Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

M’ARTHUR IN JAPAN; YOKOSUKA IS TAKEN; ARMY, NAVY REPORT ON PEARL HARBOR (8/30/45)
Microfilm-New York Times archives, Monterey Public Library | 8/30/45 | Frank L. Kluckhohn, Felix Belair Jr., C.L. Sulzberger, Sidney Shalett, James B. Reston

Posted on 08/30/2015 4:45:25 AM PDT by Homer_J_Simpson

1

 photo 0830-atsugi_zpsteaebidc.jpg

2

 photo 0830-atsugi2_zpsi5nwot00.jpg

3

 photo 0830-atsugi3_zpsjgwnro66.jpg

4

 photo 0830-atsugi4_zpsyuyzypmq.jpg

5

 photo 0830-atsugi5_zpsmemfivm0.jpg

6

 photo 0830-atsugi6_zpsbwwrwucj.jpg

7

 photo 0830-atsugi7_zpsfywachp2.jpg

8

 photo 0830-atsugi8_zpswsifbsn8.jpg

9

 photo 0830-atsugi9_zpsop5qyovx.jpg

10

 photo 0830-atsugi10_zpse46outtw.jpg

11

 photo 0830-atsugi11_zpsjkmuxcov.jpg

12

 photo 0830-atsugi12_zps0ukbq2ev.jpg

13

 photo 0830-atsugi13_zpstandbps3.jpg

14

 photo 0830-atsugi14_zpslfepujy2.jpg

15

 photo 0830-atsugi15_zpsrmg2yxjx.jpg


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: history; milhist; realtime; worldwarii
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Homer_J_Simpson

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=60670

Harry S. Truman
Executive Order 9607 - Revoking Executive Order 9301 of February 9, 1943, Establishing a Minimum Wartime Workweek of Forty-Eight Hours

August 30, 1945

By virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and statues as President of the United States it is ordered that Executive Order 9301 of February 9, 1943, establishing a minimum wartime workweek of forty-eight hours, be, and it is hereby, revoked.

HARRY S. TRUMAN
THE WHITE HOUSE,
August 30, 1945

Citation: Harry S. Truman: “Executive Order 9607 - Revoking Executive Order 9301 of February 9, 1943, Establishing a Minimum Wartime Workweek of Forty-Eight Hours,” August 30, 1945.


41 posted on 08/30/2015 9:19:55 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Donald Trump is a symptom, not the cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fso301

LOL- sure it isn’t...


42 posted on 08/30/2015 9:21:13 AM PDT by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple

Kimmel was not completely innocent but imo the way they dismissed the signs of the impending attack by the japs on the homeland eerily parallels the way they dismissed an impending attack on the homeland by muslim terrorists 60 years later...


43 posted on 08/30/2015 9:25:06 AM PDT by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=12381

Harry S. Truman
118 - The President’s News Conference
August 30, 1945

THE PRESIDENT. [1.] Byron Price has agreed to go to Germany in an advisory capacity on public relations. He is going with the approval of General Eisenhower and General Clay, and I am very happy that he is going, because I think he can be a great deal of help to that situation over there.

[2.] In yesterday’s report which I handed to you I did not know at the time, because I hadn’t had time to read it completely myself, that there had been some aspersions cast on Cordell Hull. I want to agree fully and completely with Secretary Stimson on what he said about Cordell Hull.

[3.] Ambassador Pauley this afternoon will hold a press conference at 3 p.m. on the reparations situation. I think it will be right interesting and instructive to those of you who are interested in reparations.

Now if there are any questions—

[4.] Q. Mr. President, do you plan to confer with General de Gaulle again before he returns to France?

THE PRESIDENT. I don’t know; if General de Gaulle returns to Washington I may see him.

[5.] Q. In a magazine article you wrote, or that appeared under your name, when you were a Senator—

THE PRESIDENT. Things come back to haunt you! [Laughter]

Q.—you said Admiral Kimmel and General Short were not on speaking terms. Admiral Kimmel subsequently said that was a false statement.

THE PRESIDENT. Apparently, according to this report, it was not a statement of fact. I was speaking with the best information I had at the time.

Q. Mr. President, was there any reason for putting out the report on the day that we entered Tokyo?

THE PRESIDENT. No, no reason except that there was so much conversation about it; there was no ulterior motive to it.

Q. Mr. President, despite what you said yesterday, there are some very strong reports on the Hill and elsewhere that you are going to order the Army and Navy to institute a court-martial proceeding against certain people.

THE PRESIDENT. I am not. The matter has not been brought up to me. I don’t think I have authority to order a court-martial. I think it has to go through a form of procedure set up by Congress.

Q. There is a lot of talk that indicates some of them think the gentlemen, mentioning General Short and Admiral Kimmel, should have a court-martial if for no other reason than to make their side public.

THE PRESIDENT. If they want it, I have no objection to it. I want everybody to be fairly treated.

Q. You would like to see those fellows make their statement ?

THE PRESIDENT. Perfectly satisfactory to me.

Q. Is there any reason why they can’t make it without a court-martial?

THE PRESIDENT. I will not put a muzzle on them.

Q. Representative May represented the reports as a “whitewash.” Do you agree with that?

THE PRESIDENT. I don’t. I don’t think Representative May read the report. [Laughter] If you read them very carefully, they are not a “whitewash.”

Q. In that same article you discussed your feeling for need of unity of command. In the light of these new reports is there anything more you would like to say about that?

THE PRESIDENT. I am still in favor of unity of command, and always have been.

[6.] Q. Mr. President, can you tell us about Mme. Chiang’s visit yesterday?

THE PRESIDENT. She was in to pay her respects before returning to China. We had a very pleasant visit on the situation in the Far East. She was very happy over the Russian-Chinese treaty, just as all of us are.

[7.] Q. Mr. President, did you happen to receive a petition from some people in Indiana, near Indianapolis, about a boy named Colby who has been sentenced to hang in Germany?

THE PRESIDENT. I don’t remember receiving any such petition.

[8.] Q. Mr. President, is there anything you can tell us about the general plans on what we are going to do to feed Europe this winter, now that lend-lease is—

THE PRESIDENT. I can’t give you the details on that. The plans are being studied and worked on. As soon as the British representatives come here from Great Britain I think we will work out a plan that will be satisfactory to all concerned.

Q. You mean there will be an interim period between now and the time when the Bretton Woods monetary agreement begins?

THE PRESIDENT. That’s the present plan.

Q. How much will that involve.

THE PRESIDENT. I can’t tell you, because I haven’t the figures.

[9.] Q. Will Byron Price be your representative or the representative of one of the departments?

THE PRESIDENT. He is my representative.

[10.] Q. Have you any international assignment for Senator Maybank?

THE PRESIDENT. I hope Senator Maybank will stay in the Senate. He is a very excellent Senator.

Q. We have that inference.

Q. Did you know he wanted a diplomatic post?

THE PRESIDENT. No, I didn’t. He has never discussed the matter with me.

[11.] Q. Has Justice Roberts changed his mind about that international appointment you wanted to give him?

THE PRESIDENT. He hasn’t made up his mind, and I would rather not discuss it until he does.

[12.] Q. If we may return to the Pearl Harbor report for a moment, it seems to me that anyone who tries to make that clear to himself has a very tough time clarifying such things as why, when Stimson reported that they had told Hull that the Army and Navy wanted 3 months more time, they didn’t know about it, and why, when Hull had broken with these people, that information was not relayed to Hawaii.

THE PRESIDENT. I wasn’t here then.

Q. No, but I wondered if you were clear in your own mind.

THE PRESIDENT. I have read it very carefully, and I came to the conclusion that the whole thing is the result of the policy which the country itself pursued. The country was not ready for preparedness. Every time the President made an effort to get a preparedness program through Congress, it was stifled. Whenever the President made a statement about the necessity of preparedness, he was vilified for doing it. I think the country is as much to blame as any individual in this final situation that developed in Pearl Harbor.

Q. May we have that in quotations, sir, exactly what you said?

THE PRESIDENT. Yes.

[13.] Q. Can you tell us anything more about the nature of Mr. Price’s duties?

THE PRESIDENT. Oh, they just wanted an expert’s advice, and when Price’s job ceased over here, they asked that Price give us the benefit of his experience and advice.

Q. Is that for the benefit of both radio and press?

THE PRESIDENT. Everything that has to do with public relations.

Q. Does that apply to Great Britain?

THE PRESIDENT. And to the United States also.

[14.] Q. Mr. President, there is one thing in the Army and Navy Board reports about Marshall and Stark telling President Roosevelt they were not ready for war in November, and the Army report says that was transmitted November 27.

THE PRESIDENT. I only know what I see in the report.

Q. Mr. President, that’s what made me think a court-martial would help to lay the whole thing out.

THE PRESIDENT. It might—it might. I have no objection to a courtmartial, but I don’t intend to order one.

Q. Any reason now why the whole Roberts committee report1 should not be released?

THE PRESIDENT. Only that there is still some information that should not be divulged that has nothing to do with the Pearl Harbor situation. It is the system by which we get information. We need that source of information now as we needed it then.

1The report “Attack Upon Pearl Harbor by Japanese Armed Forces” of the Commission appointed by President Roosevelt and headed by Associate Justice Owen J. Roberts is printed in Senate Document 159 (77 Gong., 2d sess.).

Q. Mr. President, in all the pages of the volumes there is not a word about the two privates who gave the warning.

THE PRESIDENT. They have been promoted; one is a lieutenant and the other a sergeant, I think.

Q. The lieutenant who said “Forget it” is a lieutenant colonel.

THE PRESIDENT. Is he? I didn’t know that.

[15.] Q. Mr. President, do you plan any early recommendation on the St. Lawrence Seaway?

THE PRESIDENT. Yes, I do. I will let you know about it when I get it ready.

[16.] Q. Mr. President, can you tell us further about the interim plan you have in mind between lend-lease and—which departments are working on it?

THE PRESIDENT. State, FEA, and War Department.

[17.] Q. Mr. President, do you have any idea when the 52 pages deleted from the Army report will be made public?2

THE PRESIDENT. I don’t think they ever will be.

2Chapter V of the report of the Army Pearl Harbor Board (released by the President to the press at his news conference of August 29) was omitted in accordance with the Secretary of War’s statement of that date, which the President also released. The missing 52 pages were made public by Secretary of War Patterson on October 5, 1945.

Q. Why?

THE PRESIDENT. For the reason I just told you; there are sources of information to be protected.

[18.] Q. Did Mme. Chiang talk with you about the relations of China with America and a meeting between you and the Generalissimo?

THE PRESIDENT. The Generalissimo would like very much to see me, and I would like very much to see him, but no definite plans were made for a visit either way.

Reporter: Thank you, Mr. President.

Note: President Truman’s twenty-second news conference was held in his office at the White House at 10 a.m. on Thursday, August 30, 1945. The White House Official Reporter noted that the following special guests attended this conference: Secretary of State James F. Byrnes, Fleet Admiral William D. Leahy, and Mrs. Alfred (Frances) Burns, a reporter on the Boston Globe who was writing a special story on the President.

Citation: Harry S. Truman: “The President’s News Conference,” August 30, 1945.


44 posted on 08/30/2015 9:26:21 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Donald Trump is a symptom, not the cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America
never ceased to be amazed how Kimmel got the boot but somehow McArthur was treated as a hero....

Kimmel was expendable. Dugout Doug wasn't.
45 posted on 08/30/2015 9:27:49 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
From the August 30th presidential press conference transcript:

-----

"I have read it very carefully, and I came to the conclusion that the whole thing is the result of the policy which the country itself pursued. The country was not ready for preparedness. Every time the President made an effort to get a preparedness program through Congress, it was stifled. Whenever the President made a statement about the necessity of preparedness, he was vilified for doing it. I think the country is as much to blame as any individual in this final situation that developed in Pearl Harbor."

Harry S. Truman

-----

Personally, I think he was right.

46 posted on 08/30/2015 9:30:14 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Donald Trump is a symptom, not the cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!
The one played by Robert Conrad on TV had A LOT of embellishment, and the terrain/climate of the island depicted in the show was due to it being filmed in arid California, not the South Pacific!

Waaaaiiiiitttttt a minute ...

Are you saying that WWII USMC fighter pilots WEREN'T forward-deployed for combat on islands that featured Navy hospitals fully staffed with nurses who wore hot-pants and had Farrah Fawcette-style feathered haircuts????

Just ruined my whole childhood there, dude. Thanks.
47 posted on 08/30/2015 9:30:51 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America
LOL- sure it isn’t...

I'm not sure what you mean by that.

48 posted on 08/30/2015 9:31:40 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: fso301

i’m not surprised...


49 posted on 08/30/2015 9:37:05 AM PDT by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

ever read “We Band of Angels” about the US nurses on Bataan taken POW?? Worth the read for additional on the ground opinions of mcarthur’s blunders:

http://www.amazon.com/We-Band-Angels-American-Trapped/dp/0812984846


50 posted on 08/30/2015 9:39:17 AM PDT by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter; PeterPrinciple

should also add; if Kimmel was kept around a bit longer Wake may have never fallen but when they kicked Kimmel out they gave up Wake...Another great historical book for you:

http://www.amazon.com/Given-Up-Dead-Americas-Heroic/dp/0553585673


51 posted on 08/30/2015 9:41:33 AM PDT by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America
i’m not surprised...

Why not try enlightening us?

52 posted on 08/30/2015 9:44:38 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

The photo of MacArthur and the other generals
reminded me that when I was 16 yrs old I met
General Joe Swing CO 11th AB in the small
farming community of Colusa, Ca. My dad,
brother, and I had been out goose hunting
early AM and we decided to go to town for
breakfast. I saw this older gent sitting
at a table. He was wearing an 11th AB
shoulder patch. I told my dad. When we were
leaving my dad walked up behind the older
man and asked him which regiment he was in.
The man replied “I’m the son of a bitch who
used to kick your asses around!” This was in 1967.

General Swing was among the class of West Point
grads that the “stars fell on”. Years later my
dad chatted with General Swing at a reunion and
they shared a laugh about their previous encounter.


53 posted on 08/30/2015 9:48:51 AM PDT by Sivad (NorCal red turf ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson
http://www.usspavlic.org/pages/chapter4.htm

USS Pavlic - APD 70

August 30, 1945

At 4:59 am we got underway for Tokyo Bay with orders to neutralize Fort #4 and Fort #2, both on islands in Tokyo Bay. As we were entering Tokyo Bay and approaching Fort #4, close to Yokosuka Naval Base, all hands were at general quarters because no one knew how the Japanese were going to react. At 9:34 am two boatloads of British marines were under way for Fort #4. At 9:55 am we proceeded to Fort #2 on an island near the center of the bay. By 10:00 am we had word that Fort #4 was secured. By 10:16 am the other two boats were away with British marines to neutralize Fort #2, and we then anchored off Fort #2. The ship’s camera went in the boats to Fort #2. Hence we have no pictures of Fort #4.

As the boats approached the island fort you could see the white surrender flag flying over it. There is also a small group of soldiers standing near the landing ramp with a surrender flag.

