over which they have NO LEGAL JURISDICTION.
This action WILL result in civil war.
The employer in this case, are the people who elected her. They will have the opportunity to fire her at the next election. But I have a feeling that the majority of the people who elected her will agree with her.