"Well, I just know that isn't true. Bill and Hillary did NOT have the same servers. I oughta know. I was his server for those years. And believe you me I NEVER served his wife!"
Posted on 08/31/2015 2:54:06 PM PDT by Bulwinkle
Records reveal that Hillary Clinton’s private clintonemail.com server shared an IP address with her husband Bill Clinton’s email server, presidentclinton.com, and both servers were housed in New York City, not in the basement of the Clintons’ Chappaqua, New York home.
Web archives show that the Presidentclinton.com Web address was being operated by the Clinton Foundation as of 2009, when Hillary Clinton registered her own clintonemail.com server.....
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
He'd have a captive audience for his ego. She'd have captive girlfriends.
If we the people paid the bills then ALL the server belongs to us
Not only the worst Secretary of State, but the stupidest.
Elected officials belong to us but look how that has turned out.
•The SEC charged a Clinton Foundation trustee with misallocating $9.5M from his database company. Shareholders sued for using the company jet to fly the Clintons around and paying Bill Clinton a $3M consulting fee.
• A Clinton Foundation trustee was accused of paying Bahraini executives (roughly $52 million) to win sales contracts for US-based Alcoa which later settled with the DOJ for $384M.
• A Clinton Foundation trustee donated to Hillary’s campaigns...gave the Clintons millions in honoraria and millions more to the foundation. The trustee was arrested for allegedly defrauding a bank. He pleaded guilty in a Bklyn court to “funneling more than $180,000 in illegal contributions to three federal candidates,” Hillary among them.
• An Indian legislator sat at the head table at the Clinton Global Initiative and dined privately with the Clintons at their home. He gave between $1-5 million to the Clinton Foundation....then was arrested for bribing members of parliament WRT a US-Indian nuclear-technology agreement....he was booted from his party, ending his political career.
• Venezuelan Claudio Osorio fundraised for Hillary and supported the Clinton Global Initiative. He falsified federal applications and bilked US taxpayers to score a loan of $10M tax dollars to build homes in earthquake-ravaged Haiti. Osorio was convicted of financial fraud, using federal “humanitarian assistance for personal benefit,” and got 12 years in federal prison.
• He was on the federal terrorist no-fly list yet a Lebanese-British businessman donated $460,000 to Miami Democrats for voter-registration and attended the Clintons’ WH Christmas party. He was later convicted of money-laundering and “aiding a criminal organization WRT billions of dollars stolen from Nigeria. The Lebanese businessman’s company pledged $1 billion to the Clinton Global Initiative. The eco-minded Clinton awarded him a prize for “sustainable development.”
Elected officials belong to the lobbies and the countries who have paid into library and other slush funds
Where is the grand jury? It is past time.
<><> Clinton Foundation donors,
<><>groups bribing the Clintons w/ humongous honoraria,
<><> those who bribed Bill w/ multi-million dollar consultancies
<><> all the lucrative insider business deals
<><> Loyal Clinton insiders working the con for 2016 Hillary.
==========================================
CLINTON CASH AUTHOR PETER SCHWEIZER OBSERVES Deleted Hillary Emails Probably Relate to shady ‘Clinton Cash’ Transactions:
At first glance, the Clinton’s astounding honoraria and humongous Foundation donations seem to provide the bulk of the couple’s income.
Bill’s honoraria increased dramatically-—earning some $50 million during Hillary’s four-year term as secretary of State....including an Irish scholarship fund, a Korean conglomerate, and, a Nigerian newspaper company......each of whom paid Clinton more than half a million dollars for a single speech.
The Wash/Post reports Hillary earned $11.7 million for 51 speeches since Jan 2014.....she pocketed an astonishing $625,000 for two speeches in one day!
===============================================
I firmly believe the Clinton Foundation’s gigantic donor list, and their astonishing blizzard of speaking honoraria, are a smoke screen for their secret wealth——and the way they make billions sub rosa-—intertwining their vaunted “charity” work and public office.
The calculated Clintons have sought to branch out into other business activities......though little is known about the exact nature and financial worth of Bill and Hillary’s non-speech business interests.
Recent reports indicate the Clintons were party to multi-billion dollar Mideast arms deals....Kazakhstan uranium mines....and Haitian gold mines...oil deals....telecom businesses, financial powerhouses like Teneo, Goldman Sachs.....etc etc etc.
THE CON ARTIST CLINTONS GRABBED EVERYTHNG THAT WASNT NAILED DOWN-—Lucrative business interests were cunningly intertwined w/ the Foundation’s “do-good” activities....enabled by Hillary’s catbird seat at the State Dept.
At last count the Clintons apparently raised an astounding $2 billion from their foundation activities and their political campaigns.....
.....does not include monies flowing in from the various lucrative business ventures, interest accrued, safe deposit boxes, real estate assets, passive income on which they pay no taxes, income from Chelsea’s hubby’s hedge fund, monies invested in Goldman Sachs, interest in financial powerhouse Teneo..... etc etc etc.......
They are worth a bundle.....accumulated in record time.
================================================
Legal action might involve (1) an FBI investigation, and, (2) the US DOJ-—both in the grip of Obama so political hijinks loom. (3) a congressional committee, with subpoena power.
Here’s a fourth option: a six-month investigation: indicated the Clintons diverted tens millions of dollars that they solicited for specific Foundation charitable purposes (that were found to have been diverted to the personal enrichment of themselves and their close associates).
THIS IS CONSIDERED MAIL FRAUD Raising money for a specific cause that was diverted elsewhere is considered mail fraud.If the FBI, DOJ and IRS won’t shape up to nab the conniving Clintons, the US Postal Inspector has been known to lock-up many crooks for using similar scams.
REPORT MAIL FRAUD HERE: https://postalinspectors.uspis.gov/contactUs/filecomplaint.aspx
Ken5050,
A server is a piece of hardware. If you are handling a LARGE email service or webpages, you may have 2,3 5, 10 maybe 20 machines all linked together physically.
But the outside world would essentially see 1 piece of hardware. That is the IP Address.
For a hacker, this would be like striking oil in a gold mine.
In any sane universe, the fact that the Clinton Foundation and Clintonemail.com shared the same IP address would be DEVESTATING news to Hillary Clinton. There is NO WAY IN THE WORLD that anyone wanting to stay out of prison would have approved this setup.
Well, now!
This puts good ol’ little girl HUMA right in the framework that TRUMP mentioned this week, doesn’t it???????
That's what I thought..but the sentence above makes it sound like something different. Is it just bad writing and lousy editing?
Nowadays people run a lot of virtual "servers" all on the same hardware. In other words, you load the "host" operating system and then you load any number of "guest" operating systems aka "servers". That doesn't imply much collusion however. It is essentially like having separate servers each on their own hardware ("machine"). The only thing one administrator could do is mount the files from any of the servers onto the host although typically there will be files mounted from the host onto some of or all of the "guests".
When an administrator sets up the above type of network, typically all of the guest servers will have the same IP as the host. The host NATs the guest servers, essentially relaying all the internet traffic as if it were coming from the host but in reality the host is running its own internal virtual network that all the guests use.
But the above is no different than having multiple servers on hardware (machines) and NATing them through a router. In that case both the servers have the same IP address even though they are on different machines. That was certainly the cheapest way to set it up although nowadays you can set up your own servers each with their own IP for $5 a month. The bottom line is the fact that they could be NATed through a router versus NATed on a host does not matter much at all.
The fact that they have the same IP means that the people who created the network were cheap and didn't want to pay for more IPs, although like I said, nowadays they are $5 per month with a virtual server (with minimal storage and processing), $10 or $20 a month would be enough to run anyone's email however.
But back in those days (i.e. 5-6 years ago) the extra IPs would cost $50 a month more each especially to an unsophisticated buyer in an off-market like Arkansas. So they used NAT with a router or with host and virtual guests. The fact that they used one IP does not mean very much, and certainly does not prove that the servers shared files. In fact it is just as easy to share files across servers no matter how they are set up.
One other possibility is two email servers on a single OS (in this case we would call that OS the machine). The two email servers would server different domains (e.g. @hillary-state-com and @clintonfoundation.com) but that does not seem like a very strong possibility since it is harder to set up. It does have the advantage of being exceedingly cheap though.
Bad writing and editing.
128.128.1.1 might be an IP Address for 1 piece of hardware that is configured as a server.
128.128.5.100 might be an IP address for 10 pieces of hardware all linked together, all operating as a single server.
The second one just has a much higher storage capacity, and depending on the type of hardware, would be faster.
Does FB not have a moderator anymore? The same stories are posted several times - one after the other, over and over????
and over...
Haul this POS in for sworn testimony~!!!
*********************************************************************
Ya think maybe she might fib a little anyway. What’s a little perjury charge mean to her anyway? After all her husband lied to a grand jury and got away with it.
Means that they were routed through one IP. Means nothing about the servers behind that IP. It also does not mean that the email or web or any other servers were all running in the same OS although that could be true. For example domains in dreamhost all run on the same server so could be your "hacker gold mine" scenario. But domains on many other hosting services give you one IPV4 with some number of servers depending on what you want to spend. That is now, and back in the day IPV4 addresses cost more per month and there were several ways to have different domains on different (hardware) servers behind one IP address.
Or serving up 10 separate domains on 10 separate OS's (no hacker gold mine in theory). But there is what you might call a hacker silver mine which is that poor administrators would likely create linkages from one server to another or to a set of front end servers through a back end server running a database (hence a gold mine).
I think your point is pretty valid no matter what the configuration especially considering the likelihood of cheapness and sloppy administration.
"Well, I just know that isn't true. Bill and Hillary did NOT have the same servers. I oughta know. I was his server for those years. And believe you me I NEVER served his wife!"
Does this mean IT people working for Clinton Foundation had access to hillary’s classified info?
Clearly. As well as anyone who hacked into a Foundation secretary’s email.
Why the srcretary’s?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.