On landing at the boat ramp they found the four-man surrender committee waiting.

The British marines...were apparently a seasoned group of guys who’d been at war for a good six years. In spite of their WW I steel helmets, you had to take them seriously. They really seemed to love the food we had on our ship—which we were not inclined to rate too highly. Actually, I thought it was ok except for the powdered milk and the coffee. They came ashore ready for trouble, but fortunately, there wasn’t any.

In addition to the boat crews, Pavlic’s part of the landing party (right) was a group of volunteers, a mix of various ratings from gunner’s mate to signalman to mailman. When they had asked for volunteers, they got lots of responses, but not from me. With the war over, I thought it would be silly to risk a sniper’s bullet from some dedicated die-hard, unless there was a real need for me to get involved. Not pictured are our fellows in the boat crews, which also went ashore.

Pictured...is the formal surrender ceremony in which the big surrender flag is being lowered. This was supposed to be a surrender to the British landing party. However, the Japanese were willing to surrender to the Americans, not to the British. Consequently there was a hurried boat trip back to the ship to get an American flag. Everything then went smoothly and US colors were raised over Fort #2 shortly thereafter.

It wasn’t as dramatic as the raising of the flag over Iwo Jima, but it was probably one of the first formal surrender ceremonies in the Tokyo area. ...

54 posted on 08/30/2015 9:48:57 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Donald Trump is a symptom, not the cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson

Some interesting background on the contacts that led to cooperation between MacArthur and Hirohito.

http://www.jstor.org/stable/133011?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents


55 posted on 08/30/2015 10:05:52 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Donald Trump is a symptom, not the cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson
Hanawa camp history

http://www.mansell.com/pow_resources/camplists/sendai/hanawa/murph_5.html

KILL THE PRISONERS. Page 5

The Japanese government policy was to not allow the escape of a single POW and to eliminate them without a lingering trace.

At Hanawa, the final disposition of the POWs was clear. The Japanese, second-in-command, Sergeant Hoichi Takahashi who worked directly under the Japanese camp commander, Toshinori Asaka, was mean and cruel and often times dealt brutal treatment to the POWs. At other times, he attempted to be somewhat friendly. During several of his friendly moments he told me and many others that official Japanese Army orders directed that all POWs be summarily massacred at the moment that Allied Forces landed on the Japanese homeland. He said that all Japanese men, women, and children were armed and ready to defend and die for their homeland. He told us that they would be through with the POWs at that time and that we would just be in their way. He did not tell us the means in which they would massacre us but it was our belief that we would all be forced into the deepest lateral of the copper mine, the entrance sealed and that we would be buried alive there with no trace left for eternity. Sgt. Takahachi showed us, at one time, copies of the Japanese orders (in Japanese of course) that ordered our death when the Americans invade the homeland...

Read the whole account here:

http://www.mansell.com/pow_resources/camplists/sendai/hanawa/murph_5.html

56 posted on 08/30/2015 10:16:06 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Donald Trump is a symptom, not the cure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Thanks for the pictures. Fascinating history.

The activities of 30 August were so smooth it seems apparent that the Japanese people and younger soldiers really were through with this war.

57 posted on 08/30/2015 2:43:08 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America; tanknetter
ever read “We Band of Angels” about the US nurses on Bataan taken POW?? Worth the read for additional on the ground opinions of mcarthur’s blunders:

Citing the review of a book written 58 years after the fact about a group of nurses, most of whom were already dead as evidence of your belief is not credible.

58 posted on 08/30/2015 2:50:56 PM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Homer_J_Simpson

HMS Prince Robert arriving at Kowloon, August 30, 1945.

59 posted on 08/30/2015 3:22:06 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into." - Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Word received of many survivors of USS Houston. I remember posting about the loss/failure to return of the Houston after the disaster of the Battle of Java Sea. The war really has come full circle.


60 posted on 08/30/2015 4:47:37 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson