Posted on 08/09/2015 4:17:24 PM PDT by Red Steel
Edited on 08/09/2015 4:18:47 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
NEW YORK
(Excerpt) Read more at wtvr.com ...
whoa...
Donald Trump offered a digital olive branch to Rosie O’Donnell Tuesday, one day after she revealed she survived a heart attack last week.Trump took to Twitter with this message:
.@rosie, get better fast. I'm starting to miss you!The comedienne responded cheekily:
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 21, 2012@realdonaldtrump @rosie - well thank u donald - i must admit ur post was a bit of a shock ... r u trying to kill me ? xx
Megyn Kelly drew First Blood. That’s all Donald Trump could think, hence his thoughts of her having blood come out of her eyes. The blond Bimbo was yapping at him like a chihuahua dog, getting an angrier tone and look when she continued badgering Trump with inane followups. That ain’t good journalism. Megyn doesn’t deserve to be anchor, except for being a blond cookie-cutter female host on Fox.
Why did the FOX employee (I do not have a TV and I do know nor care about TV "reporters") omit important details that
I noticed the same on our cable box. A Stossel show was being aired while the schedule announced it was the Kelly show. Was she busy wiping away bloody tears?
Sure hope so!
GOPE taking it in the butt. Carly outted herself today as an establishment hoe so she'll fade quickly.
I will only watch her again if Ted Cruz is on her show.
I urge her to attack Ted Cruz like she did Trump.
Its not the reporters job to do the explaining....it is Trump's.
Do you not think a Candy Crowley or a Chuck Todd wouldn't ask him a questions about his past utterances?
If he can't get past Fox News, how do you think he'll manage the Democrat supporting MSM?
She deserves it. She loves to attack, even her own “friendly” interviewees. I know she’s a lawyer, but she’s like a trial lawyer who turns on her own witnesses. Been waiting for someone to put her in her place
Right. Fox is just a warm-up. Good point.
It is sad that you are incapable of understanding why the question is relevant. I will attempt to explain. The Dems have used the “war on women” in successful attacks against the Republicans. If Trump is the candidate, given his rude comments towards women, how will he answer the charges that the Clinton campaign will level against him? If he is as inept at responding to Clinton as he was in answering Megan Kelly’s question it will be a long unsuccessful campaign. Can you grasp the concept. It was a legitimate question. The trumpeteers want Fox to treat Trump the way the MSM has treated Obama, by bowing at his feet. Answering tough question helps candidates. A prime example is Clinton current ineptitude at answering questions.
lawyer is meaningless.
prosecutors can pick and chose which prosecutions and defense attorneys the same.
You said it much better than I did.
Kudos.
.....my take is only slightly different from yours.
I would say that we have over 50 EXISTENTIAL issues facing our country and the news is dominated by blather about Megyn’s menstrual period.
I STILL like Megyn more than I dislike her but she really did not do herself or her employer any favors in this debate.
To Roger Ailes, if there is a next time, tell your little self promoting starlets they have 15 seconds to ask their question!!!! Then, please shut up as the American People will appreciate it.
As for the MSM employees / Democrats yes whoever is the candidate will have to put PC aside give it back at them hard.
As for me vis-a-vis Trump I favor him because..
Trump is no Goldwater (Senator, U.S.A.F. Brig. Gen.) and the Goldwaters (owned department store chain) were no Trump but otherwise..
I remember election 1964..
Borrowing the words of the dominant Rockefeller Republicans in 1964 "We [have] to destroyBarry GoldwaterDonald Trump as a member of the human race."The original quote is from Nelson Rockefeller's public relations head, Stuart Spencer.
And all that was before the convention that selected Goldwater and continued through the election with lots of help from MSM employees.
It's time to show the D.C. insiders that it's over for them.
If he goes third party, I hope blood runs out of his....wherever.
You're missing the point. The moderators of a debate aren't supposed to attack some participants and let others get a free pass. The question to Trump had nothing to do with policy or how he would govern, but dredged up tabloid style dirt and wrapped it up as a question. And Ms. Kelly misrepresented the events she derived her question from.
It really was no different than somebody asking Ms. Kelly questions about the topics she discussed with Howard Stern if she was participating in a panel discussion about politics. She wouldn't tolerate it, nor would anyone consider it fair to be asking such a question. The same applies to her questions to Mr. Trump.
Well, she prosecutes her own side. I’m fed up with it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.