Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WilliamofCarmichael
Why did the FOX employee (I do not have a TV and I do know nor care about TV "reporters") omit important details

Its not the reporters job to do the explaining....it is Trump's.

Do you not think a Candy Crowley or a Chuck Todd wouldn't ask him a questions about his past utterances?

If he can't get past Fox News, how do you think he'll manage the Democrat supporting MSM?

169 posted on 08/09/2015 6:57:21 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]


To: eddie willers

Right. Fox is just a warm-up. Good point.


171 posted on 08/09/2015 6:58:45 PM PDT by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

To: eddie willers
Those are good points. However as I type this I am hearing Bill Cunningham (radio) say that Trump went from 22% to 23% among likely Republican primary voters.

As for the MSM employees / Democrats yes whoever is the candidate will have to put PC aside give it back at them hard.

As for me vis-a-vis Trump I favor him because..

Trump is no Goldwater (Senator, U.S.A.F. Brig. Gen.) and the Goldwaters (owned department store chain) were no Trump but otherwise..

I remember election 1964..

Borrowing the words of the dominant Rockefeller Republicans in 1964 "We [have] to destroy Barry Goldwater Donald Trump as a member of the human race."

The original quote is from Nelson Rockefeller's public relations head, Stuart Spencer.

And all that was before the convention that selected Goldwater and continued through the election with lots of help from MSM employees.

It's time to show the D.C. insiders that it's over for them.

177 posted on 08/09/2015 7:21:18 PM PDT by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

To: eddie willers
Its not the reporters job to do the explaining....it is Trump's.

You're missing the point. The moderators of a debate aren't supposed to attack some participants and let others get a free pass. The question to Trump had nothing to do with policy or how he would govern, but dredged up tabloid style dirt and wrapped it up as a question. And Ms. Kelly misrepresented the events she derived her question from.

It really was no different than somebody asking Ms. Kelly questions about the topics she discussed with Howard Stern if she was participating in a panel discussion about politics. She wouldn't tolerate it, nor would anyone consider it fair to be asking such a question. The same applies to her questions to Mr. Trump.

179 posted on 08/09/2015 7:34:22 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

To: eddie willers
Do you not think a Candy Crowley or a Chuck Todd wouldn't ask him a questions about his past utterances?

Trump would EXPECT such from the LIBERALS like Crowley and Todd.. but to be blindsided by those who claim to support Conservative principles would send anyone into a tirade.

A knife in your back is usually a strong enough reason to retaliate.

184 posted on 08/09/2015 8:22:35 PM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson